Technology
An Anti-Authoritarian Playbook for Donors With Joe Goldman
In this episode of 'Giving Done Right,' Joe Goldman, president of the Democracy Fund, discusses the urgent need for donors to respond to the current threats against democracy in the U.S. He ...
An Anti-Authoritarian Playbook for Donors With Joe Goldman
Technology •
0:00 / 0:00
Interactive Transcript
spk_0
This is not about one ideological camp holding more power such that they can
spk_0
set taxing policy. This is about do we care about living in a pluralistic system?
spk_0
Do we care about individual rights? Do we care about human dignity?
spk_0
Welcome to Giving Done Right. I'm Grace Nicolette and I'm Phil Buchanan.
spk_0
Today our guest is Joe Goldman, president of the Democracy Fund. Democracy Fund was created by
spk_0
eBay co-founder and philanthropist Pierre Omedjard and its goal is to build an inclusive
spk_0
multi-racial democracy that's open, just, resilient, and trustworthy. Democracy Fund and its partner
spk_0
organization Democracy Fund Voice have together committed over $500 million in grants since
spk_0
2014 to support those working to strengthen our democracy.
spk_0
Just a note, we recorded this conversation on September 9th.
spk_0
Welcome to the show Joe.
spk_0
It's great to be here. Hey Joe, great to see you and let's just jump right in. I wonder if you could react to something.
spk_0
I wrote a piece in mid-August that, you know, maybe it's outdated by now, but I made the case that every
spk_0
foundation and donor should be alarmed by a set of actions, the dismantling of international aid,
spk_0
dismantling of health-related research, gutting of our key aspects of our domestic social safety net,
spk_0
federal funding cuts of duly allocated funds to nonprofits, doing crucial work, the detention and
spk_0
imprisonment of people legally in this country, merely for their statements and perceive political
spk_0
views. And maybe I'd add to that also just the ice raids that are indiscriminately picking folks up
spk_0
just based on some suspicion or flat out racial profiling, censorship, retaliatory investigations that
spk_0
seek to put political opponents behind bars, off-cycle redistricting in Texas at the behest of the
spk_0
president who's trying to, who's quite transparently trying to maintain control of the house and
spk_0
assault on objective data, including the dismantling of data systems and the firing of those who
spk_0
dare to report inconvenient facts and the deployment of US military forces under false pretenses
spk_0
about crime levels. I think that's probably incomplete and I guess my take is there's
spk_0
it's a genuine crisis and I want to get your response to whether I'm being hysterical,
spk_0
first and how donors should think about this moment and what they can do.
spk_0
Yeah well I don't I don't think you're being hysterical as someone who runs an organization called
spk_0
the Democracy Fund. It's um it's a bit strange to find myself living in a country that I no longer
spk_0
think is a democracy. I think donors need to understand that this is not it's not a wait and see
spk_0
and it's not a time when business is usual expectations about roles and other such things
spk_0
is going to suffice. It's not a question of whether we're on a path to authoritarianism. We are
spk_0
plainly here. The best way some experts say that the best way you know whether you're actually living
spk_0
in an autocracy or not is when you start having to think twice before saying something publicly that
spk_0
is critical of the government out of some fear for retribution and you know I think if there's
spk_0
anybody who's listening who's even modestly in the public eye who has not had to think twice
spk_0
about something that they wanted to say is either foolish or already operating in such a
spk_0
a private way that they're not actually engaging with the world around them. You know authoritarians
spk_0
have broken through and are consolidating power and if they succeed it's going to take years and
spk_0
years and years to shake off what is effectively an unfree nation which doesn't mean that we won't
spk_0
have elections. It doesn't mean that we won't still have some independent institutions but it means
spk_0
that we're going to be operating in a society that is far more closed than what we have come to
spk_0
expect in the past and operating with a fundamentally uneven playing field for anyone who opposes
spk_0
those in power. Joe I feel like whenever I've been having these conversations recently I feel like
spk_0
there is such a chasm between those who are following what's happening and actually those who
spk_0
aren't and as I'm listening to you I wonder what do you say to folks who haven't really been following
spk_0
it and I imagine some may respond and just say is this just I don't know liberal panic? What do you
spk_0
say to folks who are like no no no our institutions will hold for folks who might be more like
spk_0
see themselves as more conservative or middle of the road? Yeah well I guess I would start by saying
spk_0
to me this is not ideological this is not partisan when you talk to experts who study
spk_0
this kind of thing who study authoritarianism they see all the things that you would look for
spk_0
in democratic backsliding it is not normal for law enforcement to be out on the streets wearing
spk_0
masks and not willing to share who they are before they're pulling people into into their cars.
spk_0
It is not normal for the critics of a president to be investigated on kind of trumped up charges.
