Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl - Episode Artwork
Technology

Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl

In this episode of Radio Lab, we delve into the heart-wrenching case of 'Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl,' exploring the complex intersection of adoption, indigenous rights, and legal framework...

Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl
Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl
Technology • 0:00 / 0:00

Interactive Transcript

spk_0 Hey, Radio Lab. This is Lulu. Today, we're bringing you a story that begins with a very personal
spk_0 heartbreak. One that when you examine it, pull it up. You see is attached to this web of
spk_0 complex laws and decisions. It's this one very personal story with the potential to affect
spk_0 3 million people. Just a note that we originally reported this back in 2013 and in it, people use the
spk_0 word Indian to refer to indigenous Americans. That of course is a term that some folks who are
spk_0 indigenous use to describe themselves, but not all. So we want to acknowledge that one term is
spk_0 being used here to describe a huge, culturally diverse group of people. I'm very excited for you
spk_0 to hear this piece, which as you'll see is still just as relevant today. So here we go. Adoptive
spk_0 couple V baby girl. Yeah, wait, wait, wait, you're listening to Radio Lab from W and Y.
spk_0 Hey, I'm Chad. I'm Ron. I'm Robert Kylwitch. This is Radio Lab, the podcast. And today on the
spk_0 podcast, we are going to venture into new territory for us. We have the story of a little girl who
spk_0 became a very, very big deal. How big a deal did this little girl become a very big deal to
spk_0 about 500 something nations? They're on 500. No, there are. Look, I've seen the front of the U.A.
spk_0 No, there are. Just look, okay, it's going to make sense in about 30 seconds. That's a tease. It
spk_0 isn't ultimately even that important to the story. So just you and I are going to sit right here and
spk_0 behave ourselves and Tim Howard, our intrepid producer, is going to tell us this story. So I first, I
spk_0 first heard about this story. I saw it listed on the Supreme Court docket for cases that they
spk_0 were going to be hearing this spring. Well, the name of the case is Baby Girl versus Adoptive Couple.
spk_0 Actually, in strict legal parlance, it's called Adoptive Couple V Baby Girl. It's not a particularly
spk_0 catchy name. I gotta say it's a weird name though. It's hard to, it's hard to picture. Yeah. So this
spk_0 is Marsha Zug. Associate Professor of Law at the University of South Carolina. And she wrote
spk_0 about this case in slate. And it stood out to me because, you know, it just seemed odd at first
spk_0 that this would even be a Supreme Court case. It seemed more like a straightforward custody case.
spk_0 Right. But when you dig in, there's a lot going on here.
spk_0 Who says text messages? State law, errors, Supreme Court.
spk_0 Christopher Columbus. Christopher Columbus. And it is not straightforward at all.
spk_0 Apparently not. So let me walk you through it the way that I learned about it. The story begins
spk_0 with a couple. Matt and Melanie Capobionco, they are a couple who live down here in South Carolina.
spk_0 He's a technician at Boeing. She's a developmental psychologist.
spk_0 Nice middle class white couple. They're in their late 30s. And they really wanted to have a kid.
spk_0 They had gone through, you know, infertility problems. It wasn't working out. So eventually.
spk_0 They decided to adopt. Enter a woman named Chrissy Maldonado. She lives about a thousand miles away.
spk_0 I believe she's in Oklahoma. She's in her 20s. Already has a couple of kids. She's pregnant and
spk_0 decides that she wants to give the baby up for adoption. And she picks the capobioncos.
spk_0 And everyone seems happy. The capobioncos get the baby and they name her Veronica.
spk_0 We used to call her Boss Lady. Not a lot. Most of the time of his family.
spk_0 Our family called her that. Boss Lady. Boss is everybody around.
spk_0 This is Matt and Melanie, Capobionco. But you were happy to do it. She told you to do.
spk_0 She's just the poster child for a proud father, you know. But it's just as wrong as it could have possibly gone.
spk_0 This is basically how it unfolded on TV news.
spk_0 The broken session on the docket today, a young child ripped from the arms of the only parents
spk_0 she's ever known. And turned over to the Native American biological father she has never met.
spk_0 A man Veronica had never even met. What happened is when Veronica was two. Her biological dad turned up
spk_0 seemingly out of nowhere. And according to these clips had men around for two years, had abandoned
spk_0 the child and now he's asking for custody and he gets it. And the court is making them stand by
spk_0 and just let it happen. Wait, why? Well, it's mainly because of this law. Indian Child Welfare Act.
spk_0 The 1978 Indian Child Welfare Act. Dustin the dad, he's Cherokee. He's a part of the Cherokee
spk_0 Nation. So that makes his daughter Veronica eligible to be Cherokee. And the law is designed to keep
spk_0 Indian families together. It gives preference to Indian kids staying with Indian parents. So even
spk_0 though he'd actually signed papers agreeing to the adoption, he was able to invoke this law
spk_0 and get custody of Veronica. He signed his custody way and he was able to then use his
spk_0 Cherokeeness to reverse the rights he signed away. Just hang on. This is all going to make sense.
spk_0 Okay, but he takes the kid is what you're saying. Yeah. New Year's Eve 2011 with cameras rolling,
spk_0 Dustin Brown drives his pickup truck into Charleston. Matt and Melody Cabo Bianco clutched to two-year-old
