Carl Safina - Ecologist - Founding President of Safina Center - NYTimes Bestselling Author - Episode Artwork
Culture

Carl Safina - Ecologist - Founding President of Safina Center - NYTimes Bestselling Author

In this episode, ecologist and bestselling author Carl Safina shares insights from his latest book, 'Becoming Wild,' exploring the emotional and social lives of animals. He discusses the pro...

Carl Safina - Ecologist - Founding President of Safina Center - NYTimes Bestselling Author
Carl Safina - Ecologist - Founding President of Safina Center - NYTimes Bestselling Author
Culture • 0:00 / 0:00

Interactive Transcript

spk_0 Carl Safina is an ecologist, writer, and founding president of the Safina Center as the author
spk_0 of ten books, including the classic Songford Blue Ocean, as well as New York Times Best
spk_0 Cellar, Beyond Words, what animals think and feel.
spk_0 His most recent book is, Becoming Wild, How Animal Cultures Raise Families Create Beauty
spk_0 and Achieve Peace.
spk_0 His lyrical nonfiction writing explores how humans are changing the living world and
spk_0 what the changes mean for non-human beings and forest all.
spk_0 His work fuses scientific understanding, emotional connection, and a moral call to action.
spk_0 Carl Safina, welcome to one planet podcast in the creative process.
spk_0 It's a really good opportunity to speak with you and the honoured that you're interested
spk_0 in hearing what I have to say, so thank you for having me.
spk_0 We're honoured to hear from you.
spk_0 You've written so many books you've done, documentary television work.
spk_0 I believe you're going to read from becoming wilds to give listeners a view into your
spk_0 written work.
spk_0 So, in this passage, which is about sperm whales, I'm in the Caribbean off the island of
spk_0 Dominica with a scientist named Shane Girro, and we are listening for sperm whales with microphones
spk_0 that are dropped over the side of the boat.
spk_0 The whales spend about 50 minutes out of each hour hunting thousands of feet below the surface.
spk_0 And their echolocation clicks that they use to create their sonar are the loudest sound
spk_0 made by a living thing.
spk_0 They have a social organisation like elephants, which is usually a matriarch or the oldest female
spk_0 and her daughters living together and it's a babysitting culture where
spk_0 when those whales are down for almost an hour at a time, the babies cannot follow,
spk_0 little babies cannot follow.
spk_0 So, there's always somebody who stays up with them if the mother is making one of those
spk_0 foraging dives.
spk_0 So, the way we find them is that we drop the microphone and then we listen and we either hear
spk_0 whales or if we don't hear any, we move along.
spk_0 So, here's the passage from the book.
spk_0 We've failed to find whales so far.
spk_0 And after some interval that I'm not closely keeping, our boat is again undulating across the
spk_0 massage of long swells over to the next spot where we will again listen to the sounds of the deep sea.
spk_0 The blue gray sea is slick and hazy bright.
spk_0 It is both eternal and instantaneous.
spk_0 We travel along in small ecstatic sparks of time.
spk_0 We transit in and out of the company of flying fish, of turns.
spk_0 The sea glittering rolls like a carpet of short blue flames.
spk_0 Something like time must be passing but I feel suspended in an infinite moment that seems to vibrate
spk_0 in place. Perhaps from the whales I have learned something about living.
spk_0 At this stop, Shane, listening to his headphones, raises one finger.
spk_0 He hears whales.
spk_0 More than one, their sonar goes tick, tick, tick.
spk_0 One whale goes silent.
spk_0 She has stopped hunting.
spk_0 Over the next few minutes, others also silence their sonars.
spk_0 From two or three thousand feet beneath the waves, in the frigid blackness where they earn
spk_0 their living, they are coming up, up, up.
spk_0 A few minutes later, the dark heads and backs of two whales shatter the hard sparkle of the sea
spk_0 like tiny newborn islands. The coastline of their bodies generating their own surf,
spk_0 their white puffs drift on the distance.
spk_0 I listen to them clicking out of their clacking coats of recognition,
spk_0 announcing themselves as individuals announcing their family membership,
spk_0 announcing the clan in which they claim membership.
spk_0 They are grading their message of bonding and belonging.
spk_0 Their sound, highly styled, is percussive and precise like castenets.
spk_0 As I listen, their coat is going in and out of phase with each other.
spk_0 Sometimes they are perfectly separated.
spk_0 Sometimes they are clicked coats completely overlap like conversations at a busy table.
spk_0 Three others burst the surface, so a total of five up now.
spk_0 And what I am left with is this impression.
spk_0 A whale is too big to see.
spk_0 At a time you get pieces.
spk_0 Now the head.
spk_0 Now the back.
spk_0 Now the flukes.
spk_0 Never the whole whale.
spk_0 In Rome once I said to my wife Patricia, we've now seen Michelangelo's painting of the creator.
spk_0 But what would the creator's own painting of creation look like?
spk_0 I think that is easy to answer now.
spk_0 It is these whales in this sea.
spk_0 The whales that this ocean has brought forth seem in their pacing and their scale
spk_0 to reflect the enormity of all things past and present.
spk_0 That's so beautiful.
spk_0 It really takes us into the minds and the bodies and the feeling as you say of being alive.
spk_0 Of these wonderful, I would say artists.
spk_0 I would say that when when do we reach that kind of level of performance?
spk_0 Like great artists or great athletes can do that.
spk_0 And your books and you're just your whole life's work has brought us into that deep empathy.
spk_0 Well, thank you very much.
spk_0 That's very kind.
spk_0 Well, it's so important because as you well know, most of us don't treat or consider the lives
spk_0 of animals respectfully.
spk_0 So it's really important that you bear witness to that.
spk_0 And also what you do at the Seffing the Center.
spk_0 What can you share with us about what you've learned about the language of animals,
spk_0 how they communicate, love, learn and teach?