spk_0
It is not normal for a government to fire inspectors general and other kind of watch dogs that are
spk_0
there to clamp down on corruption and other such things like none of this is normal and you know I
spk_0
think folks who are unwilling to engage with that you have to be pretty intentional about it because
spk_0
it's almost everywhere you look. So when we look at the way donors have responded that is an
spk_0
possible thing to generalize about at some level right because we've seen both individual donors
spk_0
and institutional donors that have shown a lot of courage and that have spoken up in ways that
spk_0
I think have been you know inspiring and perhaps literally inspired others to do the same because
spk_0
they saw what was possible but we have also seen and I'll speak here now even our audiences
spk_0
is obviously more broadly individual donors as well as institutional donors but we have seen
spk_0
I have seen in conversations with friends with people I respect a level of fear and sort of
spk_0
to your point earlier self-censorship that I wouldn't have expected and folks saying we're going to
spk_0
wait and see we're going to try to stay under the radar we're trying to be small right now we don't
spk_0
want to be perceived as partisan what is your take when you look at the action and in action of
spk_0
different donors I guess what's your assessment and what would you hope to see more of right now.
spk_0
My starting place is I actually think that Philanthropy and the larger donor community has
spk_0
stood up in really admirable ways and has exceeded my expectations and done so far better than
spk_0
many other sectors quite frankly low bar argued well sure everything's relative yes have shown up
spk_0
better than other sectors and still not enough is that you know we did we just a survey of a
spk_0
couple hundred democracy related donors back in February and universally 99% of them were deeply
spk_0
deeply concerned about what was going on but the other thing that was shared pretty widely across
spk_0
the group was a sense and a real concern that we don't have a plan for getting out of this
spk_0
and so when you know when I look at donor behavior out there I see some donors who are backing out
spk_0
because they're afraid like that is a real thing and it's legitimately scary and I see some number
spk_0
of donors who haven't stood up because they are exhausted or overwhelmed but I think the biggest
spk_0
thing that is keeping some donors from the space is not some failure to understand what is going on
spk_0
but a sense of overwhelm by the scale of what is happening and a real struggle to see what we can
spk_0
do about it and so you know I think a lot of folks who are in the space what we've taken on as our
spk_0
responsibility is not just to stand up ourselves but to show people that well we have not figured
spk_0
everything out we don't know everything that you have to do to get ourselves out of this
spk_0
but there actually is a plan and that we actually can make progress right that for me
spk_0
is the burden that we have to bring donors along in this moment I worry less about those who are
spk_0
afraid and more about those who don't have a sense of what we can actually do
spk_0
Can you tell us what donors can actually do and I mean I think that sometimes I don't really
spk_0
understand like what does it mean to support democracy right oftentimes like does it mean that
spk_0
I'm supporting candidates probably yes but from a philanthropy or charity perspective tell us more
spk_0
about what donors can do and also what the democracy fund does it would be pretty it would be pretty
spk_0
we if I had just said that and didn't actually want to plan but um yes well look the way the way
spk_0
I think about it and a few of my colleagues and peers right we kind of break up the kinds of
spk_0
things that we need to do in this moment into three buckets three kinds of strategies and we call
spk_0
them guardrail strategies break through strategies and reconstruction strategies and let me try to
spk_0
explain that I've been toying with a metaphor and let me see if it let me see if it works for you
spk_0
so think about democracy as if we're we're in this old house on the shore and an overwhelming storm
spk_0
is coming at us and we can see that storm is going to just knock us out there are three kinds of
spk_0
things we need to do in that context when we have to really be concerned about the degree to which
spk_0
we can make it through the storm right so the first thing we need to do the kind of guardrail
spk_0
strategies we need to leverage the defenses that our house has for keeping us safe as long as we
spk_0
can we live in this house we can't just abandon it because the rest of our families inside
spk_0
and so we need to leverage the kind of levies that protect us from the storm and buy us time
spk_0
and so for us guardrails are the courts they are state and local governments they are a free press
spk_0
they're an independent civil society these are the kinds of things that are built into our democracy
spk_0
to protect us from authoritarianism and we need to do everything we can
spk_0
to leverage those guardrails and to kind of look at what's been working amongst them
spk_0
philatpia's put a remarkable amount of resource into litigation and legal organizations
spk_0
and there have been hundreds and hundreds of cases in the courts that have slowed or stopped
spk_0
authoritarian abuse of power right and that is a kind of thing that we can do the problem with
spk_0
the guardrails is that they are under remarkable pressure they're degraded some of them have already
spk_0
failed not all of them but some of them and at the end of the day guardrails don't build durable power
spk_0
to get you out of a situation they can stop things but they don't transform the situation
spk_0
and that's where these things called breakthrough strategies come in for us and you know if you