spk_0 Veronica. This could possibly be the last time they hold their baby as her mom and dad.
spk_0 And that evening Veronica is transferred to Dustin. I didn't feel like we had enough time for
spk_0 to be not afraid when she's. We love to exchange it. Yeah, when she's I mean to her they're complete
spk_0 strangers and I can't imagine that she's not going to be terrified. And as Dustin gets into the
spk_0 truck holding his two-year-old daughter for the first time, the reporter asks him,
spk_0 and this is all you hear from him. I think so. We need to give her a chance. Have you ever seen the child
spk_0 before? They declined any further comment on camera. He gets into the truck with Veronica
spk_0 and they drive away, back to Oklahoma. Can I can I ask you what was the when was the last time that
spk_0 you spoke with Veronica? The day after the day after the transfer. Transfer. Oh, a phone call?
spk_0 Yeah, we spoke to her for about two minutes and we uh told her we loved her and she said,
spk_0 I love you mommy and I love you daddy and I don't know, just a few minutes and
spk_0 but that was that that was the last time we were able to be in touch. And that was 16 months ago.
spk_0 And how long was Veronica with them again before this happened? About two years. Oh man,
spk_0 that's hard. Yeah. And you know when I first heard about this case, that's basically the
spk_0 the only way I thought of it, you know, is just yeah, that's a crazy injustice. That's basically all I
spk_0 saw in it. I mean if you're someone who has no background in this, then you see a case like the baby
spk_0 Veronica case and you're like, whoa, where's this coming from? How can this possibly be okay?
spk_0 That's Marshall's Zug again. And her article for Slate kind of caught me off guard because the title
spk_0 was doing what's best for the tribe. Two-year-old Veronica was ripped from the only home she's ever known.
spk_0 The court made the right decision. Yeah. So I called up to ask her like what do you mean by that?
spk_0 So one of the things that's I think important to realize is that
spk_0 the problems that Iqua was intended to address didn't stop happening that long ago.
spk_0 And this is where the story turned into the biggest rabbit hole I've ever fallen into.
spk_0 What did she tell you? I mean, Marshall basically said the only way you can begin to wrap your mind
spk_0 around what's right and what's wrong in this story is to go back to the 60s.
spk_0 How are you doing? How are you Tim? Great to meet you. And to this guy.
spk_0 Herhosh. I'm a lawyer. He lives in Long Island now, which is where I visited him.
spk_0 But in 1967. The fall of 1967. I was on the staff of the association on American Indian affairs.
spk_0 Sort of a legal advocacy group for American Indians. And he traveled all over working with different
spk_0 tribes. And one day he gets a phone call from this guy, Lewis Goodhouse. The tribal chair of the
spk_0 Devil's Lake Sioux tribe in North Dakota. And this guy says I really need your help.
spk_0 He said there was a child. A Devil's Lake kid, one of ours, that was just abruptly taken away by
spk_0 social workers. The Benson County North Dakota Social Services Agency came in and they took
spk_0 little Ivan Brown away from his grandmother. He was six. Or was there stated reason for taking Ivan
spk_0 away neglect because what because grandma wasn't wasn't around. No actually bird says that the
spk_0 social workers were looking for that classic nuclear family biological mother biological father
spk_0 children. So when they saw him with an older relative but no mom or dad they thought uh-oh
spk_0 and they took him away. The tribal council was extremely upset by this. They wanted to fight a
spk_0 bird. Took the case fought it in court. We won that case by the way. Mrs. Alex forney,
spk_0 she got Ivan back after somewhat protracted battle. But he began to wonder how widespread is this?
spk_0 So from 67 to the end of 68 into 69. He visited tribe after tribe after tribe. Doing interviews and he
spk_0 says that everywhere he went he would hear these stories. I remember it's dead with place. This is
spk_0 Deb Wells. She's a member of the Rosebud Sioux tribe and when she was 10 years old a car
spk_0 pulled into her driveway. They come driving in social workers and they got out of the car and I told
spk_0 my brothers and sisters I said go high and they had to drag it out from underneath bed because we got
spk_0 around and got in the house. But then they took it to that's bluff and put it in the foster home.
spk_0 This was just part of every native family's history. This is Marla Jean Bigboy. She grew up on the
spk_0 Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota. I remember when I was young we'd go to one of the border towns
spk_0 and my grandma would say stay in the car, lock yourself in, don't get out of the car and going
spk_0 into the trading post because they're going to steal you. Really? Yeah. What we found is that on every
spk_0 reservation, name is Michael Evans No Heart. I'm a full blood pump out of Dakota from Standing Rock
spk_0 to Reservation. You couldn't not find a family that didn't know of age child in placement.
spk_0 The social services came and took me in my sister and told my mother and dad that they were
spk_0 taking us into the yogurt for physical kick-up and they got out of the back.
spk_0 Wow. Michael says that his dad spent the next 30 years looking for him. In any case,
spk_0 Bert would ask these people that he was interviewing, what reason did the social workers give you for
spk_0 taking the child and the answers that he got ran the gamut? Conditions of poverty, alcoholism,