spk_0 Well, I think that what I've learned is mainly for many animals, people for a long time have
spk_0 said that they don't have any thoughts or they don't have any emotions or they're certainly not
spk_0 capable of doing any planning, they have no sense of themselves.
spk_0 And none of that is true at all.
spk_0 I think that for many animals, we're talking mostly about vertebrate animals
spk_0 that are on the larger side.
spk_0 You know, I always have to say because I'm a biologist, animals is everything from sponges
spk_0 to whales.
spk_0 And when we talk about behavior, usually we're talking about the vertebrates and some of the
spk_0 crustaceans, crabs and things like that, as well as cephalopods.
spk_0 Those are the ones whose behaviors really do seem to reflect the obvious workings of a mind.
spk_0 I don't think all of the minds are the same.
spk_0 I don't think all human minds are the same either.
spk_0 And I think that what we see with these other animals is that their existence is very vivid to
spk_0 them with the social animals in particular.
spk_0 They know who they are because of who they are with.
spk_0 They understand themselves as individuals within the context of other individuals.
spk_0 They have group identities.
spk_0 And they are capable of communicating things.
spk_0 Sometimes would sound, you know, with what you might call verbal communication,
spk_0 like the whales and their click patterns, which are like clicked codes,
spk_0 or the alarm calls of birds or of a large variety of mammals have alarm calls or just
spk_0 intention movements that serve very well to communicate enough to coordinate everybody together.
spk_0 Most people have almost no experience with animals except for a few animals that they
spk_0 live with that are domesticated, such as dogs and cats.
spk_0 But I think those animals are nonetheless very instructive and I think that they represent
spk_0 to us and for us what many other animals are capable of doing.
spk_0 So just for instance with my dogs, we have three dogs.
spk_0 We have certain routines in life.
spk_0 They have to do with being around the house and leaving the house and going for walks
spk_0 of along the beaches and things like that.
spk_0 Because they know what the components of their life are,
spk_0 it takes almost no queuing to communicate to them what we're going to do next.
spk_0 They're very alert.
spk_0 They look to us for cues.
spk_0 Often if I'm going to tell my dogs to do something, a lot of people they bark
spk_0 commands to them.
spk_0 I often just whisper or a little word or a little intention movement is totally adequate
spk_0 for them to understand the whole message.
spk_0 The whole message is we're going someplace now or get in the car.
spk_0 We're going to take a car ride or come out here or come inside or whatever it might happen
spk_0 to be. You also see a little bit of planning in the case of the dogs.
spk_0 The people have said for a long time, humans are the only things that are capable of planning.
spk_0 Humans are the only things that have what in psychology is called object permanence,
spk_0 which means that when you cannot see something, you nonetheless know that it's still there.
spk_0 And they've said, oh, humans are the only ones that do that and they develop that at a certain
spk_0 age, a year and a half or whatever it is.
spk_0 Well, certainly not at all true that humans are the only ones that know that when they don't see
spk_0 something that is familiar to them, that they do know it's there because they go looking for it
spk_0 or they go looking for their people or they know where home is if you say go home or they know
spk_0 where the water is, they know where the food is, they know how to judge who's a friend,
spk_0 who's an enemy, who they still aren't sure about that they need to check out, who's a rival,
spk_0 who's interesting, what dog on the beach they've already said hello to that they don't have to
spk_0 bother with again. Just yesterday, one of our three dogs, we left the house to go to an event and
spk_0 instead of closing the glass door, I closed only the screen door because it was a hot day and I
spk_0 thought I could trust them, but no, one of the dogs shredded the screen and then somebody else
spk_0 pushed the screen door sideways. They've never done that before, first of all, but obviously they
spk_0 had a plan in mind and the plan was we don't want to be stuck here in the house. We want to go with
spk_0 Colin Patricia or find them wherever they went. Normally they just stayed there, but yesterday they
spk_0 weren't having it. So they had a plan and the plan was to get out. Now it might seem like
spk_0 breaking through the front screen door is not a plan, but after we went out a second time and
spk_0 closed the glass door, one of the dogs went over to a window to the side of the house. She had to
spk_0 jump up on a bed up on the window. She's never done that before. She's never known or learned that
spk_0 that's a way out. She popped the screen out and jumped out the window and when we came back again,
spk_0 she was outside again, waiting for us. Well, I wasn't too happy about any of that, except that I was
spk_0 pretty impressed with how smart she was. And then when I closed the door to that room and we went out
spk_0 again, now now she's never done this before yesterday, but yesterday she did it three times.
spk_0 She went and found a different window harder to get to, jumped up there, popped that screen out
spk_0 and jumped out of that window to get to us. So all of that because she's never done that before,
spk_0 and because it involved her figuring out where to gain access to the outside, it involved a plan,
spk_0 it involved her executing a plan. So what does that mean? It means that they know where they are
spk_0 and they have thoughts about what they want to do. And you can see that in wild, so-called wild
spk_0 animals, free living animals who are living more in natural lives, if you take the time to watch
spk_0 them and almost nobody can do that, except for professional people who do that for a living and can
spk_0 spend hours and weeks and many cases years getting to know free living animals and their lives,
spk_0 or who raised wild orphans. I've learned an enormous amount by raising a few wild orphans.