spk_0
think about the metaphor of the house you got to get people out into boats they got to get people
spk_0
away from the house and so for us guardrails strategies often involve social movements and
spk_0
organizing that engage in 3Ds right they engage in disruption they engage in deligionization
spk_0
and they secure defections from the authoritarian coalition and so if I think about kind of non-profits
spk_0
that are out there doing this kind of work I think about a group here in the DC area called
spk_0
3DC 3DC saw when Donald Trump came into office they were listening to what he was saying they saw
spk_0
the historical patterns of what authoritarian stew when they come into office and they began
spk_0
preparing because they knew at some point what the authoritarian does is they try to consolidate
spk_0
power in the capital city and so 3DC started organizing neighborhood by neighborhood over the
spk_0
course of the last 8 months to ensure that the residents of the district of Columbia would be ready
spk_0
when something like what just happened in the last few weeks would happen and what 3DC has been
spk_0
doing is delegitimizing the kinds of actions that have been taken in the name of a false emergency
spk_0
on crime that doesn't stand up to scrutiny in terms of the actual facts on the ground
spk_0
they have been training people hundreds and hundreds thousands and thousands of people
spk_0
in how to resist and how to fill the space in the community and one of the things that we've
spk_0
started seeing is as these prosecutors are bringing cases against residents in DC grand juries are
spk_0
refusing to actually indict these folks are being accused of crimes they didn't indict the sandwich
spk_0
guy for example exactly I mean what you see is residents of the district of Columbia are refusing
spk_0
to obey in advance they are using the power they have one of the powers they have is as a juror
spk_0
to say we do not accept these trumped up charges that is one of the kinds of kind of disruptive
spk_0
strategies that you can pursue the third category and again if we go back to the house metaphor
spk_0
when the storms coming when people are afraid and don't know what to do they need some understanding
spk_0
of where they can go that is an alternative to what they've got and right now what people have as
spk_0
an alternative to broken unpopular systems that have caused pain and have failed the American people
spk_0
in countless ways what they have is a mega vision that is selling them on quick easy solutions to the
spk_0
problems they're facing that probably aren't going to work and we in the pro-democracy community
spk_0
need to offer people an alternative we need to offer them a solution that is better than what
spk_0
they've had in the past and what the problem has been in the last several years for the pro-democracy
spk_0
community is we have found ourselves in the position of defending broken unpopular systems
spk_0
and people look at kind of our defense of our elections our defense of federal agencies and they
spk_0
say yeah it's not working so well for me and so if we're going to get out of this we need to leverage
spk_0
our guardrails we need to disrupt the attacks that that are coming at us and build durable power
spk_0
and we need to offer people a positive alternative of the kind of democracy the kind of society
spk_0
that will actually serve them well and there you know if I think about the kinds of things that are
spk_0
offering people that I think about press forward right this effort that has galvanized philanthropy
spk_0
around a new model of journalism to create a non-commercial sector for journalism that is part of
spk_0
that is not the whole of what we need to work towards but that's part of it there are other groups
spk_0
like more equitable democracy that are working on creating a more proportionally representative
spk_0
system and they're doing it at the state and local level to show people this is how you can actually
spk_0
govern different right and this is actually something that is going to produce a better life for
spk_0
you and your family that is what people need to see in order to get out of what we've been in right
spk_0
can you tell us specifically for a democracy fund that looks like funding in those three areas is
spk_0
that right absolutely the democracy fund and then we have a c4 called democracy fund voice and
spk_0
all of our grant making is kind of basically broken out across those three areas of work we make
spk_0
between 1560 million dollars in grants a year which is a drop in the bucket compared to what's
spk_0
really needed but doing our whatever we can to advance those different kinds of strategy
spk_0
I find this framework so helpful because I feel like I've been grasping for a framework a way to
spk_0
think about this and so so I really appreciate you're laying out those three buckets you offered a
spk_0
few examples of specific efforts can you give us a few more I mean just to bring it to life a bit for
spk_0
the donor who says yes but what what's a great nonprofit that is doing important work in one of
spk_0
those areas can you give us a few more examples Joe sure well just to stay with him this these kind
spk_0
of three buckets this framework so let me let me go back to the kind of the guard rails work so I
spk_0
talked about litigation there are a range of amazing organizations doing great litigation work
spk_0
protect democracy is the name of one um democracy forward is the name of another those are those are
spk_0
kind of very large litigation organizations that are driving most of the kinds of lawsuits that
spk_0
you see out there are being driven by those kinds of organizations I cap at Georgetown laws another
spk_0
amazing group there are other litigation efforts like the government accountability project that are
spk_0
more niche so government accountability project defense whistleblowers that is their specialty they
