Episode 157 - October 3, 2025 - Episode Artwork
Technology

Episode 157 - October 3, 2025

In Episode 157 of Biotech Hangout, the hosts discuss the recent developments in the biotech industry, including President Trump's new healthcare initiatives and their implications for drug pricin...

Episode 157 - October 3, 2025
Episode 157 - October 3, 2025
Technology • 0:00 / 0:00

Interactive Transcript

spk_0 You're listening to Biotech Hangout,
spk_0 a live and unadvied weekly discussion
spk_0 of all the latest news on our industry
spk_0 with a group of biotech insiders.
spk_0 I'm Eric Schmidt and my co-host today are Sam Fizzelli,
spk_0 Brian Scorney and your own Werber.
spk_0 For more information about our hosts and guest speakers,
spk_0 we're to listen to the most recent episode.
spk_0 Please go to biotechhangout.com.
spk_0 All right, guys, quite the wonderful week.
spk_0 It feels like in Biotech with the XBI
spk_0 breaking out into new ground.
spk_0 And maybe the beginnings of a true bull market type
spk_0 rally here.
spk_0 The news flow as we'll talk about was a little bit more mixed,
spk_0 at least on a fundamental side.
spk_0 We didn't have the best of data releases,
spk_0 but let's start with the macro,
spk_0 which I think is really the bigger news of the week.
spk_0 And Sam, perhaps you can introduce everything that's going on
spk_0 with Trump, the White House, MFN, pricing tariffs, et cetera.
spk_0 Yeah, thanks, Eric.
spk_0 It was quite an event that we, I'm sure pretty much everybody
spk_0 has watched it.
spk_0 We had Albert Burla, all the key healthcare figures
spk_0 within the administration.
spk_0 And of course, President Trump,
spk_0 so the CEO of Pfizer and President Trump,
spk_0 presenting essentially the first of what
spk_0 is expected to be many or at least several deals
spk_0 between farmer companies and the administration.
spk_0 And the likelihood is that they are going to have
spk_0 this pretty much the same template.
spk_0 And we characterize this at our end as a win, win,
spk_0 and the lose situation.
spk_0 And I think we'll probably almost certainly talk about all of that.
spk_0 So the win pretty much comes from the farmer industry
spk_0 and the president.
spk_0 Although, of course, all of these things
spk_0 depend on the absolute details that we get to.
spk_0 But a couple of things that we pretty much
spk_0 with Tibet was a very drunkenian,
spk_0 most favored nation pricing strategy,
spk_0 which was good to see that didn't come to fruition.
spk_0 And also the 100% tariffs that the president had announced
spk_0 to come in force on the 1st of October,
spk_0 where obviously put Tibet because these deals
spk_0 are starting to roll out.
spk_0 So that's great news.
spk_0 And of course, as you can see from the share price reactions,
spk_0 in general, the market and investors have seen this
spk_0 as positive for the farmer industry.
spk_0 So what did we get?
spk_0 We got President Trump got essentially two key targets
spk_0 of what he was looking for.
spk_0 One is all drugs sold in the US should be made in the US.
spk_0 I think a lot of farmer companies were already going down that route.
spk_0 So that's great.
spk_0 And I think a vast majority of drugs are already manufacturing
spk_0 in the US.
spk_0 Of course, we can all then discuss what does that mean
spk_0 to be in verticomers manufacturing in the US?
spk_0 Where does that decision gets made?
spk_0 In terms of is it filling finish?
spk_0 Is it the final product?
spk_0 Is it where is it?
spk_0 So let's leave that to discussion later.
spk_0 We get some job increases.
spk_0 And this is culminated over the past few months
spk_0 in what we've tottered up to be about $432 billion of ledges
spk_0 by farmer companies and some large biotechs,
spk_0 which of course include ongoing R&D, ongoing pap X,
spk_0 and some new manufacturing facilities, et cetera.
spk_0 The US gets a possibility of at least
spk_0 aligning non-US prices closer to the US
spk_0 when we're going to see how that would work.
spk_0 Interestingly, I was just on a call with a UK physician,
spk_0 POL earlier today.
spk_0 And I asked him, if I gave a US survey of block prices in the UK,
spk_0 would you be able to fill it?
spk_0 Would you be able to fill it?
spk_0 And he said, well, no.
spk_0 Because nobody really knows what the prices are in each area
spk_0 has got its own situation.
spk_0 And in fact, a lot of farmers are allowed
spk_0 to give out the net prices that they pay.
spk_0 So that's interesting as to where these calculations
spk_0 are going to be made.
spk_0 Nevertheless, that is a positive.
spk_0 And I think farmer companies are almost certainly
spk_0 going to end up launching every product,
spk_0 not the majority, which has been the case.
spk_0 First in the US now, because you want to set the price there
spk_0 and go and hope that the Europeans and other countries
spk_0 pay their fair share.
spk_0 And it seems like the majority of the impact
spk_0 is going to be on Medicaid and Medicare.
spk_0 I wouldn't call it an impact, because I think what we're going
spk_0 to end up with is actually potentially more volume
spk_0 going through these various channels, particularly
spk_0 the director consumer channels.
spk_0 And let's see how that all pans out.
spk_0 And lastly, so those are wins for the administration,
spk_0 win for the farmer industry.
spk_0 I'm sure there's a lot more detailed folks
spk_0 I'm going to talk about in a minute.
spk_0 The lose is Europe.
spk_0 And the lose is in this form.
spk_0 If you have lost your product in the US at a price X,
spk_0 you go to Europe and say I'm very sorry,
spk_0 but you've got to have to pay at least the net price
spk_0 equivalent of X.
spk_0 So let's say that's a 30% discount, not 70%, not 70%,
spk_0 80%, not 60%.
spk_0 And Europe goes, OK, fine.
spk_0 I'm going to increase my drug budget, which
spk_0 is great for farmer number one.
spk_0 No, I'm going to tell you what I'm going to do.
spk_0 I'm not going to increase my drug budgets.
spk_0 I'm going to accept your price, but I'm going to have
spk_0 to restrict the drug even more.
spk_0 So that's another lose.
spk_0 And that's, again, good for farmer,
spk_0 because they get the higher margin, even if the volume is lower.
spk_0 And then it gets the same revenue.
spk_0 And then, of course, the other one is, which is the worst case
spk_0 scenario, which doesn't really account
spk_0 that there's a win for farmer, but certainly a lose for European
spk_0 setup and patience, is that they go, no, actually,
spk_0 we don't want the drug.
spk_0 Now, in some cases, I think that might happen.
spk_0 I think if you had a situation,
spk_0 I'm not particularly picking on say oral surge,
spk_0 but let's say the oral surge come along
spk_0 with essentially a major convenience factor, which
spk_0 will translate to better patient adherence,
spk_0 and of course longer term, better outcomes.
spk_0 But let's say that's welcome.
spk_0 And the companies are going, well,
spk_0 the competition is essentially generic.
spk_0 So we're going to have to be a lot higher price.
spk_0 And I think that's the sort of situation
spk_0 where we're going to have to think about how
spk_0 to be modeled that going forward.
spk_0 So let me leave it at that.
spk_0 And Eric, you can bring in everyone
spk_0 to see how they want to.
spk_0 Yeah, wonderful recap.
spk_0 Thanks.
spk_0 And I should have also introduced Brad Lunkard.
spk_0 I didn't realize Brad was going to be joining us as a speaker
spk_0 as well, but welcome, Brad.
spk_0 For the broader group following Sam's terrific recap,
spk_0 is this a win-win win?
spk_0 Are we kind of done now with this massive macro overhang
spk_0 around drug pricing that's really been weighing on the group?
spk_0 Or are we still worried about something else coming into the fore?
spk_0 Well, I think in today, these days,
spk_0 you should always expect the unexpected.
spk_0 So I wouldn't say it's a guarantee of smooth sailing going
spk_0 forward.
