What this week’s elections could mean for the midterms - Episode Artwork
News

What this week’s elections could mean for the midterms

This episode explores the implications of recent off-year elections, where Democratic candidates achieved significant victories in key states. Political analysts discuss how these results may shape th...

What this week’s elections could mean for the midterms
What this week’s elections could mean for the midterms
News • 0:00 / 0:00

Interactive Transcript

spk_0 It might have been an off year election, but this week Democratic candidates won marquee
spk_0 races in New Jersey, Virginia, and New York City. So does their big night mean something bigger?
spk_0 Well, we're all going to pretend it does because that's what we did.
spk_0 That's Larry Sabato, a professor of politics at the University of Virginia,
spk_0 speaking with my colleague, Layla Foddle.
spk_0 We analyze elections and we pretend to know what's going to happen
spk_0 in a year from now. But the truth is the headlines will change so many times between now
spk_0 and the midterm elections in November of 2026.
spk_0 That hasn't stopped Democrats and Republicans from making meaning out of the results.
spk_0 For Democrats like California Attorney General Rob Bonta,
spk_0 this was a sign that voters are unhappy with the current administration.
spk_0 The status quo is not working for voters. It was very much a referendum on Trump. He wasn't on
spk_0 the ballot, but he was essentially on the ballot. Meanwhile, most Republicans are downplaying the
spk_0 results. House Speaker Mike Johnson during a news conference on Thursday.
spk_0 This is not a surprise to us. I mean,
spk_0 blue state selectable leaders. I mean, that, yeah, so what?
spk_0 Off-year election results in isolated places are never indicative of the upcoming midterm election.
spk_0 The GOP is an excellent position to win big next year.
spk_0 But whether Tuesday night was a blip or a turning point, both parties have to figure out where they
spk_0 go from here. Trump got that started a breakfast with Republican senators on Wednesday.
spk_0 I don't think it was good for Republicans. I don't think it was good. I'm not sure it was good for
spk_0 anybody, but we had an interesting evening and we learned a lot. And we're going to talk about
spk_0 that. And we're going to talk about it too. Consider this. It's now less than a year from the midterms.
spk_0 How are the major political parties looking to ramp up the votes?
spk_0 From NPR, I'm Wana Summers.
spk_0 This message comes from the Financial Times.
spk_0 Lead poisoning is a hidden epidemic in the UK. On the untold podcast,
spk_0 hear from people who have been affected. Where is the national strategy to address this?
spk_0 Listen to untold toxic legacy wherever you get your podcasts.
spk_0 This week on the NPR Politics podcast, the political laws of gravity still exist.
spk_0 When you have an unpopular president and people are dissatisfied with the economy,
spk_0 that president's party loses. Plus, the president's tariffs at the Supreme Court
spk_0 catch up on political news you've missed or have just been sitting out on the NPR Politics podcast.
spk_0 Listen on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts.
spk_0 You ever get to the pharmacy and you're expecting your medication to cost 20 bucks,
spk_0 but instead it's 200 or 1000. And you're like, wait, really?
spk_0 Like, are you sure? Is there some kind of mistake?
spk_0 This week on the LifeKit podcast, what to do when your prescription costs way more than you
spk_0 expected? You can listen in the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts.
spk_0 It's consider this from NPR. The elections this week were the first time that voters got to
spk_0 register how they're feeling a year after president from selection. And the answer was clear,
spk_0 they are not happy with the party in power. Now both Republicans and Democrats are reflecting
spk_0 on where they are and what they need to do to win in the future. NPR Senior Political Editor and
spk_0 Correspondent Dominic Homo Naro and Senior White House Correspondent Tamer Keith are reflecting
spk_0 on that too. And they're here to talk about it. Hi there. Hello.
spk_0 Great to be with you. So guys, Democrats had a huge week big wins for Mayor New York City,
spk_0 Governor and New Jersey as well as in Virginia. How are they feeling going forward?
spk_0 Democrats got their groove back at least a little bit after last year's bruising losses.
spk_0 They spent months in the political wilderness, but now they feel like they have a road map out.
spk_0 Just listen to Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin in a call earlier this week.
spk_0 Make no mistake. The Democratic Party is back. The Democratic Party is a party of affordability,
spk_0 and the Democratic Party is full steam ahead to take back Congress next year.
spk_0 Winning is one heck of a drug. Yeah, and this is a lesson that they learned from the 2024 election.
spk_0 A lot of people felt like it was too esoteric, focused in many respects on Trump and democracy.
spk_0 You know, Kamal Harris says the Democratic candidate tried on the economy and inflation,
spk_0 but it's a lot harder to win and make the focus on affordability when you're in charge and people
spk_0 are upset about the state of the cost of living. And it's a message that Democrats are coalescing
spk_0 around now, no matter who that candidate is. And there was a lot of ideological diversity
spk_0 among the Democratic Party candidate to one. How's the party handling that?
spk_0 Yeah, it's easy to look at the election of Democratic Socialists, Zora and Mom Donnie in New York City,
spk_0 and Moderates Abigail Spanberger and Mikey Sherrill in Virginia and New Jersey and say,
spk_0 wow, this party is split between progressives and moderates, but there is actually a through line,
spk_0 which Martin referenced. It's that affordability thing. And there's an analogy here to 2006,
spk_0 when Democrats were still licking their wounds from George W. Bush's reelection,
spk_0 and voters were in a foul mood. Democrats coalesced behind a clear and simple message.
spk_0 John Lawrence was chief of staff, Tnancy Pelosi, who became Speaker of the House after that election.