spk_0
don't have a big name they don't have a big profile they don't have a huge budget but in this moment
spk_0
one of the kinds of things we need to do is make sure that folks who have courage and are willing to
spk_0
step out and stand up unprinciple these whistleblowers that they actually have a defense um and so
spk_0
groups like gap get provide that defense beyond litigation within that kind of guard rails bucket
spk_0
one of the kinds of things I mentioned was like federalism is really important in this moment we
spk_0
are not we don't just have a federal government we actually have hundreds and hundreds and thousands
spk_0
of state and local governments all around the country and they have power and when the federal
spk_0
government is abusing its power one of the things we look to are governors and mayors and attorneys
spk_0
general to stand up in these moments and there's a group called guvac that supports governors who are
spk_0
pro-democracy and standing up in this moment there's another organization called states united who
spk_0
works with state-based attorneys general kind of support them standing up for democracy you know another
spk_0
really important kind of role that pro-democracy donors can play if I think about social justice kind
spk_0
of organizing building durable power breakthrough strategies you've got some kind of groups that are
spk_0
actively delegitimizing the the steps that are being taken by the administration so if you think
spk_0
about the organization community change that works with others on kind of Medicaid campaigns one of
spk_0
the things that's happened is this government has pulled the rug underneath people who depend on
spk_0
programs like Medicaid and you know folks who have been supportive of this governing coalition
spk_0
and we need groups that are going to actually help people understand how the actions of this
spk_0
government are harming them and so groups like community change that are working on things like
spk_0
Medicaid campaigns become really really important in this setting and then you know there are an array
spk_0
of groups that are trying to think from a reconstruction standpoint from a kind of this this what
spk_0
is the alternative future they're kind of digging into you know what does a project 2029 look like
spk_0
what does an agenda look like that deals with the aftermath of the amount of destruction that has
spk_0
happened within government over the course of these last many months and there you know some
spk_0
some extent you're looking at kind of think tank like organizations whether it's a new America or a
spk_0
demoser would not that are really trying to grapple with what a future government could look like
spk_0
that is not again restorationist is not going back to what we were but is actually creating something
spk_0
better and and I think we need to we need to support those kinds of spaces that are not just kind of
spk_0
intellectually imagining what these can look like but are engaging movement based organizations
spk_0
and civil society in that conversation such that if and when a window of opportunity does open up
spk_0
in which we can create something better that we actually have folks who are bought into that vision
spk_0
and and we'll be able to drive it forward.
spk_0
Make a bigger difference the Center for High Impact Philanthropy at the University of Pennsylvania
spk_0
helps you give smarter with executive education and free trusted resources learn more or apply at
spk_0
impact.u pen.edu
spk_0
Hey there I'm Kendra Adachi and my show The Lazy Genius Podcast helps you be
spk_0
a genius about the things that matter and lazy about the things that don't and you get to decide
spk_0
what matters I'm not here to tell you what to do I'm here to give you a new way to see episodes of
spk_0
The Lazy Genius Podcast are full of compassionate time management tips and permission slips to do what
spk_0
makes sense for you new episodes drop every Monday follow and listen to The Lazy Genius Podcast on
spk_0
the free Odyssey app or wherever you get your podcasts. Joe how do you talk to folks who
spk_0
worry that some of this pro-democracy kind of movement building is actually really just like a thinly
spk_0
veiled push on the left for more power so I just think back to like before the election when you
spk_0
ask you know surveys done across the spectrum people on the left and the right are saying you know
spk_0
our politics is really broken our democracy is broken I think that sometimes it's really hard
spk_0
to separate like ones kind of partisan affiliation with the desire to build up democracy how do you
spk_0
address that is it that you simply want the left to win which would be a very uncharitable interpretation
spk_0
what would you say to folks who are just worried that that's what it is look I am progressive I am
spk_0
coming from the left I you know that is that is part of who I am and I think there is a real role
spk_0
in this moment for progressives to express a robust vision for what a more equitable world looks like
spk_0
period and it is hard to look at what's happening and not understand it beyond ideological or partisan
spk_0
categories what we're seeing is the destruction of our democracy of democratic norms that have been
spk_0
in place for decades and decades this is not about one ideological camp holding more power
spk_0
such that they can set taxing policy this is about do we care about living in a pluralistic system
spk_0
do we care about individual rights do we care about human dignity honestly don't have a whole
spk_0
lot of patience at this point in the story for those who would suggest that this is just about
spk_0
helping to empower the left like it is so blatantly obvious at this point that that's not what's
spk_0
going on that we are not in normal times and I think it takes some level of willful ignorance
spk_0
to be in that position at this point I'm right there with you maybe not surprisingly but I wonder