spk_0 And you can see that they have a really complex mental capabilities that have usually been denied
spk_0 to them by us, but they do nonetheless exist. I want to go into a few things about how we overvalue
spk_0 the sense of our intelligence or because of the size of our brain, which I think is true, but I feel,
spk_0 and as you know, intelligence or even consciousness might even exist in different parts of the body,
spk_0 I feel for animals. I want to say on that in terms of the creativity and the storytelling skills
spk_0 of animals. One ground Christmas time, my husband and I were taking a walk and there was this giant
spk_0 crow on a garbage bin eating and my husband was just teasing and he started to imitate what it
spk_0 I don't know, whatever the crow sounded and the crow looked at him, looked at both of us,
spk_0 like what are you looking at? It was like a confrontational thing. Then started crying out,
spk_0 flew up in the sky, crying out. We thought he was calling other birds and then was circling us
spk_0 in the sky. It was a church that's there in the corner and he was kind of always looking back at us
spk_0 and then he got something in the eaves. I thought it was a bit of old hay, but he dropped what it was
spk_0 right next to us on the ground and it was the carcass of a pigeon. I think this is story,
spk_0 daring skills, and he goes to the crow in a sense of humor. Well, certainly that does not seem
spk_0 remotely accidental, right? And whatever the crow might have been trying to express with that,
spk_0 I don't really know, but I would say that that is not an accidental thing.
spk_0 Not at all. So he remembered, I'm guessing it's a here, but remember that and for just a case when
spk_0 he might meet a joker who was trying to imitate him, and you recount many of the examples of
spk_0 creativity or communication across species, whether it's with dolphins or others, just tell us some
spk_0 of those stories. Oh, well, you just see really all the time that they know where they're going,
spk_0 they know who they're with and they know what they're doing. They're very aware of the kinds of
spk_0 decisions that they're making. And in some cases, they're aware of needing to get back to who is in
spk_0 their group or trying to find who is in their group. I mean, just for instance, you know, the whales
spk_0 that we call killer whales or orca whales, they travel about 75 miles a day. Where they travel,
spk_0 the visibility is almost never more than about 50 feet. And yet they go to different destinations
spk_0 that may be hundreds of miles apart, where they've been before. And two or three decades after
spk_0 somebody has started to study a particular group, they will see the exact same individuals still
spk_0 together because they recognize their voices in the ocean when they cannot see each other,
spk_0 and they know who was in their group and what they belong to. And that is not an accident. If a whale
spk_0 is next to the same whale, it was next to 30 years ago, after traveling thousands of miles in the
spk_0 ocean, it's because they have lives. They're not just bumbling around. They're not just unconsciously
spk_0 swimming forward, belping down things that they're motivated to eat. They do understand a lot about
spk_0 what they're doing in the moment. And you know, I'll say this for humans and our brains. I think that
spk_0 in terms of many kinds of things, we are the extreme animal. We're certainly technologically
spk_0 speaking. There's no comparison to what humans can do among all the animals that make some tools.
spk_0 Even though we should keep in mind that for close to 200,000 years, humans who were essentially
spk_0 identical to us had no tools that were more complicated than a bow and arrow. They had nothing
spk_0 that you could call a machine. A lot of that is relatively very, very recent in our history. We
spk_0 tend to think, oh, this is what we do. Humans have computers and airplanes and play sports and
spk_0 things like that. Well, that is all something that is pretty sudden and pretty recent in our own
spk_0 history. For most of the time we were on this planet, our lives were very similar in many ways
spk_0 to the lives of other animals. I think that we probably are capable of longer-range planning that
spk_0 seems that way to me. We certainly have languages with syntax and grammar that allow us to express
spk_0 many more details and do more planning and coordination than many other animals. But that's just a
spk_0 matter of degree, mostly not really a matter of kind. It's a matter of degree. And I think the most
spk_0 crucial thing is that while we are such extraordinary tinkerers that we can keep doing trial and error
spk_0 and figure things out and creating unbelievable kinds of technologies, we are not very smart about
spk_0 what we do with those things or seeing them through to the implications of what happens when we
spk_0 do these things. If we were wiser about it, we would conduct ourselves much more differently than
spk_0 all out what we do call it, all out charge that we conduct. Often we just follow some technology
spk_0 along without worrying about the implications of what will happen ultimately or caring about what
spk_0 will happen ultimately or denying what is happening as a result of the overuse of those technologies
spk_0 or the overpopulation of the world by human beings. And those are causing many of the problems
spk_0 that we have. The other thing that we cannot seem to tame is that we are capable of extraordinary
spk_0 violence, much, much more so than any other animals. And even though most people are very peaceful,
spk_0 most of the time, the amount of violence that we can unleash. And when you look at the reasons for it
spk_0 that are so literally insane are a tremendous lot, I think, on our intelligence. It's almost like
spk_0 as a species, we are just like chimpanzees with automatic weapons or we're just teenagers who
spk_0 are constantly doing stupid and reckless things, but we never seem to collectively as a species
spk_0 really grow out of it. And I think, by and large animals only kill to eat or defend themselves.
spk_0 There's another interesting insight that you've shared that everything that animals do is
spk_0 empirical and logical and as you point out, certainly we are not with all our technologies.
spk_0 Another way of putting it is that if we were as logical and as empirical as all the other animals
spk_0 and were capable of the technology we're capable of, we would not be creating planetary problems
spk_0 that we are not psychologically capable of solving. And that's what we are doing. We are creating
spk_0 planetary problems that we don't solve and that we don't even all acknowledge as the problems
spk_0 that they certainly are. Yes, and speaking of acknowledging these problems, you've talked about
spk_0 psychic numbing before, so the emotional overwhelm of the many horrible things happening,
spk_0 such as species extinction. What can you tell us about balancing the tough realities
spk_0 the world we live in and taking care of ourselves because you speak our myths a lot?