spk_0 But I do think it was a genius move by Burla.
spk_0 And if you see some like Wall Street Journal reporting,
spk_0 it seems clear that this is something
spk_0 that he and Pfizer did on their own.
spk_0 This wasn't a coordinated negotiation
spk_0 by the industry, so to speak, or all the other major companies.
spk_0 I really think that he's in a unique position.
spk_0 I think that Albert Burla is arguably the only pharmacy
spk_0 who really has like name recognition and gravitas
spk_0 with the general public, given how visible he was during COVID.
spk_0 And just the way he literally tweets and continues
spk_0 to kind of speak publicly these days,
spk_0 I think that most people don't know who the other big pharmacies
spk_0 are.
spk_0 So I think it had a little bit of an element of gravitas
spk_0 to the announcement because of who he is.
spk_0 And I agree with everything that Sam said,
spk_0 and I think that he basically gave away almost nothing,
spk_0 and he gave Trump the political victory that he needed.
spk_0 And I think that's really the definition of a great deal.
spk_0 And now, Pfizer and arguably our industry,
spk_0 if all of the other company, Science Similar deals,
spk_0 have a little bit of pressure off for the next few years,
spk_0 and can worry less about legacy products
spk_0 and focus on investing and the revenue streams
spk_0 that new products are going to have.
spk_0 So I think it was a good deal for our industry.
spk_0 I think he was the right person to do it.
spk_0 I think he was arguably the only person
spk_0 that could have gone first in this way.
spk_0 So my biggest reaction to all of that
spk_0 was like, thank you Albert Burla for basically doing all of us
spk_0 a big favor and also scoring our industry a PR win
spk_0 to the public, making us all look like what we should be
spk_0 trying to look like that we're trying to do things
spk_0 to help people out there.
spk_0 So I thought it was a truly a great news item for all of us.
spk_0 Brian, you're on, what's the impact on biotech?
spk_0 We mentioned that the XBI is breaking out into new levels.
spk_0 We haven't seen, I think, really since 2001,
spk_0 are we in a biotech full market
spk_0 or generalists gonna be interested
spk_0 with some of this new slow binders?
spk_0 I think we're in, I think we're certainly in a rotation
spk_0 to biotech.
spk_0 I mean, it just seems like over the last couple of weeks,
spk_0 there's been this awakening to healthcare being,
spk_0 kind of a very valuable undervalued sector
spk_0 amongst a lot of overvalued sectors.
spk_0 And that's sort of bled into biotech,
spk_0 which has been arguably one of the bigger underperformers
spk_0 in healthcare, which is one of the biggest underperforming
spk_0 sectors over the last few years.
spk_0 So it certainly feels like at minimal,
spk_0 somewhat of a reversion to more of normalcy.
spk_0 I mean, it's hard to say bull market, right?
spk_0 I mean, it's definitely a two month bull market
spk_0 relative to where we are, but it's still a relative
spk_0 bear market to where we are in a performance basis
spk_0 via screen back to like 2020, of course.
spk_0 But it does feel different, right?
spk_0 I mean, to Brad's comment, I mean,
spk_0 I tend to agree like you always expect the unexpected,
spk_0 particularly with this administration,
spk_0 but it does seem like we're in a bit of an environment
spk_0 where like good news is good news and bad news is good news.
spk_0 And people are using any reason to sort of be,
spk_0 at least a little more invested in the sector.
spk_0 How durable is that going to be?
spk_0 You know, I think there's a long way to go just to revert
spk_0 to sort of more of a normal valuation basis
spk_0 across a lot of these names.
spk_0 So, you know, will it, will we go into like really
spk_0 the fanfare of a bull market?
spk_0 I think that remains to be seen,
spk_0 but there's still a lot of upside
spk_0 even if it doesn't go into that type of dynamic.
spk_0 Yeah, I mean, I totally agree.
spk_0 So I'm, and I'm sure you guys can all back me up.
spk_0 I'm happy to announce that we're getting
spk_0 in generalist in-bounds, and which is unusual.
spk_0 And these are real generalists.
spk_0 Like not the biotech sort of fringe generalist,
spk_0 but real generalists were calling,
spk_0 not knowing a lot about the sector.
spk_0 The feedback we're getting is that
spk_0 interest rates are going to come down.
spk_0 They're getting a little bit worried
spk_0 that tech cycle is going to start ending
spk_0 at some point sooner than later,
spk_0 or in the horizon now,
spk_0 and they're rotating to the next risk level
spk_0 in the next alpha generator.
spk_0 And that's for them is biotech.
spk_0 And they're into look at interesting names,
spk_0 like an ionist, like Argenics, like these UCBs,
spk_0 they're sort of fresh new names for people to look at now.
spk_0 To your point, Brian, so I'd argue that Eric,
spk_0 I remember when I was growing up under you, right?
spk_0 We had to be stock pickers,
spk_0 and we wanted to be an environment where we're useful.
spk_0 What we mean by that is that companies
spk_0 that had good values, X and up,
spk_0 they had the thin workout companies actually went down,
spk_0 and things actually acted rationally.
spk_0 And I would argue we're finally back to that level.
spk_0 Hard to say that we're in a bull.
spk_0 Good, I think we're just sort of a, you know,
spk_0 we're finally back to value recognition.
spk_0 And we're still underperforming.
spk_0 You know, our trackers in the beginning of the year said,
spk_0 we're gonna underperform the market
spk_0 and we should be flat for the year.
spk_0 So I think we're tracking back to that flat year over year,
spk_0 which is sort of where we think we should be for this year,
spk_0 and then hopefully next year is a better year.
spk_0 It's funny, you said that,
spk_0 you're on, I still get a lot of chiding from my friends
spk_0 who read that Wall Street Journal quote,
spk_0 that you just referenced a mind from 20 years ago.
spk_0 I said, you know, companies that had good news
spk_0 had their stocks go up and those that had bad news
spk_0 had their stocks go down.
spk_0 It was a genius piece of insight on my part.
spk_0 And I'm glad you remembered as well.
spk_0 But it still works.
spk_0 I mean, you're right.
spk_0 Go ahead, Bernie Sam.
spk_0 Yeah, just just sorry,
spk_0 I don't want to take that to a conversation with,
spk_0 but in terms of what is still yet to be worked out is,
spk_0 and I don't know whether you guys have got this sust or not,
spk_0 but I'm not quite sure we're special to drugs
spk_0 sitting in the middle of all this,
spk_0 in terms of even the new launchers having to be priced
spk_0 at whatever MFN will be,
spk_0 which is kind of decided by US pricing.
spk_0 I don't know.
spk_0 And I also wonder just a throwaway comment here.
spk_0 Now that RFK has shaken hands without Budberla,
spk_0 do we think the heat is off mRNA vaccines
spk_0 or is that too much wishful thinking?
spk_0 Those are those are great points things
spk_0 that we need to keep in mind as we look forward.
spk_0 Yeah, I mean, from where I stand,
spk_0 you're on, you must be a more popular guy than I,
spk_0 because I haven't gotten a lot of general's calls.
spk_0 We've gotten a couple of all I will say.
spk_0 And even that is a sea change in optimism,
spk_0 getting any calls I'd say from general's
spk_0 is something that we're not used to in the last six to 12 months.
spk_0 And then Brian, you made some really perceptive comments.
spk_0 I hope that we're in a glass half full environment,
spk_0 but I also worry that things are changing so quickly
spk_0 that we may start to see even aggressive post-sering
spk_0 where data sets don't only receive the benefit of the doubt,
spk_0 but they get all of the doubt,
spk_0 where by side or start believing everything
spk_0 the management teams tell them when markets,
spk_0 trees grow to the sky,
spk_0 grow to the sky in terms of market opportunities,
spk_0 where all political headlines is dismissed
spk_0 as just being just that.
spk_0 So there's a fine line, I think,
spk_0 between optimism and pessimism.