spk_0
how to think about what to say to the folks who have spent a lot of time and grant making budget
spk_0
over the last few years focusing on things like pluralism and bridging in a moment when the
spk_0
Republican Party seems to be completely taken over by MAGA by the very forces that are threatening
spk_0
democracy so who are we bridging to exactly what does pluralism look like in this moment I mean
spk_0
you have a lot of colleagues who have focused a lot of energy on this and I've talked about polarization
spk_0
as if it is the biggest problem and I think what I hear you saying and or at least this is my
spk_0
belief is actually the problem is not polarization the problem is authoritarianism and how do we
spk_0
fight back against it I guess what's your take in are you talking to some of your colleagues about
spk_0
these questions yeah look I mean for a long time the democracy fund you may recall like was a
spk_0
bipartisan organization the guy who ran my elections and voting program had previously
spk_0
worked for Chuck Schumer and the woman who ran my program on congress had been a
spk_0
Republican chief of staff in the in the house for for two decades and it wasn't until I don't know
spk_0
2019 ish 2018 ish that we made a pivot and said like look we'll work with anyone but we are
spk_0
anchored in our values not this sense that the ultimate goal is actually some kind of bipartisan
spk_0
stance so I've been there and I actually think there is a lot of value in bridging work I think it
spk_0
is an important work to do and it needs to be done in the context of some understanding of what's
spk_0
happening and what you're trying to achieve with it you know I think in this moment we we don't
spk_0
get where we need to go without a big tent right all of the research when you look at democratic
spk_0
backsliding country after country after country part of the recipe for the anti-authoritarian playbook
spk_0
is a big tent and so we need people who are reaching out but that reaching out is not necessarily
spk_0
to those who are of a certain place within the partisan spectrum it's reaching out across sectors
spk_0
right we need to bring in folks across the education sector we need to bring in and create
spk_0
solidarity across big law we need to do so amongst the business community it's not when we think
spk_0
about the big tent it's not just about an ideologically big tent it's about a multi-sector big tent
spk_0
it's about people from all walks of life and it's about thinking about you know within the authoritarian
spk_0
coalition where are their stakeholders where their groups that actually are not well served by the
spk_0
agenda that is being carried forward and how do you pull them back into a pro-democracy big tent
spk_0
to get where we need to go and how do you hold the tension of there being a kind of progressive
spk_0
vanguard that is pushing the envelope on the kind of world we want to live in that is deeply
spk_0
important how do you hold the tension between that and the big tent like but we need both of those
spk_0
things and so you know to get back to your question like I'm not critical of those of my peers
spk_0
who are doing bridging work especially if in this moment they are using the capital the
spk_0
relationships the trust the capital that they have built up in order to actually leverage it for
spk_0
our democracy what I'm critical of is if your position as a bipartisan as a bridging institution
spk_0
as a as someone who stays out of politics if that is keeping you paralyzed and unable to act at a
spk_0
moment when literally our country our democracy is on the line like that that is unacceptable and
spk_0
that's the point where you need to ask yourselves what your true values are and what you're in this for
spk_0
the sector defense work was focused on some very specific threats some of which have actually not
spk_0
really come to pass right and worries about entire sets of nonprofits having their 501c3 status
spk_0
revoked which I'm sure you'll remember there was a period in April where everybody said that's
spk_0
coming and then it didn't come worries about an increase in the excise tax on foundations that was
spk_0
in the house bill but ultimately didn't pass but that's not that didn't just not happen that
spk_0
happened because people worked very hard to prevent it from happening but yeah no absolutely but
spk_0
I guess the question is I think my fear and maybe I'm worrying over nothing is that that is really
spk_0
important that was important work but that there are these larger even more sort of existential
spk_0
threats and that that work needs to continue but also there needs to be the sort of cross-sectoral
spk_0
alliances that you're describing is the CEO of Costco talking to John Paul Friett MacArthur and
spk_0
are they also talking to Alan Garber at Harvard because their fortunes are interconnected and linked
spk_0
so it's a lot it's a lot to do both at the same time to both focus on the narrow sector defense but
spk_0
also not lose sight of the cross-sectoral sort of possibilities and the kind of existential
spk_0
threats that might make in retrospect an increase on the excise tax on foundation earnings on
spk_0
endowments look like not such a big deal you're referring to this philanthropic coalition that's
spk_0
been created called Unite in Advance that has you know hundreds and hundreds of Philanthropies have
spk_0
signed on to a coalition to kind of defend one another and defend the philanthropic sector
spk_0
which is great which which is great and you're accurately kind of categorizing the the effort overall
spk_0
is an attempt at creating a big tent that kind of pulls in and holds some of the more center-right
spk_0
donors that may disagree on on any number of issues but can agree on fighting in excise tax
spk_0
increase that kind of thing look I guess my point of view is that there is a really important role