spk_0 And he says Democrats need to do the same thing now, and he even has some hope that they will.
spk_0 For all the focus on on on Mondani, if you listen to Spanberger or Sherrill's acceptance speeches,
spk_0 they're all talking the same language. I mean, they're not talking about free buses or rent control,
spk_0 that doesn't matter. They're talking about affordability.
spk_0 He says Democrats just need to stick with this affordability message going into the midterms,
spk_0 cost of living, groceries, power bills, housing costs, and not let themselves get distracted by
spk_0 social issues or climate change or the democracy stuff. But as you guys well know, President Trump
spk_0 in his campaign, he specifically promised he would fix the economy. He claims now that he has,
spk_0 but that's not what voters are saying they feel so. What does this mean for Republicans?
spk_0 Yeah, I mean, Trump won in 2024 because of the cost of living. Any promise to fix it,
spk_0 but what he qualifies as a great economy isn't resonating with voters. And that was clearly the case
spk_0 in these off-year elections. For Trump, it's all about things like the stock market and gas prices,
spk_0 but those are not everything. And his tariffs have actively made things more expensive.
spk_0 Does the White House acknowledge that, though?
spk_0 One of the President's top political advisors said this week that Trump will be pivoting to talk more
spk_0 about the cost of living. But he's been talking about it a lot this week, actually, as if it isn't
spk_0 a real problem. I don't want to hear about the affordability because right now,
spk_0 we're much less, if you look at energy, we're getting close to $2 gallon gasoline.
spk_0 That was his Trump last night at a dinner for Central Asian leaders. And he really seem to dismiss
spk_0 the concern about the cost of living as a messaging problem. The affordability is much better with
spk_0 the Republicans. The only problem is the Republicans don't talk about it. And Republicans should start
spk_0 talking about it and use their heads because we have great numbers. We have great, and they can only
spk_0 get better. He says the numbers are going to get better because his tariff policies will ultimately
spk_0 improve the U.S. economy, though that's really not clear at this point. Right now, Trump is facing some
spk_0 of the same issues that President Biden did, which is that you can't credibly tell people that
spk_0 the economic fundamentals are strong and inflation is slowing down. If out in their real lives,
spk_0 they are experiencing sticker shock. Right. And when we get to the midterms Republicans will still
spk_0 be in charge. President Trump himself won't be on the ballot, though. So what dynamic does this
spk_0 create for Republican candidates? I mean, no matter what they do, Republicans are going to be tied to
spk_0 Trump. But in those swing districts, they're going to likely have to try, if the affordability
spk_0 environment doesn't change, to try to distance themselves somewhat from Trump. Here's
spk_0 Republican strategist Mike Duham, a former political director at the Republican National Committee,
spk_0 making that point. Especially in the blue and purple states, there has to be some differentiation
spk_0 from Trump. Doesn't mean you have to completely distance yourself, but there has to be something where
spk_0 you show some level of independence and some level of individuality. And another part of the problem
spk_0 here for Republicans is that they can't actually be Donald Trump. Most candidates have to realize,
spk_0 you're not Donald Trump. You were not on the apprentice for 10 years. You were not a star
spk_0 on the WWE. Your name is not on buildings. So it's really an era wherein of the celebrity politician,
spk_0 but it's also an era of anger at whoever's in charge. Again, 2006 was a marker for the beginning
spk_0 of this trend. Consider that six of the last seven midterm elections have had presidents with
spk_0 approval ratings under 50% and we're moving toward that again with Trump. Yeah, this is a problem
spk_0 that Democrats had when President Obama was in office. He was a turnout machine, but only when he
spk_0 was on the ballot and the party had major losses at the state and even local level during his presidency.
spk_0 Right now, Democrats do not have an obvious leader that will likely be decided by the presidential
spk_0 primary over the next two and a half years. And it's not clear what a post-Trump Republican party
spk_0 looks like either because he has demanded absolute loyalty and fealty from members of his party.
spk_0 Right now in this era of anger and skepticism at presidents, being out of power gives the
spk_0 advantage to Democrats heading into next year's midterms. And Piarra's Dominican Montenegro and
spk_0 Tamariki, thanks to both of you. You're welcome. You got it. This episode was produced by Michael
spk_0 Levit, Casey Morel, Connor Donovan, and Karen Zamora. It was edited by Kelsey Snell and Patrick
spk_0 Jeren Watanagan. Our executive producer is Sammy Yenigan. Thank you to our Consider This Plus
spk_0 listeners who support the work of NPR journalists and help keep public radio strong.
spk_0 Supporters also hear every episode without messages from sponsors. You can learn more at plus.npr.org.
spk_0 It's Consider This From NPR. I'm Wannis Ummers.
spk_0 There are tens of thousands of veterans behind bars in the US, often without any of the mental
spk_0 health services they may need. When you go to prison, you automatically lose your benefits as a
spk_0 veteran. You become a ward of the state. How much do we owe these veterans who have thought our
spk_0 wars? Listen now to the Sunday Story on the Upfirst Podcast from NPR.
spk_0 On the ThruLine Podcast from NPR, the story of the undersea cables that run the internet.
spk_0 Other historians have compared it to the Apollo missions of going to the moon.
spk_0 Listen to ThruLine in the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts.
spk_0 When you hear this podcast without sponsor breaks, Amazon Prime members can listen to
spk_0 consider this sponsor free through Amazon Music. Or you can also support NPR's vital journalism
spk_0 and get consider this plus at plus.npr.org. That's plus.npr.org.