spk_0 And unfortunately, I don't know that we've handled that line
spk_0 very well historically in our sector.
spk_0 I feel like we're always on one or the other side of it,
spk_0 and we just can't help ourselves due to other factors,
spk_0 but hopefully this time it'll be a little bit different.
spk_0 Well, it's probably Eric to your comment.
spk_0 I'm, there's no way I'm more popular than you.
spk_0 I think it's purely probably a function of what we cover, perhaps.
spk_0 And so the names that are resonating
spk_0 and maybe that's kind of what's getting traction.
spk_0 And look, this is the new tranche of innovators, right?
spk_0 That are, frankly, at this point,
spk_0 and not even new.
spk_0 So we're talking about like the organics, the UCBs,
spk_0 IONIS is the sort of the new kid on the block now
spk_0 that's resonating with people.
spk_0 Yeah, terrific Smith Cap, innovative growth stories
spk_0 that are just turning that, that cusp
spk_0 into profitability as well, which literally will,
spk_0 I think help the XBI going forward.
spk_0 But let's some, let's turn our attention
spk_0 to maybe some of the other headlines from the week.
spk_0 And there was a little bit of chatter
spk_0 and controversy coming out of the FDA.
spk_0 Brian, you want to start us off on that?
spk_0 Oh, yeah, this is kind of a fun story to kind of follow.
spk_0 So earlier this week, Dr. George Tidmarsh,
spk_0 who was recently appointed head of the FDA Cedar,
spk_0 this is the center for drug evaluation and research.
spk_0 This is the center that really reviews
spk_0 most of the drugs that got approved by the FDA.
spk_0 He put a posting on LinkedIn, indicating that Cedar
spk_0 will be looking at surrogate endpoints,
spk_0 used for FDA approval, and criticizing some of the failures
spk_0 to confirm that have excited the axon skipping drugs.
spk_0 So there's like Sireptus Exxon is 51.
spk_0 And I think we all know at this point,
spk_0 this has been one of the biggest sources
spk_0 of criticism for accelerated approval,
spk_0 bestriding particular, but the other axon skippers as well.
spk_0 But he also interestingly took specific aim
spk_0 at a drug called Luke Kindness or Vocalis Sporin
spk_0 for the treatment of Lupus Nefritus,
spk_0 saying that it has significant toxicity
spk_0 and it has not been shown to provide a clinical,
spk_0 a direct clinical benefit for patients.
spk_0 So this kind of odd because
spk_0 Lufa Kindness actually has full approval
spk_0 based on a 52 week randomized placebo controlled study.
spk_0 And I guess one could reach for an argument
spk_0 that a complete renal response
spk_0 is not a direct clinical benefit,
spk_0 but a measure of UPCR and DGFR improvements together.
spk_0 So in the world of, but in the world of approved drugs,
spk_0 that really having confirmed a clinical benefit,
spk_0 I would say this is very, very far from an egregious case study
spk_0 for a very senior FDA official to be citing.
spk_0 At least from the information that's publicly available.
spk_0 Now Adam Fierstein at Stat Road Disapparuss
spk_0 definitely coming around through the biotech-thosoph channels
spk_0 this week because Tidmarsh was actually once the CEO
spk_0 of a company called LaHoya Pharmaceuticals,
spk_0 but resigned in 2019 when Kevin Tang
spk_0 from Tang Capital, who's the largest shareholder
spk_0 in chairman of LaHoya at the time,
spk_0 was quoted in the PR announcing Tidmarsh's departure.
spk_0 Notably, the largest shareholder of Eurenia,
spk_0 at least as the last filing is Tang Capital as well.
spk_0 So once this all started to kind of blow up,
spk_0 Tidmarsh went up to leading the post saying
spk_0 that it did not reflect the views of the FDA or HHS.
spk_0 Eurenia also issued a press release title
spk_0 of Eurenia response to now retracted LinkedIn post
spk_0 and that PR just reiterated that had received
spk_0 full approval from the FDA.
spk_0 So those are kind of the facts there.
spk_0 And in the background, everyone's sort of like
spk_0 scratching their head, what was the relationship
spk_0 back in the day between George Tidmarsh and Kevin Tang
spk_0 back at LaHoya?
spk_0 Are there any implications to such an odd citation
spk_0 from his LinkedIn profile as a critique
spk_0 of accelerated approval here?
spk_0 And obviously, this is kind of implications for
spk_0 sort of the scientific rigor at the FDA.
spk_0 And I know we all have different opinions
spk_0 of the level of chaos that this current FDA currently has,
spk_0 but we'd love to hear any thoughts from you guys on that.
spk_0 Yeah, we can go on the chaos in just a moment.
spk_0 Eurone, did you want also note the IO biotech news?
spk_0 Yeah, so IO bio, you know, also this is a cancer vaccine
spk_0 that's fairly unique.
spk_0 They had amazing phase one slash two data.
spk_0 They're targeting Iodone PD1, PDL1.
spk_0 And it's not a controlled study
spk_0 out of one center in Europe, but really,
spk_0 sort of like just sucks out of data.
spk_0 And they did a phase three that just read out,
spk_0 a lot of the KWL feedback is that the study
spk_0 was a little underpowered and it looks like that was probably
spk_0 right.
spk_0 I mean, they just missed.
spk_0 It was .06 on PFS.
spk_0 Survival obviously was underpowered,
spk_0 but trending in the right direction.
spk_0 So interesting, you know, tidbits in the data
spk_0 is too in which population it works.
spk_0 This is frontline melanoma, by the way.
spk_0 And so they went to FDA,
spk_0 I mean, very, very safe, by the way,
spk_0 on top of on top of Kichurdo and showed better data
spk_0 and you would have expected on Kichurdo alone.
spk_0 And obviously it's a controlled study.
spk_0 In any event, remember, this was an important case study
spk_0 just given some of what Seiber has said in the past.
spk_0 Admittedly, there were more skeptical about PFSs
spk_0 and end point and vaccines, but admittedly was more
spk_0 on the MRNA vaccine.
spk_0 And there was a question whether they'll be able to file
spk_0 because they literally just missed
spk_0 and whether they'll be flexibility.
spk_0 And the answer was from FDA was no,
spk_0 you need to run another study.
spk_0 So we're, you know, the next test cases potentially
spk_0 going to be, and we're going to talk about this shortly.
spk_0 At Esmo, we're going to see data from Zanza in CRC
spk_0 face to be data from ex-Alexis.
spk_0 And that's going to drive questions about
spk_0 what to expect from studies were in most of the patients
spk_0 who come in from XUS.
spk_0 But FDA is continuing.
spk_0 We're all trying to figure out what is this new flexibility
spk_0 going to do from FDA.
spk_0 And it's not necessarily going to be that easy to call.
spk_0 It's kind of what we're seeing on our side.
spk_0 It's kind of been, there's flexibility,
spk_0 but it's not always what you expect.
spk_0 You're on real quick.
spk_0 I just want to echo what you said and say that
spk_0 my personal take for what it's worth, which is nothing,
spk_0 is that I think the FDA made the wrong call here.
spk_0 I've visited this company in Denmark
spk_0 and also interviewed her shortly after the data
spk_0 came out.
spk_0 And the person running this company,
spk_0 my my Britzzoka, is a very serious researcher.
spk_0 So this is definitely not a case of like, you know,
spk_0 a high PCO who's like whipping up, you know,
spk_0 investor, fervor to get something approved
spk_0 that should not get approved.
spk_0 I mean, this barely missed, as you said.
spk_0 And I think this is an example of like P value worship
spk_0 that's not in the best interest of science or patience.
spk_0 And I understand why the FDA might not want to make precedence
spk_0 or, you know, really vary widely on how different things,
spk_0 you know, are treated maybe in different ways.
spk_0 But to me, this would have been a classic example of,
spk_0 if you really look at this and say,
spk_0 is there a signal going on here?