spk_0
for that kind of coalition and that the efforts that folks like John Paul Friett and Tony Allen and
spk_0
and others have engaged in to kind of hold together that coalition really pays off and has a lot
spk_0
of value and doesn't get you everything right and so it becomes important while that coalition is
spk_0
holding so that it can act together on as many things as it can act together some sets of that
spk_0
group need to be able to also engage and push the envelope on those things that the more conservative
spk_0
donors won't stand up for like these things both need to be true and do I think
spk_0
conversations are happening amongst business leaders and university leaders and philanthropic leaders
spk_0
it like absolutely that work is happening is it enough has it gone far enough is it happening too
spk_0
slowly also absolutely so when I in March of 2024 I had a conversation with a few of my board members
spk_0
just kind of thinking about what does the world look like in which Donald Trump is reelected and
spk_0
some of our worst concerns about a kind of authoritarian agenda actually are realized and
spk_0
based on what we know of what happens in these situations how is philanthropy going to respond
spk_0
and to a person everyone in that conversation their response is philanthropy is going to fold
spk_0
that was our assumption and that's not what has happened right we've actually
spk_0
seen hundreds and hundreds of remarkably courageous steps taken maybe not as courageous as we
spk_0
would have wanted maybe not as many stepping up in the way we would like them to but the sector has
spk_0
stood up in really important ways and not just for itself right to defend the independence and
spk_0
freedoms of civil society writ large that is what we're seeing happen and I think it's really admirable
spk_0
and Joe do you think that folks have watched what's happened with the law firms and the colleges
spk_0
and universities and perhaps drawn a lesson there about capitulation not getting you had philanthropy
spk_0
become first had philanthropy been targeted first things like united advance wouldn't have happened
spk_0
right it the philanthropy was not ready and one of the one of the benefits for this sector is that
spk_0
they came after education and big law first and I think part of why something like united
spk_0
advance was able to happen is leaders saw what was happening and said that can't be us and
spk_0
you know there have been organizations like Ian Bassons protect democracy that has been
spk_0
out there for a long time before this year started saying like the biggest thing we need to worry
spk_0
about is anticipatory obedience the kind of obeying in advance the practice of making yourself small
spk_0
and kind of operating independently we know that's how you lose right how you win is why making
spk_0
yourself big by standing up with others in solidarity within you know cross a sector and across sectors
spk_0
that's how we get where we need to go that's how you have a chance to win and I think that's what
spk_0
we're starting to see more and more of despite the very first months of this year being pretty
spk_0
dispiriting as we saw institution after institution folding I think we're now seeing
spk_0
folks stand up and recognize that that's what we can't do Joe how do you all think about
spk_0
impact right we get a lot of questions from donors they often are very concerned with
spk_0
how are they stewarding their resources to understand what the impact is and it strikes me
spk_0
in listening to you that democracy work is long it's messy it's certainly more than worth it
spk_0
how do you advise donors on how to think about their own impact when you said yourself the funds
spk_0
that you all have are a drop in the bucket I imagine for individual donors they might feel
spk_0
that even more so yeah look you know the these questions of impact are
spk_0
naughty and hard and different donors have different predispositions in terms of like what impact
spk_0
means for them and I guess you know that one of the virtues of the democracy space is there's
spk_0
lots of different kinds of work you can engage in and some of it you can see very clear hard outcomes
spk_0
if you want to engage in the world of voter registration we can calculate out for you if you put
spk_0
in x dollars you're going to get this number of voter registrants using x-wine z tactics if you
spk_0
want to kind of money ball your philanthropy there are parts of the democracy space where you can
spk_0
really very clearly see dollar per output involved and there's parts of this work that are unsexy
spk_0
and long and grinding and require patience and that can be true in the information environment
spk_0
when we're talking about narrative or trying to fight misinformation it's true in the kind of
spk_0
durable organizing work that is required to build up power to get where we need to go those kinds
spk_0
of things are much harder for those who need that kind of dollar per output point of view
spk_0
but there are donors who are attracted to that kind of work as well and I often talk to donors
spk_0
who are looking at the space and they kind of ask like what's the what's the most important thing I
spk_0
could do in my response every time is like it's like asking me in this with this three-legged stool
spk_0
which of these three legs is more important to keep the table up or the stool up right there is no
spk_0
silver bullet there's no one thing you can do that is going to mean all right the democracy safe
spk_0
and those donors who are looking for that that silver bullet are going to be frustrated and they're
spk_0
going to be they're going to waste a tremendous amount of time trying to find that one thing and I
spk_0
think what donors need to do is accept that they are one part of a March larger system
spk_0
they can't do it all and if there's something about where they're from or what their values are