spk_0 Yeah, balancing, I mean, for people who really care about these kinds of things, it can be
spk_0 really tough. And I sometimes think it would quote by E.B. White where he says he wakes up in the morning
spk_0 is torn by the urges to save and to save the world. So, you know, in other words,
spk_0 like to be involved in solving the problems and yet not forget the tremendous beauty of being alive
spk_0 in this miraculous world. This is an issue for me all the time and for many people I know all the time,
spk_0 I do try to balance things because sometimes it gets very distressing or depressing to know about
spk_0 all the problems. But then if I just go outside and go to someplace that is not room and still beautiful
spk_0 and still full of living things, I realize first of all there's a lot left to continue to work for,
spk_0 work on the behalf of continue to fight for. And on the other hand, not all is lost. There are a lot
spk_0 of things that are going on as they should be. And also when I was young, there were things that
spk_0 looked like lost clauses to me, certain birds that were almost completely gone because of pesticides,
spk_0 like oscaras and paragraphalcans and bald eagles. I thought I would never see any of those things when
spk_0 I was a teenager. They were essentially wiped completely out of the region I live in Eastern
spk_0 North America. But because a few people worked to ban the pesticides that were causing all their eggs
spk_0 to break over the last few decades, they repopulated tremendously well. They're really quite
spk_0 common now. We see them all the time. Same as true of whales. Until about five years ago, I saw
spk_0 in my lifetime maybe two whales from shore. And now we see them most of the time in the summer when
spk_0 we go to walk our dogs because fisheries management has allowed many of the certain kind of fish to
spk_0 recover tremendous numbers off our coast. That feeds the whales. That brings the dolphins. It feeds
spk_0 the ospreys who have nests with big chicks in them right right at this time of the summer. The chicks
spk_0 all ready to start flinging. So yes, there are horrible problems and they are real. But there's also
spk_0 really a lot of life left. And that is real too. And sometimes when I feel just everything is simply
spk_0 too distressing and I need a break. It pays to put things in perspective and realize that
spk_0 my personal life is a very privileged one. I have essentially all the opportunities
spk_0 available to a human being at this time in history. I've been in places where people have almost
spk_0 nothing. And being offered money to kill an elephant is something that is almost impossible
spk_0 to say no to. I don't have those dilemmas. I don't have to kill elephants in order to
spk_0 feed a family. If I feel really depressed, I have the opportunity to pour myself a glass of wine
spk_0 or go out and get some ice cream. And I think it's really important to keep that in perspective.
spk_0 Sometimes I talk to people say, oh, it's too depressing. I can't face it. And I think, well,
spk_0 you know, really, you don't really have to do any of these hard things. So why don't you contribute
spk_0 a little bit to what you can do toward the solutions? Join some group, say some things,
spk_0 do a little something, contribute what you can instead of saying that it's too overwhelming for
spk_0 you. I feel like I can't justify the self-indulgence of saying it's too overwhelming because I live
spk_0 very privileged life. I've seen a lot of these really terrible things firsthand. And that gives me
spk_0 the perspective of understanding where I stand in the overall picture. And that helps me, I think,
spk_0 with this issue of balancing that you're asking about. And I wanted to bring the idea of the
spk_0 cultural diversity and knowledge of species that you also talk about into this conversation and
spk_0 ask you how are human impacts to the natural world changing or shaping what you would call this
spk_0 cultural diversity and cultural knowledge of species? Well, humans are putting unbelievable
spk_0 pressure on almost every living thing. Almost every wild population in the world is that it's
spk_0 lowest level that it's ever been in since humans appeared on the planet. And that has certainly
spk_0 accelerated in the last 100 years or so, accelerated greatly. So all of these creatures have to
spk_0 figure out a way of coping with our presence. And if they can't, then what happens is their population
spk_0 disappears. If enough populations disappear, the species goes extinct. In a few cases,
spk_0 animals have adapted to our presence in various ways. Some of them create conflict because
spk_0 humans invade their area, they plant farms, and then the animals eat what's growing in the farm.
spk_0 And that's a way that they are trying to adapt that creates conflict that is often fatal for them.
spk_0 Sometimes they adapt very well to our presence. One thing that I've noticed is that
spk_0 certain birds, particularly that were very shy around people, they simply learn over generations to
spk_0 tolerate the presence of people. The first time I ever saw a bold eagle's nest,
spk_0 the eagles got off the nest and disappeared while we were about 300 yards away.
spk_0 They don't do that around here anymore. The eagles that have started to move back into this
spk_0 region, Long Island, New York where I live, often are nesting in very close proximity to people.
spk_0 Even they find some secluded little place in a wood lot where they can have some privacy,
spk_0 or they nest kind of right out in the open at the edge of a salt marsh where people go by,
spk_0 and they're just getting used to the idea that people are part of their landscape.
spk_0 We don't have people who shoot them routinely anymore like in the past, so that's a way that people
spk_0 have accommodated to their presence. Not that we deserve much congratulations for simply not
spk_0 killing everything that's in sight. There's a pair of eagles that are nesting right behind a
spk_0 post office, not far from here. One of my neighbors lives on the shore of a nice quiet bay on the
spk_0 east end of Long Island. She caught some fish and put the fillade out fish racks on the edge of the
spk_0 shore, thinking maybe the gulls would like to pick at them, and a pair of adult eagles found them.
spk_0 We've never seen anything like that before, and those eagles just started coming back every day,
spk_0 looking for more fish scraps from my neighbors. In some ways, these are the accommodations that
spk_0 are being made. They kind of go two ways. People are looking toward more coexistence and are reacting
spk_0 less violently to some of these things, and in exchange or in return or in response,
spk_0 many of the animals that used to be very, very shy about being nearby are doing rather well
spk_0 in the suburbs. Those are just a few examples, I think. Of course, the industry not so very
spk_0 long ago, well, I guess over 100 years ago, of course, was wailing then in Long Island because it
spk_0 was built upon that industry and a few others. That's true. There were commercial whaling ports
spk_0 on Long Island. Many of them actually did not hunt whales around Long Island because there were
spk_0 one left for probably the last 100 years of those industries. They left Long Island and they left
spk_0 New England and they headed either to the Antarctic or into the Pacific, and they just continued to
spk_0 essentially deplete the whales everywhere that they went. But protections for whales started going
spk_0 in in the mid-1940s and by the late 1980s, we had near total protection from hunting for the whales.