spk_0 You know, maybe this deserves an accelerated approval
spk_0 while we take the years that it takes
spk_0 to run another study to see if it could confirm or not.
spk_0 To me, it's a great example of what would have been
spk_0 the utility of something like that.
spk_0 So obviously that was a close call of, you know,
spk_0 a tough decision of the FDA to make.
spk_0 Brian mentioned the chaotic LinkedIn release
spk_0 from from George Tiedemann.
spk_0 Marsh, it's good to know that I'm not the only one here
spk_0 who doesn't know how to use social media.
spk_0 There was also a case of a drug being rejected
spk_0 a Fortress biodegrad for MEG-Kase disease
spk_0 based on another CMC issue.
spk_0 They received a CRL.
spk_0 So by my count, we've had ultra-genic spyagens,
spk_0 Colorado and now Fortress all getting relatively recent
spk_0 CRLs and orphaned pediatric indications
spk_0 that, you know, these are all drugs
spk_0 that probably should have been approved.
spk_0 So the bigger question is, how are we feeling about the FDA?
spk_0 How would you guys rate this leadership team
spk_0 and its ability to execute?
spk_0 Well, can we just double click the meat?
spk_0 We've talked about this in the past and ultra-genics.
spk_0 And ultra-genics, this is UX111 gene therapy for MPS3,
spk_0 San Felipe syndrome.
spk_0 And remember, this was going to be the first test case
spk_0 under C-Burs, which was really Peter Marx
spk_0 as accelerated approval pathway.
spk_0 They got a CRL because of a few sort of
spk_0 idiosacratic manufacturing related
spk_0 number of temperature probes they needed to do and shipping.
spk_0 The FDA actually came out and said,
spk_0 so this is what we mean by interesting
spk_0 the way they ended up handling it.
spk_0 They said on the clinical side, the data looks really good
spk_0 and it's acceptable, not for accelerated approval,
spk_0 but for full approval based on the data,
spk_0 which was single arm, not controlled against historical
spk_0 control and based on the benefit from baseline.
spk_0 So they skirted the whole question of an accelerated
spk_0 approval, but they showed flexibility and potentially
spk_0 proven them done the line in efficacy,
spk_0 but they got to work out through the manufacturing issue.
spk_0 So kind of very co-evocal sort of how to read that.
spk_0 Yeah, I guess my point you're wrong was we got three,
spk_0 sorry, four CRLs all due to CMC.
spk_0 So again, biogen, ultra-genics is you referenced
spk_0 in detail, scholar rock and now four chris.
spk_0 It seems like a lot.
spk_0 I mean, it just seems like we're not getting through
spk_0 the workflow that we need to have happen on a CMC standpoint,
spk_0 which really shouldn't be that hard for some of these
spk_0 indication biogen, stroke, spend rosas already approved
spk_0 for God's sakes.
spk_0 So I was just referencing maybe some execution
spk_0 the steps there, but again, the bigger question is how
spk_0 you guys feel about leadership.
spk_0 Good point, good point on that.
spk_0 Yeah, especially on Spinaraza, good point.
spk_0 No one wants to pick up that potato.
spk_0 Go ahead, Brian.
spk_0 I'm not great.
spk_0 Look, I mean, I think, you know, I've been saying this
spk_0 all year and I think this is sort of like a top-down issue,
spk_0 is there just seems to be chaos and inconsistency, right?
spk_0 I think the problem is there seems to be a huge gap
spk_0 between, you know, in sort of like inused
spk_0 syncratic decisions on safety and efficacy on applications,
spk_0 where sometimes there's this enormous level of flexibility
spk_0 and other times there just seems to be no flexibility at all
spk_0 and it just doesn't seem consistent.
spk_0 And look, I mean, I think, you know, it's complicated
spk_0 probably by, you know, the different views in HHS, right?
spk_0 And I know we've talked about Vanille before,
spk_0 but like, like, Vanille seems like such an odd duck
spk_0 to have in this administration, where he, you know,
spk_0 classically is, you know, I think perceived by most people
spk_0 as an over-regulator, someone who would be, you know,
spk_0 all in on having a very powerful FDA
spk_0 to really demand high level safety and efficacy studies,
spk_0 but at the same time, you know, Marty McCarty goes out there
spk_0 and just talks about like, you know, looking at just
spk_0 pre-clinical data and maybe approving things just based
spk_0 on AI.
spk_0 So there is this disparity and it's very hard, I think,
spk_0 to, from an industry perspective, to kind of hone in and say,
spk_0 oh, this is sort of the level of out of evidence
spk_0 that one needs for an approval.
spk_0 And I think because, because of that inconsistency,
spk_0 it becomes quite art, right?
spk_0 And I think more and more, and this is not just a criticism
spk_0 of the administration, but the prior administration,
spk_0 the administration before that, there's more and more
spk_0 of a demand to try to characterize who is the person
spk_0 who has ultimate power to sign an action letter
spk_0 and will, you know, what's their opinion relative
spk_0 to the review division and what's their boss's opinion
spk_0 relative to their opinion because these things have mattered
spk_0 more and more where one person will feel fine
spk_0 with just overturning everyone else
spk_0 below them's decision on something.
spk_0 And I think that's been a concerning trend
spk_0 that's been going on for, you know, a decade or more.
spk_0 I think you're right.
spk_0 This administration, this leadership team
spk_0 at the FDA did not start that sort of top-down inclination
spk_0 to overrule senior staff members.
spk_0 And that trend has been ongoing for a while,
spk_0 but it does seem like it's potentially accelerated
spk_0 in the last few months, if not years.
spk_0 And we're seeing more and more two-tiering of systems
spk_0 at the FDA where the top brass have an idea
spk_0 where they wanna go and what they wanna do.
spk_0 Maybe it's more politically motivated.
spk_0 Maybe it's higher level policy stuff,
spk_0 but they haven't spent the time to bring along
spk_0 the senior staffers underneath them to their views.
spk_0 So the senior staffers are continuing to conduct reviews.
spk_0 They're continuing to be very, I'd say, rigorous
spk_0 and conscientious in their workflow,
spk_0 but often it doesn't really matter.
spk_0 And that seems to be, you know,
spk_0 somewhat problematic your own.
spk_0 You reference just how hard it is to read this agency.
spk_0 I sense that that may be part of the problem.
spk_0 Okay, well, let's move on to some of the big company news
spk_0 the week.
spk_0 We had yet another meaningful merger
spk_0 and acquisition to this week.
spk_0 I think it's now five straight weeks
spk_0 of meaningful deal flow in biotechnology.
spk_0 In this case, it was one larger biotech,
spk_0 a gen-map buying a midsize biotech in Maris.
spk_0 The acquisition was valued at about $8 billion,
spk_0 about a 41% premium to where Maris had been trading.
spk_0 And the asset here, of course,
spk_0 is Maris' Peta's EMPTIMAB.
spk_0 It's a bi-specific candidate that hits EGFR
spk_0 and LGR5 directed at patients with head and neck cancer.
spk_0 The product, Peta's EMPTIMAB is in two phase three studies,
spk_0 one for first line and one for second line,
spk_0 and head and neck cancer.
spk_0 And Gen-map has talked about also doing additional trials
spk_0 in earlier stages of disease.
spk_0 The other derivative impact here is the company
spk_0 that we're involved with by CARA was up even more
spk_0 than Maris' week to date.
spk_0 By CARA is up almost 50%.
spk_0 I think Maris is up about 37%.
spk_0 What's interesting about that is that by CARA
spk_0 is Maris' chief competitor.
spk_0 So you might want to ask,
spk_0 how can the competitor that didn't get acquired
spk_0 or performed or outperform the company that did get acquired?
spk_0 I think there's a lot of sense from investors
spk_0 that there's heated strategic interest in head and neck cancer,
spk_0 a tumor type that really hasn't seen much innovation before.