spk_0
or what their strengths are that pulls them more into the world of defending free and fair elections
spk_0
instead of supporting litigation or doing work with media like great do that work do it really
spk_0
well support the groups on the ground doing that work and then let others kind of take up the other
spk_0
pieces of it and and be in communication so you're you are aware of what those other pieces are
spk_0
even if you don't need to do it all and if that feels exhausting just imagine what it feels like
spk_0
for our grantees who are out there on the front lines feeling scared at like and if if you are
spk_0
scared to do that work because you're scared of being attacked just imagine what these grantees
spk_0
on the front lines feel like in this environment it is hard leading a nonprofit in the best of
spk_0
circumstances but when you are taking the risk that you and your family and your staff are going
spk_0
to be targeted by name and swarmed on social media or targeted by regulators in the IRS or the
spk_0
Department of Justice or that is a remarkably vulnerable position to be in and we need to find
spk_0
ways as donors to use the privilege that we have in being a step removed from those threats we are
spk_0
not invulnerable from attack they can come after my 501c3 status they can target my staff or myself
spk_0
but I am far more protected than those on the front lines and we need to find some courage
spk_0
and we need to be okay with solutions that are not perfect right and not let the perfect be the
spk_0
enemy of the good here you're speaking our language how do you know that you're making a difference
spk_0
at the democracy fund like what are some other things that you think about I mean what I'm moved by
spk_0
is acts of courage like there's nothing that's going to guarantee that we're going to make our
spk_0
way out of this but what makes it all possible are people acting courageously and sorry this will
spk_0
a slightly indirect way to answer the question but um you know this weekend there was a big march in
spk_0
Washington DC on behalf of this free DC effort you know I've been going to protest and demonstrations
spk_0
since I was a teenager but as we were marching down the street there is this champ that comes up in
spk_0
most of these kinds of demonstrations that kind of show me what democracy looks like and the response
spk_0
back you know this is what democracy looks like and you know marching down the streets knowing that
spk_0
across Washington DC there are mass law enforcement agencies pulling people into you know unmarked
spk_0
cars and like that people are out there in the street taking risks being vibrant and joyful
spk_0
on behalf of democracy is like it made me tear up a little bit um and when I you know when I see
spk_0
that at the kind of community level or when I see a city clerk or an attorney general or a business
spk_0
leader taking a risk and standing up for principle because they feel like they're part of something
spk_0
greater that we've helped to create that gives me a sense that there's a path forward here and
spk_0
the cycle of anticipatory obedience has a response which is you know a kind of a cycle of
spk_0
anti-obience or whatever you want to call courage breeds more courage solidarity breeds more
spk_0
solidarity and when I see people coming together and taking action I know that we're creating the
spk_0
conditions for success in this kind of environment you know that's really powerful super powerful and I
spk_0
think I also like the way earlier you spoke to the challenge that nonprofits are facing and certain
spk_0
organizations more than others but really we see this in data we've gathered going back to February
spk_0
where we just saw overwhelming stress and worry from nonprofits when we surveyed them about funding
spk_0
cuts of course but also about things you would not expect high numbers of response to like 40%
spk_0
of leaders saying they were worried about the safety and security of their staff or the communities
spk_0
that they serve I suspect that would even be higher still now we just fielded another survey we
spk_0
don't have that data yet and we're experiencing something remarkable which is very unusual when you
spk_0
survey folks emails coming back expressions of gratitude for the opportunity to express themselves
spk_0
in a safe way about what's going on and then anecdotally I hear nonprofits say of course we need more
spk_0
funding you know we need more communication from our funders but I'm also hearing them say
spk_0
we just want to hear from them to your point about the contagiousness of courage not the word you
spk_0
used but I think that's so so important I wonder aside from thinking about folks who have it hard
spk_0
and who need to have your support in this time that sort of empathy that's driving you where else
spk_0
personally does your own commitment and courage come from Joe like why are you I mean you didn't
spk_0
expect to be in this situation obviously but you've spoken to the fact that like the fear is
spk_0
understandable and rational so can you tell us a little bit about where you draw strength
spk_0
there's a book called Hope in the Dark which is kind of a meditation on what it means to be
spk_0
hopeful written by Rebecca Solnit and part of what that book digs into is that well first of all
spk_0
that there's a difference between being hopeful and being optimistic being optimistic is just kind of
spk_0
I'm assuming that things are going to turn out okay and there's no agency in it whereas being hopeful
spk_0
is looking squarely at the hardness the scariness in front of you and making a choice that you're
spk_0
going to do all that you can to be part of the solution along with others and one of the things
spk_0
that is necessary to be hopeful is some sense of history to understand that there have been other
spk_0
people in the past who have gone through things that are just as hard if not much harder and they've