spk_0 They have other problems. They get tangled up in lobster and crab trap lines. They get hit by ships.
spk_0 They do have other problems, but people don't intentionally hunt them anymore. That has made
spk_0 a very big difference. My last few trips out on the ocean, I've seen numerous whales and dolphins
spk_0 on each trip. That's a very wonderful thing and also contributes a lot to my sense of balance.
spk_0 You know, that despite these problems, there are some things that are coping and coping successfully
spk_0 with us. As I think of Moby Dick that was written by Hermelva was a local, I guess,
spk_0 Cyan Carver there. And this is a kind of warning call of how we should respect the environment and
spk_0 our oceans. So in all of your travels locally and around the world, how have you seen the oceans
spk_0 transformed over the decades? I guess there are three big transformations. One is that many of the
spk_0 fish are really depleted. There's a big exception and that is in coastal waters of the US because of
spk_0 the change in the law that I worked on a lot in the 1990s. Many of the coastal fish populations in
spk_0 the US waters are more abundant now than they were. The management has really improved a lot.
spk_0 A fish that swim out of our federal waters into international waters are much less abundant than
spk_0 they were when I was a kid. Some of them are recovering a little. In a lot of the rest of the world,
spk_0 depletion is really deep and still major. So depletion is one main thing that I've seen as a big change.
spk_0 Another thing I've seen as a big change is water temperature. The oceans are warming and the
spk_0 temperatures in our coastal waters locally here are about 10 degrees warmer at this time of the year,
spk_0 early August, then they were in the 1990s. So in let's say 25 years, the coastal ocean waters are
spk_0 about 10 degrees Fahrenheit warmer. That's a really big difference for ocean animals. We have lost
spk_0 several species that used to be here all summer long. It's too hot for them.
spk_0 And we have gained some species that we never saw before on Long Island. They're now here
spk_0 very regularly. So the ocean is a different ocean because of the way that it has warm.
spk_0 Coral reefs are severely stressed by the warming. Many of them have died and are in the process of
spk_0 dying because of heat stress and the combination of heat stress and depletion. If you deplete
spk_0 the fish on a coral reef that eat algae, the algae grows. And if the algae grows a lot,
spk_0 it smothers the coral and the corals die. And what used to be a beautiful coral reef filled with fish
spk_0 turns into an algae-coded rubble field. I've seen quite a lot of that in different places.
spk_0 And the other change is there's a lot more plastic everywhere on coral reefs on the
spk_0 remotest beaches in the world, in the ocean floating around. I would say that problem is
spk_0 worse in the tropics in my experience than it is here where we live. We have a little bit more of
spk_0 an ethic about trying to be careful with our waste. We don't just throw things into the waterways
spk_0 because the rivers used to be much, much more polluted in North America when I was a kid.
spk_0 We have the clean water, a lot of the waterways are no longer filled with garbage headed out to sea,
spk_0 but in a lot of the world, that's exactly the way it is. They're filled with garbage headed out to sea.
spk_0 Not only was there very little plastic in use when I was born, but the population of the
spk_0 world, the human population of the world has tripled since I was born. So the world is a different
spk_0 place than it was and I actually remember and I've witnessed and I can testify to many of those
spk_0 major changes. Carl Sipina's words in this conversation truly moved me and provided me with a new
spk_0 sense of the wilderness towards the natural world. It was really lovely to have a conversation that
spk_0 deeply intertwined the beauty of the animal world with the impacts of climate change on it.
spk_0 Professor Sipina's words reminded me of the resilience of animals and how they managed to adapt
spk_0 to situations that they should not have to. It calls to mind the injustices of what the animal
spk_0 world has to go through in a responsive anthropogenic changes. Yes, animals have adapted to so many
spk_0 events and changes throughout history, but the damage we humans are doing now is occurring on a
spk_0 devastating scale that is entirely avoidable. I found the conversation that occurs later in the
spk_0 podcasts about how animals create meaning in their life are really striking one. Often we
spk_0 human see ourselves as the only beings capable of having a meaningful life. I think this helps us
spk_0 justify the changes we make to the natural world. Thinking that we are the only ones emotionally
spk_0 processing and understanding the changes means that we only have to be responsible for our own emotions.
spk_0 We don't have to consider the thoughts or emotions of other beings if we don't think they exist.
spk_0 Knowing that animals create meanings and are capable of emotion adds an extra layer of complexities
spk_0 to the changes we're forcing the natural world through. It also adds a new layer of
spk_0 all towards the natural world. To know that animals such as whales create bonds with each other,
spk_0 that they are able to recognize each other's voices and always travel with the same pod. It's so
spk_0 beautiful. There is always so much more to discover about these wonderful creatures of all kinds.
spk_0 It is just tragic to know that we are losing them at a faster rate that we can even know some of
spk_0 them exist. We are losing so much by them going extinct. Not only can animals give us scientific
spk_0 insight into solving problems in the field of medicine, for example, among other fields,
spk_0 but we can also learn so much from them in the way they live their lives. Later in the podcast,
spk_0 Professor Safina talks about the Safina Center. The work that the center is doing gracefully
spk_0 merges the beauty of the natural world with the need to save it. They look at these really
spk_0 existential questions about the world's human should claim the world. Because the
spk_0 extinction of many species is really an existential question for us as well. Is this who we want to be in
spk_0 the world? Is this space we want to take up? What do we value? How do we change?
spk_0 And Professor Safina will talk about this later in the episode, the way we navigate through the
spk_0 world individually and as a species is guided by our values. I found his answer to one of the
spk_0 questions about the role the economics playing climate change action, particularly poignant.