spk_0 I think now there's some discussion also
spk_0 that there might be other interested parties
spk_0 and strategic transactions that by CARA can benefit from.
spk_0 And even before the Maris news,
spk_0 by CARA was getting the short end of the stick
spk_0 from investors it had about 1-8th,
spk_0 the valuation of Maris.
spk_0 So maybe not surprising to see that disparity
spk_0 and valuation close at least a little bit.
spk_0 But I don't know, Sam or your owner,
spk_0 do you guys want to add into this discussion?
spk_0 Yeah, sure.
spk_0 Look, it's one of the I think questions
spk_0 that you immediately asked me to say
spk_0 is why did many of the larger
spk_0 far more companies do this?
spk_0 And of course, it doesn't matter from the cell side,
spk_0 the dollars that GenMaps paying,
spk_0 I'm sure as just as valuable as the dollars
spk_0 that a large pharma company would have paid.
spk_0 The interesting thing, of course, here is that I'm sure
spk_0 you've got your view of by CARA and by CARA's data.
spk_0 We do view the Maris data as more broadly
spk_0 applicable in the patient population,
spk_0 having a look at the HPV1 negative HPV1,
spk_0 positive patients, et cetera.
spk_0 But the question therefore ends up being,
spk_0 what happens if somebody with deeper pockets
spk_0 or broad shoulders does come out and take up by CARA?
spk_0 What does that mean for GenMap in terms of marketing
spk_0 this product in the longer term?
spk_0 So those are questions that are that you know,
spk_0 I'd be interested to see what you guys think.
spk_0 The data, we could debate the data, right?
spk_0 At the end of the day, they're not directly comparable,
spk_0 different follow-up periods, et cetera.
spk_0 So it's harder to make it a hard judgment on this.
spk_0 And of course, GenMap could have gone and taken out by CARA,
spk_0 but I think the calculation they made
spk_0 is that they need something that's going to be on the market
spk_0 by 2027.
spk_0 And I'm not sure that that is the case for by CARA.
spk_0 So that's the read I've got.
spk_0 And of course, the sense that we got from our valuations
spk_0 in those sort of companies, I've said,
spk_0 is that the colorackable opportunity here
spk_0 is kind of not really in the calculations.
spk_0 And that's an upside as is probably
spk_0 some of the earlier uses of the drug.
spk_0 So I'd love to hear what you're own
spk_0 and you guys think on that comparative efficacy
spk_0 and the risk to GenMap now that it's going to be a competitor
spk_0 to whoever takes by CARA out,
spk_0 if somebody takes by CARA out.
spk_0 Yes, we go ahead, Eric.
spk_0 Nope, not all year, you're wrong.
spk_0 Well, we cover GenMap.
spk_0 So GenMap, we give them a lot of credit.
spk_0 There's a smart team.
spk_0 The challenge in biotech is you and it's like the incredible.
spk_0 Right?
spk_0 Remember when I forget the sun runs and he's like first
spk_0 and then the dad yells at him to be second.
spk_0 In biotech, when you're so successful,
spk_0 in this case, it stars Alex, you know,
spk_0 eventually that party will end.
spk_0 And it's very hard to offset that royalty stream.
spk_0 And so they're really trying and getting aggressive.
spk_0 The deal is definitely not cheap.
spk_0 And our colleague Tara was extremely bullish here on Miris
spk_0 and she had a great call.
spk_0 And the GenMap side, they're taking on a tremendous amount
spk_0 of debt just between the interest expense
spk_0 they're accruing and the loss of interest income from cash
spk_0 is about 430 million recalculate annually.
spk_0 So it's fairly, it's fairly dilutive
spk_0 because you're taking up X on top of it.
spk_0 So it's going to be meaningfully diluted for two years.
spk_0 And then the data looks really, really strong.
spk_0 And as you said, Eric, there's a question of why is
spk_0 biocara undervalued?
spk_0 And because the data doesn't look necessarily that different.
spk_0 Where I think we're something we're both bullish
spk_0 in this area.
spk_0 On the GenMap side, it's a huge bet
spk_0 because at this point, they are fully levered
spk_0 and there's no room to do anything else.
spk_0 And it just kind of tells you that for good assets,
spk_0 you still have to absolutely pay top dollar.
spk_0 This plus the other things that they've done
spk_0 really starts moving them away
spk_0 from that Darza Lex cliff, especially if a Kinley works.
spk_0 But they took a lot of risk, which we'll see
spk_0 if your planning depends on.
spk_0 Very quickly, I'll just add and say,
spk_0 I think this, I give them credit for being aggressive,
spk_0 but I do think it's riskier than is being talked about
spk_0 because nobody knows definitively
spk_0 what the response rate of Pembro is in this setting.
spk_0 We've never seen real randomized data.
spk_0 And until we see a randomized phase three study
spk_0 with this asset or other assets,
spk_0 this is a classic example of where IO has really surprised people
spk_0 once you actually do randomized trials.
spk_0 So I think that's a risk.
spk_0 And then commercially, maybe why did a big firm
spk_0 a company not step in here?
spk_0 This is a classic case where in today's day and age,
spk_0 there's literally 100 Chinese companies
spk_0 that will sell you one of these for pennies.
spk_0 If you are a little more patient and have the scale
spk_0 and all of that to be, to not worry
spk_0 about not being first to market and all of that.
spk_0 And eventually making it further on down the line.
spk_0 So I think it's risky for those two reasons as well.
spk_0 Good points, Brad.
spk_0 What about the broader theme here, guys?
spk_0 We have seen substantial M&A each week this fall
spk_0 for now four or five weeks running.
spk_0 Is there something underfoot here, a real trend?
spk_0 Or is this just kind of dumb luck
spk_0 and random clustering of news releases?
spk_0 Brian, you have a thought on that?
spk_0 I mean, I have a tendency to think it's a little random,
spk_0 but I think people will really push back on me on that
spk_0 and say, you know, it's farm is sort of waking up
spk_0 to the valuations starting to move
spk_0 and trying to take the opportunity to get in
spk_0 before they move too much.
spk_0 But I've always found it kind of hard to find more than just
spk_0 and a little bit of an idiot saying
spk_0 Cratic Nature to win M&A's.
spk_0 A car outside of one, it's like a particularly big area
spk_0 that farmer has a cute demand for, like I remember,
spk_0 Hepsie, there were just a lot of M&A's going on there.
spk_0 You know, maybe in the GLP1 space,
spk_0 you see a little bit of it now,
spk_0 but outside of that, I guess I'm calling me one
spk_0 of the more skeptical people that this is like
spk_0 a open door of M&A that's starting to occur.
spk_0 Eric, just, that's not forget though.
spk_0 I mean, I'm not going to disagree with Brian
spk_0 because I'm not sure if there's a crystal ball
spk_0 that anyone has.
spk_0 I mean, every year that we started, I think, Tim
spk_0 or any banker would tell you,
spk_0 I have a great book of M&A coming up.
spk_0 And of course, this is like the third year
spk_0 that the first half was slow and then,
spk_0 and then it the first quarter and then it really picked up.
spk_0 So, but you do have people looking into the horizon
spk_0 at lower rates, right?
spk_0 So the opportunity for refinancing down the road
spk_0 can be meaningful at a lower rate.
spk_0 And of course, nobody knows what that rate would be.
spk_0 And at the same time, as a general,
spk_0 you can't just keep waiting until rates actually hit
spk_0 like 2% or whatever it is they're heading to
spk_0 because they have this cliff and they had to do something, right?
spk_0 Was this the right asset or not?
spk_0 Brats, point is good, although I,
spk_0 I'm going to try and get that answer for you, Brad.
spk_0 Are people paying just pennies for assets out of China?
spk_0 I doubt it.
spk_0 I've got the numbers.
spk_0 One, they'll add them up and send them to you.
spk_0 I don't know, right?