spk_0
made it through they may have not succeeded initially they may actually have failed multiple times
spk_0
but eventually we come together and we make things better it's not inevitable but we have the
spk_0
capacity to do so and so for me just being grounded being knowing that that this is not the first time
spk_0
someone has had to take on an authoritarian that we actually know a lot about what it takes
spk_0
to succeed against democratic backsliding and to know that that others have done so that for me
spk_0
is so helpful and so important at the start of the year we published a blog post that was kind of
spk_0
our commitment and our pledge for how we were going to try to as an organization walk through this
spk_0
moment I actually printed out it sits right above my desk and I look at it multiple times a day and
spk_0
you know it basically had seven or eight elements the first was choose hope
spk_0
and for us that that involved kind of finding courage to stand up for our core values and not
spk_0
retreat out of fear the second was stick together we are committed to nurturing community
spk_0
resisting isolation and forging relationships across difference even if that is hard we believe in
spk_0
practicing solidarity we want to use our position to defend and stand with those who are under attack
spk_0
we want to seek opportunity like even in the darkest of times there are opportunities to make
spk_0
things better and to actually score wins and sometimes in the darkest times that's when
spk_0
there are the greatest opportunities to do things transformationally and so we want to keep our
spk_0
eyes open looking for those opportunities we want to remain humble and acknowledge that
spk_0
our behavior and the roles we've played have contributed to the situation we're in today and so
spk_0
we want to be humble about the assumptions we hold about how we get out of here and try to learn
spk_0
from our mistakes we want to bolster resilience one of the things that we did at a retreat early
spk_0
in the years we handed out batons to our staff the message was like not only is this not a sprint
spk_0
it's not a marathon it's a relay race right because there are going to be times when all of us are
spk_0
going to have to step back because we're facing a level of exhaustion or trauma or you know you name
spk_0
it we need to feel okay with stepping back we need to make it okay for our peers our partners to
spk_0
step back and we need to be able to step in for them when they do and then finally you know our
spk_0
commitment is to live our values and at its core that means you know rejecting violence it means
spk_0
not dehumanizing our opponents and standing by the principles of an inclusive democracy so
spk_0
you know for us if I can walk through the world knowing my history feeling a sense of solidarity
spk_0
with those around me and a sense that together we can do this and living those kinds of commitments
spk_0
that makes it all possible looking at your bio as I was preparing for this conversation I feel like
spk_0
you've been involved in democracy work from the very beginning it seems like in many different
spk_0
cities and with voting and also with city planning and all of that what was the seed of your career
spk_0
that sort of sets you on this path you know it's it's it's complicated being Jewish right now for
spk_0
all the reasons we all know but I grew up learning about the Holocaust and in college you know my
spk_0
intellectual hero was a German Jewish philosopher named Hannah Arendt and the core of her project was
spk_0
kind of trying to understand how the Holocaust could happen part of her analysis is it happens
spk_0
when people are unthinking like men in Jerusalem was a book she wrote that was kind of looking at
spk_0
at a fight men and seeing that the banality of evil was made possible by people not critically
spk_0
engaging with what was going on and that the lack of public spaces where people can show up as
spk_0
citizens with a small sea enable authoritarians to kind of overpower the public realm right that we
spk_0
need places for people to be able to come together and exert power together that's what makes a
spk_0
democracy possible and holds authoritarians at bay and so yeah for me I think I was taken by this
spk_0
sense of how do we prevent the kind of mass dehumanization of others and the abridgment of people's
spk_0
rights in large part because of that story and I was attracted by this analysis that that the
spk_0
answer to those kinds of crimes against humanity the answer to hate the answer to authoritarians
spk_0
is democracy and yeah that has shaped my career I think that's a great place to end Joe this has
spk_0
been such a great conversation so appreciate all that you're doing and appreciate you sharing your
spk_0
insights and wisdom with us today it's a great conversation thanks so much thank you it's been great
spk_0
you
spk_0
there are a slew of resources about effective giving on the center for effective philanthropy's website
spk_0
cep.org as well as giving down right dot org where you'll find all our episodes and show notes
spk_0
you can also send us a note at gdrpodcast at cep.org we want to thank our sponsors who've made
spk_0
the season possible including the stubsky foundation and a note that any opinions expressed by our
spk_0
cast on the show do not necessarily reflect the views of cep or our sponsors if you like the show
spk_0
please leave us a review on apple podcast or invite a friend to listen or both giving down right
spk_0
is a production of the center for effective philanthropy it's hosted by me grace nicolet and
spk_0
philby cannon it's produced by rococo punch our original podcast artwork is by j cusca special
spk_0
thanks to our colleagues sarah martin molly hightamon Christina trann clowie heskitt neomy
spk_0
rafal and serena goosby for their marketing research writing and logistical support