spk_0 You will hear him say that the way we're living has a very high cost, not factored in the price
spk_0 that needs to be considered, and that at its core, bringing economics into the climate change
spk_0 conversation is simply a matter of values. We just have to decide if we value money over
spk_0 habitat destruction, deforestation, extinction, and more. Although, of course, when I say we,
spk_0 I don't mean everyone. And Professor Safina doesn't either. Then she highlights and discusses the
spk_0 systems put in place to ensure the illusion of infinite growth on a finite planet.
spk_0 Although the average person's individual actions will not shape the fate of the planet either way,
spk_0 we must all reconsider our values and mobilize to preserve the planet and all its wonderful species.
spk_0 We can use the amazing stories and the sense of bewilderment that Professor Safina has
spk_0 gifted us today as a way to move forward and urge us to save this wonderful world.
spk_0 Now, let's get back to the episode. And some tell us about the mission and objectives of the
spk_0 Safina Center. Yeah, well, what we're trying to do here at the Safina Center is to make an emotional
spk_0 connection with people between what we know scientifically and factually, and what the implications
spk_0 of that are, what needs to be done, where are we headed, where will we get to if we don't change
spk_0 course right now? There are plenty of reports and there's a lot of information about all of this
spk_0 stuff. That is not what we are about because what we realize is that information is not really
spk_0 what gets people to do things. What gets people to do things is their values. They filter information
spk_0 through their values. You can tell somebody about something you think is a terrible problem.
spk_0 And they might say, yes, that's a terrible problem. And other people say, I don't care about that.
spk_0 So we're trying to make people care, motivate people to respond, to do what it is that they can do
spk_0 through our work. And what our work is is we make fact-based creative products, meaning books,
spk_0 films, images, paintings, sound art, those kinds of things. And when I say we, it's basically our
spk_0 fellows. We have people who we call our fellows. We help to raise the profile of people whose work
spk_0 is excellent. They're making an emotional connection. We provide some money to help them continue
spk_0 their work. And this is in a sense, you know, what I try to do with my writing and my speaking,
spk_0 trying to find people who are like-minded and like-hearted and resonate with those kinds of efforts.
spk_0 And that's what makes up the crew of the Saphina Center. We're very far flung. We don't all work
spk_0 in the same place. We have some people in Europe. We have some people in North America. We have
spk_0 people from Africa. We have a couple of people from Hawaii. So we're pretty spread out.
spk_0 Definitely. We need to include the global South and well, all directions, really.
spk_0 Yes, all directions at all scales. Yes.
spk_0 And it's great to see how you're framing this need for change through an emotional and a
spk_0 moral lens. I wanted to ask what are your thoughts on shaping this need for change
spk_0 through an economic lens in order to convince certain groups of people that just won't be swayed.
spk_0 Well, I think we're trying to work a little more basically there because economics only reflect
spk_0 values. The prices we put on things and what we're willing to pay for things, how people
spk_0 value in a monetary sense. That is all arbitrary and it just reflects our values.
spk_0 So we're trying to work on values.
spk_0 Values, I think, are the fundamental thing. If you resonate with the values we're expressing,
spk_0 you would feel differently about the prices of things. Just for instance, oil and coal are
spk_0 really very cheap. They're priced cheaply. The price, the value and the cost of things are
spk_0 three really different things. So the price to boil and coal is very cheap. But the cost of those
spk_0 things involves, well, let's just say coal. So one example, it involves blowing the tops off of
spk_0 mountains throughout Appalachia, occasionally burying a few people, giving lots of workers lung
spk_0 disease, changing the heat balance of the entire planet and acidifying the ocean. That's the cost
spk_0 of it. It's nowhere in the price. So we say, oh, this is cheap. That's because we only have a
spk_0 transactional pricing on these things so that the companies can get us to buy that stuff because
spk_0 we've created a life for ourselves where we all use it. We're all complicit to one extent or
spk_0 another. And they price it so that the better options remain more expensive so that we continue
spk_0 to do things that actually have a very, very high cost. If we talk about oil, remember that it's not
spk_0 just gasoline, it's all the plastic, essentially all the plastic that's created is created by oil
spk_0 companies. That's all part of the cost, but it's not in the price. Why? Because they make things that
spk_0 are designed to be thrown away. So the cost is what happens when they're thrown away. Everything and
spk_0 everybody that suffers from all of that garbage that is essentially eternal, but it's nowhere
spk_0 reflected in the price. If our values were different and if we really understood this in a much more
spk_0 complete way, then those things would be very, very expensive. They'd be prohibitively expensive
spk_0 because we would understand that ruining the world and hurting people is something that you can't
spk_0 really morally put a price on. And we always look to these indexes as well about GDP, whereas
spk_0 people are now coming around to think about this global national happiness index. We're measuring
spk_0 that. Yeah. The person who invented GDP, gross domestic product explicitly said, this is only a
spk_0 measure of the size of the economy. It's not a measure of how good things are, but everybody ignored
spk_0 that. And they just use it to measure the size of the economy. And we have this Ponzi scheme,
spk_0 really, where the current economic system is completely predicated on the size that everything
spk_0 must keep growing and getting bigger on a planet that is not getting bigger. And the economy is
spk_0 based on the idea that you have to put more and more materials through the system. That is what
spk_0 growth is. That is not improvement. So, you know, like growth would be, let's say, bigger schools
spk_0 and more schools, but not caring about what is taught, whereas improvement would be better education,
spk_0 more comprehensive education, people who understand things better and feel included,
spk_0 that would be an improvement rather than growth. Our economy doesn't really care about education.
spk_0 What we care about is making consumers in the United States. We have free education,
spk_0 a form of socialism for everybody until grade 12. At grade 12, they're not really skilled at
spk_0 anything except buying stuff. And then we say, okay, that's the end of your free education.
spk_0 If you want to be a better citizen and more educated, you're on your own now. Good luck.