spk_0 The point is that isn't a risk,
spk_0 but at the end of the day,
spk_0 this is one, the cost of capital should be getting lower.
spk_0 You can't wait for the day that it happens,
spk_0 but at least you can plan forward like that.
spk_0 So there's one element there that could be driving some of this.
spk_0 And of course, more certain things coming back
spk_0 into this pricing environment, the tariff situation,
spk_0 which I think as time passed,
spk_0 people got more and more comfortable with it.
spk_0 And of course, the Albert Burla
spk_0 and the administration conversation
spk_0 kind of put a cap on that.
spk_0 So perhaps there's some of that,
spk_0 although Jen Mavam sure had made up its mind
spk_0 way before that the announcement from Pfizer
spk_0 and the administration.
spk_0 Well, it's also, you know, this is nothing new, right?
spk_0 Deals get done when I'm derisking events,
spk_0 when the buyer is comfortable and the seller
spk_0 has gotten renumerated.
spk_0 And I think it's also, we can't ignore the fact
spk_0 that the market is finally renumerating companies.
spk_0 So there are much more comfortable selling now
spk_0 that seems to be kind of our thinking here.
spk_0 Yeah, I agree with everything you said.
spk_0 I do, I do think there is some stochastic nature
spk_0 to deal flow and, you know, nobody really can time their release
spk_0 or their transaction to anything else.
spk_0 And they're saying, Sam, you're right.
spk_0 The macro has changed dramatically
spk_0 and with MFN and tariffs and some of the other issues
spk_0 behind it, we finally are coming out of a nuclear winter,
spk_0 not just for biotech stocks,
spk_0 but also for pharma transactions.
spk_0 So I would hope that we would see some more of these.
spk_0 Let's continue to move on to some of the clinical data sets
spk_0 from the week.
spk_0 And I guess the big disappointment this week
spk_0 was the Moon Lake, the Reputix News.
spk_0 Not sure if others cover this company.
spk_0 I don't, but we do pay some attention
spk_0 to the Hydrogen-Ida Supertiva space, the H.S. space,
spk_0 and Moon Lake and their drug were thought
spk_0 to have potentially a best-in-class opportunity here
spk_0 with an IL-17 alpha.
spk_0 Unfortunately, I said a local map,
spk_0 not just failed to differentiate itself
spk_0 versus the incumbent UCBs, Benzellx,
spk_0 but also failed to achieve statistical significance
spk_0 on one of two phase three studies.
spk_0 So that really puts the drugs approval in jeopardy
spk_0 in a way that I don't think anyone would have predicted.
spk_0 I think there were a lot of folks trying to game
spk_0 how differentiated a local map might have been
spk_0 versus Benzellx into this data set,
spk_0 but no one expected this disastrous result
spk_0 to stock it down over 85% this week.
spk_0 And I think looking forward, it's really unclear
spk_0 how this company gets out of,
spk_0 it gets moving forward.
spk_0 So this was a pretty major binary for the industry.
spk_0 I think a lot of us woke up on Monday morning,
spk_0 not sure how the XBI was gonna perform around it
spk_0 because there was so much cap and interest on this event.
spk_0 And yet we shrugged it off and moved on.
spk_0 And again, maybe saw a bigger picture
spk_0 that was more favorable in terms of other companies
spk_0 doing other things, evaluations that are reasonable.
spk_0 But Brian, why don't you introduce the LARAMR news?
spk_0 I know that was also an interesting situation.
spk_0 Yeah, yeah, another interesting situation
spk_0 regarded as negative on the day of,
spk_0 but has been climbing back pretty strong.
spk_0 So some management's been doing a good job
spk_0 with investors getting them over the line here.
spk_0 So the LARAMR's developing drug for freejacks ataxia.
spk_0 And their update was on their clinical study,
spk_0 which is potentially a study
spk_0 that is approval under subpart H.
spk_0 I think that's the thesis here.
spk_0 And this drug, it's a recombinant for taxon,
spk_0 which is the protein that's deficient in FI.
spk_0 So the endpoint of this study is actually
spk_0 for taxing levels and skin.
spk_0 And then they've already shown good levels
spk_0 in earlier data cuts.
spk_0 And this week they showed in 10 out of 10 patients
spk_0 with six months of for taxon treatment,
spk_0 more than 50% of normal for taxon levels in skin measurements.
spk_0 They also showed a median improvement from baseline
spk_0 in M-FARS of 2.25 points.
spk_0 And this is a primary clinical endpoint in FI studies,
spk_0 it was the basis of approval of biogen skycliarists
spk_0 following their randomized controlled study.
spk_0 But this is an open label study.
spk_0 So not in our CT, but showing similar effects
spk_0 to skycliarists from baseline.
spk_0 So this is all good, but they also announced
spk_0 that out of 39 patients toast in the study,
spk_0 seven of them are 18% experienced anaphylaxis.
spk_0 The stock closed on Friday at five in change
spk_0 and was in the low threes when it opened earlier this week.
spk_0 But as I said, management's been doing a good job
spk_0 getting investors comfortable.
spk_0 It's climbed backs in the mid-FI's or mid-FARS right now.
spk_0 I think the debate here is really is skin for taxon,
spk_0 a surrogate endpoint that's reasonably likely
spk_0 to provide a clinical benefit.
spk_0 And how much evidence is landmark generating
spk_0 to make that cause?
spk_0 So I think most people would agree that if you could get
spk_0 functional for taxon levels and the tissues of interest,
spk_0 this would be a no-brainer for subpartage approval.
spk_0 But skin for taxon rate is not a direct measurement
spk_0 of a tissue of interest.
spk_0 It's a surrogate tissue of a tissue of interest.
spk_0 And we don't have measurements of the tissues
spk_0 that would be ideally measured for this study.
spk_0 But it's a very good marker in terms of the amount
spk_0 that they're showing in skin.
spk_0 But the question becomes when you sort of introduce
spk_0 this very real risk now of anaphyl access,
spk_0 how confident can one be that the skin for taxon measurements
spk_0 and improvement in baseline, M-FARS scores
spk_0 in an open label study?
spk_0 Is that enough to kind of support the argument
spk_0 that this is reasonably likely to predict?
spk_0 So fully expect this is gonna be another big FDA
spk_0 approved ability debate as we get closer and closer
spk_0 to sort of their final cut of data
spk_0 and they're talking about submitting a BLA for subpartage
spk_0 in the second quarter of next year.
spk_0 So one to watch closely, it's another name
spk_0 that's sort of on the margins of will they,
spk_0 won't they FDA approval?
spk_0 The FAR association, the advocacy group here's very powerful.
spk_0 A lot of people think they had a very significant role
spk_0 in ensuring that the FDA approved SkyClearis itself,
spk_0 which was a subject of a lot of controversy
spk_0 on this creep back in the day before biogen bought it.
spk_0 So look forward to following that one over the next year
spk_0 or so with the FDA debate.
spk_0 Great recap, Brian.
spk_0 Did you or Sam want to cover an aunt as well?
spk_0 And there are a few.
spk_0 Sure, I'd love to cover an aunt.
spk_0 I've been following that one for a large part of my career
spk_0 since they were one of the main players
spk_0 in Hepat C.
spk_0 So they pressed release data from their
spk_0 respiratory sensual virus study in high risk patients
spk_0 on Monday.
spk_0 And this is an antiviral for our sphere.
spk_0 We've had a couple of recent vaccine approvals for our sphere,
spk_0 but this is for the treatment of our sphere.
spk_0 And pre-market, it was down, is it missed the primary endpoint,
spk_0 which was the reduction in lower respiratory tract symptoms?
spk_0 And generally, look at a phase two studies
spk_0 on when they missed primary endpoints,
spk_0 people kind of throw them out.
spk_0 And it certainly started to look that way
spk_0 as down 20% pre-market.
spk_0 And then it started rebounding
spk_0 and has been way up since about midday on Monday.
spk_0 And while we were kind of reviewing the data pre-market,
spk_0 I was telling my associates,
spk_0 I was like, oh, I kind of actually think this data
spk_0 is pretty good, am I crazy?
spk_0 And my associates were smarter than me.
spk_0 They were like, no, no, you're right.
spk_0 This is like pretty good data.
spk_0 And I think when you look at it,
spk_0 the question is like, what is an antiviral supposed to do
spk_0 for this disease?
spk_0 And it seems like it's doing all the things
spk_0 that you would want into antiviral.
spk_0 I mean, you've shown very, very clear reduction in viral load,
spk_0 good separation from placebo across the study.
spk_0 They're showing improvement in a number of metrics
spk_0 across the overall study beyond
spk_0 just sort of the four symptom lower respiratory tract symptoms.
spk_0 And most importantly, perhaps the pre-specified subgroup
spk_0 that we're looking at of more high-risk patients
spk_0 that are sort of elderly 75 plus patients
spk_0 or with comorbid COPD,
spk_0 they showed much more robust results.
spk_0 So I think RSV and look, I mean,
spk_0 an antiviral sort of had a tough run in that,
spk_0 I think they're really good at making drugs.
spk_0 They've just sort of gone after indications
spk_0 that have been really hard to define a true clinical benefit
spk_0 or remove the needle since their day is in hapsi.
spk_0 And I think respiratory viruses are all great.
spk_0 It's a hard indication to sort of chase
spk_0 because so many of these diseases resolve
spk_0 and most people so quickly, it's hard to even ever pick up
spk_0 a benefit unless you run in huge, huge studies.
spk_0 So here I think what there was successful is they found
spk_0 a high-risk population that you would truly be worried about
spk_0 with an infection, not statistically significant,
spk_0 but there was a pretty significant number of patients
spk_0 on control who wound up hospitalized
spk_0 for RSV versus on treatment.
spk_0 And that may just be random noise,
spk_0 but I think with all of the other data points,
spk_0 it's pretty supportive that they have a real antiviral here
spk_0 for this infection.
spk_0 So now the question is, is the data good enough
spk_0 to find a big former partner who'd be interested
spk_0 in developing this as sort of a product
spk_0 to put in the hospitals or older person homes
spk_0 to try to intervene in patients who are high risk
spk_0 that come down with an RSV infection?
spk_0 And I kind of think of us.
spk_0 Thanks Brian, awesome recap.
spk_0 It really wasn't that busy a week in terms of news flow.
spk_0 And I think we covered all the major data releases.
spk_0 That'll give us an opportunity to maybe do something
spk_0 we don't often get to do on biotech, which is look forward
spk_0 a little bit and see what's coming down the road
spk_0 later this month.
spk_0 We've of course got major medical conferences
spk_0 and kicking off for the fall.
spk_0 I know a bunch of us are gonna be going over to Berlin
spk_0 to see what's happening at ESMO.
spk_0 So we'll talk about that.
spk_0 And right around the corner for better for worse
spk_0 is earning season as well.
spk_0 So I thought maybe we could all chime in on what types
spk_0 of prints we're looking for and maybe who's most at risk
spk_0 for seeing performance around their Q3 earnings results.
spk_0 But let's start with the Q4 conference season.
spk_0 Sam, I know you're going to Berlin.
spk_0 Your owner, are you going as well?
spk_0 I'm not gonna miss going to Berlin.
spk_0 All right.
spk_0 Maybe we should do a version of biotech hang out
spk_0 from Berlin on the ground a few weeks.
spk_0 Just a three of us.
spk_0 Yeah, I love it.
spk_0 I love it.
spk_0 But what are you guys looking for?
spk_0 What are you most excited about seeing?
spk_0 You're on Goat.
spk_0 Well, for us, it's three things to boil it down to.
spk_0 And I think they're actually all laybreakers,
spk_0 interesting, they know.
spk_0 So Amjans going to have, remember,
spk_0 they bought a company called Five Prime
spk_0 to get your FGF R2 B antibody for gastric cancer
spk_0 based on that promising phase two.
spk_0 So we're going to see the first phase three.
spk_0 It's called the 42-101.
spk_0 It's the phase three results.
spk_0 These are patients that are overexpressing that five
spk_0 of a gen growth factor receptor in gastric
spk_0 or gastric suffigial.
spk_0 This is the combination.
spk_0 This is the doublet.
spk_0 And remember, Amjans said they hit the intramanelosis
spk_0 and survival.
spk_0 They continue to follow patients
spk_0 and he looks like the latest cut unsurvival
spk_0 doesn't look as good as the first cut.
spk_0 And then there is a second study which is the triplet.
spk_0 So it's a chemo, BIMA, with IO,
spk_0 face, both of them face,
spk_0 I'd probably be next to you.
spk_0 So that'd be the first one.
spk_0 This one, that's a progastory because it's the FGF R2.
spk_0 The next is the exal,
spk_0 so they did the phab, the cub was it.
spk_0 It's called Zen, Whitney,
spk_0 I'm succumbent with the Zen against the graphin in colon.
spk_0 Sir, this one is controversial and important
spk_0 because they did hit survival
spk_0 in all patients in refractory colon.
spk_0 So that's really good.
spk_0 But we don't know what drove the benefit
spk_0 whether across all patients.
spk_0 They also had a specific subsets of patients
spk_0 with liver mitts who don't do as well.
spk_0 And of course, the one thing to keep in mind is,
spk_0 and this is important for FDA these days,
spk_0 Moe, Janssen, the study,
spk_0 were enrolled outside the US.
spk_0 And it's also a question whether,
spk_0 okay, great, so you beat regoraphinib,
spk_0 which is, you know, no longer the standard of care.
spk_0 It was approved 12 years ago.
spk_0 It's sort of like the weakest kid in the block.
spk_0 But how do you do relative, you know,
spk_0 across studies to the standard of care,
spk_0 which is two other drugs that do a lot better?
spk_0 So that's going to be really important
spk_0 then to figure out with the new FDA,
spk_0 just having a survival benefit against an old standard
spk_0 is that even relevant when it's conducted XUS.
spk_0 And then finally, and Eric, this is your turf.
spk_0 We follow by antique, you obviously follow some it,
spk_0 but they have the data with Ivanesa map,
spk_0 that's their PD1, a Vegev by specific with chemo,
spk_0 head to head against Tevinbra,
spk_0 with B1, you know, Beijing plus chemo.
spk_0 So remember, this is Harmony 6,
spk_0 they beat it in China,
spk_0 this is squamous, non-self, small cell,
spk_0 they beat it on PFS, and now we'll see the data.
spk_0 And again, the question is, okay, great.
spk_0 So are you actually going to show survival benefit or not?
spk_0 But I'm not sure the data's mature enough
spk_0 and hopefully we'll be able to at least look at trends.
spk_0 So all three laybreakers are all important.
spk_0 Go ahead Sam, what do you,
spk_0 what do you put on your radar?
spk_0 Yes, so I'll pick up from where your own left,
spk_0 both of those two other studies are quite interesting for us too,
spk_0 but here on Harmony 6,
spk_0 I think what's going to be interesting is the comparator arm
spk_0 is of course the system is a map with,
spk_0 you know, you know, PactiTax or NAPA,
spk_0 so like I would plant it.
spk_0 There we have data in China,
spk_0 when you look at it comparative to the keynote 407 data
spk_0 that of course is Ketruda,
spk_0 it did look better there.
spk_0 So medium PFS seemed a little at the same follow up period,
spk_0 right, early seven and a half or so months.
spk_0 So the interesting thing would be how the control arm
spk_0 performs in this trial,
spk_0 one that we need to look at,
spk_0 which is that was the rationale 307 file,
spk_0 but and PFS as,
spk_0 as you're on rightly said is quite interesting.