spk_0 And that has a lot to do with the pricing of things and where we put our money
spk_0 based entirely on our values. If we really cared about having an informed citizenry that was
spk_0 skilled and creative, we would simply extend free education through college. But we don't care
spk_0 about that. We only care about educating people enough to be consumers. And you are a teacher,
spk_0 and I believe that you value teaching and mentorship that you've had over the years.
spk_0 And there is an argument for maybe this apprenticeship or guild model that I think can be so helpful
spk_0 because the education doesn't always ensure a career. And it's kind of nice to be a member of a family.
spk_0 Just tell us about your teaching and learning experience.
spk_0 Well, I think in a sense, I teach at different levels. I think my books and my articles are just
spk_0 an attempt to share information and my thoughts about how I see the value of this world that we're
spk_0 in, this miracle that we live on. I also teach in a classroom. I teach graduate students who are
spk_0 getting mostly, they are getting a master's degree in ocean conservation and policy. I speak a lot
spk_0 at conferences or on podcasts such as this one. And our fellows program at the Sifina Center is
spk_0 also in a sense that I think you know, you just indicated it's sort of an apprentice guild in a
spk_0 way. It literally provides some fellowship like like minded people finding out about
spk_0 one another and hooking up to realize that we're not all working alone in our little corners because
spk_0 it can be a little lonely sometimes doing things like writing a book at your desk day after day for
spk_0 months. You know, it's good to touch base with and feel part of a larger family. I think we do that
spk_0 for ourselves and we do that for our fellows with our work at the Sifina Center. So I see it at
spk_0 different levels and I think obviously the most crucial job in any society is teaching.
spk_0 That's the only thing that can keep a society longer than one generation. And there are many,
spk_0 many really important things that need to be conveyed in our culture at this time. So we're doing
spk_0 our little part to do that. So thinking about AI, you and I, we're talking about animal
spk_0 sentience and different things like that. But as you think about the future education, we say if
spk_0 we won't have as much employment if that is outsourced to AI, then maybe there's a way forward
spk_0 that we can find ways that we can be lifelong learners. I don't know what the answer to that
spk_0 question is, but it's something that we have to consider. Yeah, there's a balance somewhere to be
spk_0 struck between let's just say mechanization, never mind AI. I mean, this goes back literally to
spk_0 the Luddites who were violently opposing the mechanization of the weaving industry because they were
spk_0 weavers. And society has to try to figure out what a society is for and what a culture is for.
spk_0 Is it to include people or to sell things to people and keep them on the fringes? I think there are
spk_0 a lot of jobs that are mechanized, a lot of functions that are mechanized that humans cannot
spk_0 really do with human dignity, but there are also a lot of people who are seeing their livelihoods,
spk_0 their meaningful livelihoods eroded by mechanization, including artificial intelligence.
spk_0 And no thought is really given, I think, to balancing that. I don't see it reflected in
spk_0 discussions about policies. What I see is just a huge push by the people developing the technologies
spk_0 to basically get the corporations who produce things to use the technologies and not care about
spk_0 employment levels in the culture and in society. I don't know where the balance should be,
spk_0 but it's not where it is. I always thinking about the future of work and if we don't work,
spk_0 what is our purpose and what is our value? If that's taken away, I don't know what happens.
spk_0 And that is distressing in itself to imagine the loss of livelihood and purpose. I can only
spk_0 imagine what happens for animals when their habitats are taken away. Well, what happens is those
spk_0 populations disappear. They can't really, some people say, oh, they knock down these woods over
spk_0 here. So all the animals had to move. Well, they can't move because they'll crowd in on other
spk_0 animals that are already there and then they'll fight for the territory that they need, which is
spk_0 usually already occupied. And then the population declined. That's the mechanism of extinction right
spk_0 there. You lose numbers. We've lost to enormous numbers. For instance, since I was in high school,
spk_0 there are about one third fewer birds in North America. Many of them are not considered
spk_0 endangered because there are still a lot of them, but that kind of a decline is to me as a catastrophe.
spk_0 And what did we get in return is civilization much better than it was. I don't see it as being
spk_0 much better than it was. I see it as being poor really and less enriched by the natural beauty
spk_0 because those declines are in most things all around us. They're very, very evident. But anyway,
spk_0 that's not really what you were trying to ask me about. The way I think about the meaning of life
spk_0 for other animals is that the different animals have different mental and emotional capacities.
spk_0 And the meaning of life for them is to live up to who they are, what they're capable of. So very
spk_0 social animals are who they are as they need to live in a social group where they will know who
spk_0 they are and they're always together. Other animals need to just be able to hold on to their own
spk_0 territory and raise their young. And that's what their psychology is primed to do. But if they are
spk_0 unable to continue because their habitat is eroded, it's toxified, individuals die, they lose
spk_0 their mates, their young ones will die. Well, then that is not life as they are prepared to experience it.
spk_0 And, you know, I can give you various examples of that. Just for instance, I mentioned the killer
spk_0 wills, the Orcas of the Pacific Northwest that live along the coast of Washington and Oregon,
spk_0 essentially all of their babies die. And this has been happening in the last 10 or 20 years. And
spk_0 that's largely because they don't have enough to eat because the salmon that they rely on are
spk_0 really depleted because of not just overfishing, but the degradation of the rivers that the salmon
spk_0 spawn in and that produce the salmon. And the other thing is the unbelievable toxic load from
spk_0 accumulating toxic chemicals with every bite of food. And the young ones cannot thrive and they die.