spk_0 And this is remember this is where the cell cars in Oma,
spk_0 so a non-small cell cars,
spk_0 and this is a group of patients that normally would avoid
spk_0 a Vegeph inhibitor,
spk_0 and they know all the studies that we've seen in the subcuts
spk_0 from even the three S-Pyro, Pfizer drug,
spk_0 and the variety of other ones that I've tried to dig up,
spk_0 we don't see the usual problem of hemoptosis,
spk_0 which is bleeding in those patients,
spk_0 which would be the result of Vegeph.
spk_0 Remember that at the WCLC,
spk_0 the discussant of the harmony data said that all he sees here
spk_0 is Vegeph activity.
spk_0 So that kind of continues to argue against that comment,
spk_0 if you think back that this is just Vegeph,
spk_0 which of course I think most people thought that wasn't fair.
spk_0 So that's going to be interesting to look at, of course,
spk_0 OS as you're all said.
spk_0 The one other thing that we're looking at is this,
spk_0 there is a trial from Remgen,
spk_0 which is gastric cancer,
spk_0 I guess what the target is, PD1 Vegeph.
spk_0 It is an interesting combination,
spk_0 it's in gastric cancer,
spk_0 combination of their,
spk_0 so it's going to be,
spk_0 of course safety will be the biggest question here,
spk_0 clodinating point 2 ADC,
spk_0 plus the PD1 Vegeph,
spk_0 so RC148,
spk_0 and or a PD1 inhibitor,
spk_0 and this in this case is Jun-Shi's PD1,
spk_0 look, Torzi.
spk_0 So look, it's a trial that's not necessarily enormous,
spk_0 but we're very interested to see how this looks.
spk_0 What are the, is this another Vegeph that's going to show up?
spk_0 And no one really has talked about this particular one.
spk_0 So that's one we're looking at,
spk_0 just as something that is off the beaten track.
spk_0 And of course, you still have all the Astra,
spk_0 they're in presidential session one, symposium one,
spk_0 and they have the first two.
spk_0 So that's the two Destiny Breast,
spk_0 Destiny Breast 11,
spk_0 and 05 where we're looking for
spk_0 significant efficacy data from there,
spk_0 and I'm pretty sure that it's going to be very good
spk_0 in terms of the readout
spk_0 because they've already said that being statistically
spk_0 and clinically meaningful data sets.
spk_0 So we'll wait and see how this all pans out.
spk_0 So we could keep going on,
spk_0 but I think this enough for the conversation today.
spk_0 No, thanks.
spk_0 You guys covered the Summit Ivan Eskamaab,
spk_0 or actually the Kesso Ivan Eskamaab Harmony 6 trial.
spk_0 Well, I think it's going to probably be a little bit early
spk_0 to see overall survival,
spk_0 but like the two of you,
spk_0 I'm very keen to see what the hazard ratio is on PFS.
spk_0 We've got a couple of other Smithcat names
spk_0 that are going to be at the conference as well.
spk_0 Idea has a drug called Daropa Certitive,
spk_0 which is in Ocula Melanoma
spk_0 with a new adjuvant update of around nine years old patients.
spk_0 I think that's also an oral presentation.
spk_0 So I just highlight that is something that's continued
spk_0 to look very, very interesting in Ocula Melanoma,
spk_0 a tough tumor type with very few,
spk_0 very, very few alternative options.
spk_0 I just want to say that Eric,
spk_0 that was also on my list, but I thought I had enough.
spk_0 That's going to be a good product in my opinion.
spk_0 And then we're also looking at Verastem
spk_0 and the G12D space.
spk_0 Their partner and other Chinese player,
spk_0 Genfleet, will be presenting now a pretty good cohort
spk_0 of data in pancreatic cancer.
spk_0 This of course is looking to try and get a share of a market
spk_0 that's seemingly dominated by revolution medicines,
spk_0 but the efficacy data from there,
spk_0 G12D on off inhibitor has looked really good.
spk_0 They've had some tolerability considerations
spk_0 that they need to work around.
spk_0 And again, I just highlight that in pancreatic cancer
spk_0 and other tumor type that's in dire need
spk_0 of innovation is being quite interesting.
spk_0 We've just got a few minutes here.
spk_0 What's on your bingo cards for Q3 earnings?
spk_0 Any companies in particular that have a lot to gain
spk_0 or lose as we start to turn the clock forward?
spk_0 Your own, you cover a lot of the big guys.
spk_0 Well, so our genetics we think is probably going to be okay
spk_0 and in line after a huge Q2.
spk_0 So we think that should be okay.
spk_0 Legend, which is published a note today.
spk_0 So we're called, they're making core victim
spk_0 with Johnson and Johnson.
spk_0 It's a BCMH for my Loma, they're the market leader right now.
spk_0 And there have been capacity constraint
spk_0 and they've been growing capacity
spk_0 between their current sites in Jersey and in Belgium.
spk_0 And that's been taking probably a little bit slower
spk_0 than expected.
spk_0 Like I just kind of thank you for any of one of us
spk_0 does a renovation of an apartment or a house or whatever.
spk_0 How long that takes?
spk_0 Think about building complicated global plants.
spk_0 So they have been bringing more capacity,
spk_0 but it looks like there's going to be
spk_0 an incremental expansion in Q3.
spk_0 And because of it, it looks like they're probably
spk_0 going to be a smidge and light.
spk_0 Still growing mid teens quarter of a quarter,
spk_0 but not the 20% Wall Street was looking for.
spk_0 It looks like the new capacity is really going to be
spk_0 kind of late in Q4.
spk_0 So the 1.9 billion consensus,
spk_0 they can probably still hit that,
spk_0 but they might need to kind of do
spk_0 to round up the numbers to get to 1.9.
spk_0 Anyway, next year is hopefully when they're finally
spk_0 not going to be capacity constraint,
spk_0 but legend we've been feeling a ton of questions on.
spk_0 I said, this is looking good.
spk_0 And I don't know about the rest yet.
spk_0 What about biotic and modern, are there vaccines?
spk_0 Did you've been tracking them?
spk_0 Well, you go ahead because I know you're tracking them.
spk_0 They're looking down 50% right?
spk_0 They're not looking good at all.
spk_0 Go ahead.
spk_0 No, they're not looking great.
spk_0 I mean, it's hard to do the week on week comparisons
spk_0 because of the different starts,
spk_0 but if you put them on the same,
spk_0 I don't think it's a 50% but they look down.
spk_0 The difference, what I find interesting
spk_0 around, I don't know if you look that is that,
spk_0 modern doesn't seem to have done much with pricing,
spk_0 but based on our data points,
spk_0 Pfizer seems to have taken a price rise this year.
spk_0 So that might mitigate some of the pressure,
spk_0 but that's one I'm looking at,
spk_0 but then I don't cover as many stocks as you do so.
spk_0 Yeah, I mean, COVID vaccines are sort of a nice
spk_0 to have these days only for certain populations, you know?
spk_0 Brian, you get the last word on Q3 earnings.
spk_0 Yeah, I mean, I would just kind of know,
spk_0 you know, I think there's some interesting launches underway
spk_0 that people will be very focused on, you know,
spk_0 Gilead, obviously, this will be sort of the first real quarter
spk_0 of launch of the Lena Capa beer prep,
spk_0 which has been, you know, really the driving force
spk_0 behind the re-reading over the last year and a half
spk_0 for Vertax, we'll get another quarter of Journal of Axels
spk_0 with the pain drug that really launched at the very beginning
spk_0 of this year.
spk_0 Neurochrane obviously gets driven a lot
spk_0 by Ingrasmus Hales, but they have their own launch this year
spk_0 of Karnacity that started out at the beginning of the year.
spk_0 So, you know, I think a lot of us will be on that one.
spk_0 Terrific, guys.
spk_0 Thank you very much.
spk_0 We are out of time.
spk_0 So that brings to a close this episode of the Biotech Hangout.
spk_0 I hope that our listeners will join us next week
spk_0 for another hopefully very educational setting.