spk_0 So that's an example, I think, of the kind of thing that we're all trying to grow through the fog
spk_0 and understand something we don't understand right now. Exactly. And you've also written about the
spk_0 great feats of loyalty and fidelity and courtship. You've written about the albatross. Sometimes we
spk_0 feel like we're the only ones who could love and be loyal, but really in the animal world, there's
spk_0 many examples of that. And the nonhuman animal world, there are a lot of examples of bonding,
spk_0 a lot of pair bonding and a lot of bonding between adults and young and some species between
spk_0 siblings or among one generation and all their children, like elephants and sperm whales,
spk_0 just for instance, some of the apes, those animals tend to stay with family members for their entire
spk_0 lives. So those are emotional bonds. Wolves are the same thing. A variety of animals, by no means
spk_0 all, but a variety of animals more than you tend to think. Yes. And as you say, the communication is
spk_0 deep and complex. And sometimes I feel like our language hides the truth. I don't know the instances
spk_0 of animal world, but sometimes I feel like the emotional truth can be hidden by all of our
spk_0 complex vocabulary. Well, partly because our vocabulary is not complex enough. For instance,
spk_0 in English, you referred to a person as who, and you referred to every single other thing,
spk_0 whether it's a chair or a rock or a bird, as it, in some of the Native American languages,
spk_0 maybe all, I'm not sure, but definitely in some, there's a different pronoun for something
spk_0 that is or was alive compared to something that was never alive. That's a really important
spk_0 distinction. Our language devalues living things by speaking of them only as objects and not as
spk_0 beings. That's the commodification that you're speaking of. And rocks are alive or were alive.
spk_0 They're just to send it slow life, right? And we're fast-ly. Well, that's a matter of fact.
spk_0 I guess you and I understand the facts a little differently. I would say a rock is not alive.
spk_0 It has no metabolism. It is not capable of repairing itself. It is not capable of procreation
spk_0 and creating little rocks that will grow into big rocks. That is what life does. And life is
spk_0 categorically different from non-living things. So the way that I understand the world is that
spk_0 there are living things only on earth as far as we know. And there are non-living things
spk_0 throughout the universe and a lot of non-living things on earth. I think the distinction is gigantic
spk_0 and hugely important. I don't believe that rock is truly alive. Some things live on it. And it's
spk_0 certainly it's a home for many things. Of course, yes, that's certainly true. And contribute to the
spk_0 geochemical cycles, you know, geology is really the basis of where living things can be.
spk_0 In a sense, all of life traces back to geology. And the fact that how the world changes and creates
spk_0 opportunities for life to fit in and around. So all of that is very, very important.
spk_0 Yeah, we feel that the nature is not below us and we are not above it. And I guess we all share
spk_0 the same kind of cosmology. We have to find our common language. So, you know, as you think about
spk_0 the future and the many challenges we face and the kind of world we're leaving the next generation,
spk_0 what have been some important life lessons and teachers for you? And what would you like young people
spk_0 to know, preserve and remember? Well, for me, the living world is enormously enriching to human
spk_0 life. I think that was the first thing that I felt. I don't think I articulated it that way,
spk_0 but I just loved animals. I loved all the different things that he did, all the different ways
spk_0 they looked, how you can never know enough about them. They're always just totally fascinating.
spk_0 I think that was the first thing that I learned. I think the second thing that I learned
spk_0 was that they're not here for us. They're just here, like we're just here. They're of this world
spk_0 as much as we are of this world. They really have the same claim to life and death and the
spk_0 circle of being. I think that might be the second thing I learned. And I think the thing that I'm
spk_0 constantly learning and appreciating more and more is that life on this planet is an absolute
spk_0 miracle in literal terms because we have laws of physics like the speed of light or gravitational
spk_0 attraction. And the laws of physics are the same throughout the universe. The speed of light is
spk_0 the speed of light everywhere. Gravitational attraction works the same everywhere. Those are laws
spk_0 of physics. The word we have for something that breaks the laws of physics is miracle and living
spk_0 things because they don't follow the second law of thermodynamics very carefully. They break that law
spk_0 by becoming more and more complex. The second law of thermodynamics says that the universe tends
spk_0 toward disorder. Well, a living thing is the exact opposite of disorder. It's self-ordering,
spk_0 self-recreating, self-prepetuating, self-proliferating. It breaks the laws of physics. That is
spk_0 literally a miracle and the only place in the universe where we have detected living things is
spk_0 this planet. Are there living things elsewhere among the billions and billions and billions of stars?
spk_0 Quite possibly, but life is at least extremely rare because everywhere people who've spent their
spk_0 careers looking for it, they have not found any. So we tend to take living for granted. I think
spk_0 that might be the biggest limitation of human intelligence is to not understand with all and
spk_0 reverence and love that we live in a miracle, that we are part of, and that we have the ability to
spk_0 either nurture or destroy. Exactly. And also don't go looking for the miracle. You are the miracle.
spk_0 And it's so important to have a positive message in a negative world. So thank you, Carl,
spk_0 Safina, for your life of compassion and all you do to help us understand animals, what it's like to
spk_0 be behind their eyes and imagine what it's like to live in their bodies. And what the Safina
spk_0 Center does for fusing scientific understanding and emotional connection to inspire us to respect
spk_0 and live in harmony with animals. We all live on one planet. We call home. Thank you for adding
spk_0 your voice to one planet podcast and the creative process. Thank you for making it possible for me to
spk_0 add my voice, Mia. And thank you, Evelyn, as well.
spk_0 When planet podcast is supported by the Yan Mishalsky Foundation, this interview was conducted by
spk_0 Mia Funk and Evelyn Mall with the participation of collaborating universities and students.
spk_0 The associate interview producer on this podcast was Evelyn Mall. Digital media coordinators
spk_0 are Jacob A. Prysler and Megan Hagen-Murth. The music is written and performed by Juan Sanchez.
spk_0 We hope you've enjoyed this program. If you would like to get involved in one planet podcast and
spk_0 be part of the Climate Change solution, just drop us a line at teamat1planetpodcast.org. Thank you
spk_0 for listening.