spk_0 overcrowding, maybe they don't have adequate ventilation in the house, no indoor plumbing,
spk_0 but in most cases he says the reasons wouldn't have stood up in court. They would put papers in
spk_0 front of them and they would sign, they didn't know what they were signing. Some families,
spk_0 if they could, they tried to fight it, but they usually couldn't afford to. Look, the tribal people
spk_0 are poor, so we began to do a statistical collection of data, state by state. Asking how many
spk_0 Indian kids are in foster care? Foster care in adoptive placement and institutional placement,
spk_0 juvenile facilities. And what he arrived at at the end of that analysis is a pretty shocking number.
spk_0 About one third of Indian children were in out of home placements in non-Indian settings.
spk_0 One third? 25 to 35% of Indian children nationwide were in out of home placements.
spk_0 That's a real number? That is a real number. That's the number you see cited again and again.
spk_0 Nobody connected the dots. Everybody thought that it was their own personal tragedy. Nobody
spk_0 realized that this was a pattern and a practice that was decimating these tribes. Wait a second,
spk_0 wait a second. How would this happen on this scale? I mean like, is this just a bunch of social
spk_0 workers making the same decision independently or is it like a policy? Well, this is basically
spk_0 social workers very much acting in the spirit of the day because you have to keep in mind that in the
spk_0 50s and 60s, you have all these government policies that are put in place whose entire purpose is
spk_0 basically to try to once and for all solve this Indian problem that's gone on and on. You've
spk_0 got this guy in 1953 who's a senator from Utah who starts basically trying to terminate the
spk_0 tribes. You mean like take away their sovereignty? Yeah, he goes to tribe to tribe try to convince them
spk_0 or force them tell them they have no there's no way out of it. He argues that this will be best for
spk_0 all of them. I remember this. This was like out of Ippler, but it's unam like to integrate them
spk_0 into the whole. They will melt into the wider culture. That's what will save them. Part of this was
spk_0 part of the social workers that were working in this period. They were working under the auspices
spk_0 of this thing called the Indian adoption project which was very much about that idea of like,
spk_0 you take these kids from their poor conditions and you connect them directly to white families that
spk_0 are looking to adopt. So part of this was definitely top down very much. In any case, the end result
spk_0 of this is that a third of these kids are being taken away. There were literally communities where
spk_0 there were no children. That's Terry Cross, he's the executive director of the National Indian Child
spk_0 Welfare Association. In Minnesota there were communities where there were no children. In Alaska,
spk_0 there were communities where there were no children. I mean, what is what is a culture except
spk_0 the ideas and traditions that you pass on to your kids? That's Marcia Zugigan. If you are
spk_0 hemorrhaging your children, then you're going to disappear. So what do you do? Well, it's too
spk_0 massive a problem if you're trying to fight all these removals of kids on a case-by-case basis,
spk_0 forget about it. A national law is needed. So, Bert spent years walking the halls of Congress
spk_0 literally. Endless law being congressional hearings until finally. The Indian Child Welfare Act is
spk_0 passed by Congress in 1978. So it does a lot, but basically when it comes to adoptions,
spk_0 the Iqua has placement preferences. So the first preference would be with the immediate family.
spk_0 So you remove from mom, your place with dad, or maybe with grandmother. If they say no,
spk_0 second preference would be someone else in the tribe. And the third is any other American
spk_0 Indian. Well, any other. Yeah. And then after that, then the child could be placed with, you know,
spk_0 another family. Well, so if you're white and you're trying to adopt an Indian kid,
spk_0 you have a lot of rope walks. Yes. But by and large, most of us think that Iqua was probably
spk_0 the best federal Indian law ever passed. It did the most to help Indian tribes,
spk_0 respect tribal sovereignty, and really fulfill the United States' trust relationship
spk_0 with American Indian people. But now, because of this case,
spk_0 that law may be in jeopardy.
spk_0 We'll continue in a moment.
spk_0 Hey, I'm Lulu and this is an ad by BetterHelp. BetterHelp Therapists have helped over 5
spk_0 million people worldwide on their mental health journeys. That's millions of stories,
spk_0 millions of journeys. And behind everyone is a therapist who showed up, listened, and helped
spk_0 someone take a step forward. Moments in therapy, like the right question, a safe space to cry,
spk_0 or celebrate a small win can change lives. October 10th is World Mental Health Day.
spk_0 And BetterHelp is honoring those connections and therapists who make them possible. I happen to
spk_0 be married to a therapist. So in honor of World Mental Health Day, I am going to go home tonight
spk_0 and give her a kiss and thank her for all the people she has helped. The right therapists can
spk_0 make all the difference. And with over 30,000 therapists, BetterHelp is the world's largest
spk_0 online therapy platform. And BetterHelp does the initial matchmaking work for you so you can
spk_0 focus on working with the perfect therapist to meet your specific therapy goals. And if for some
spk_0 reason you aren't happy with your match, switch to a different therapist at any time whenever you want.
spk_0 This World Mental Health Day BetterHelp is celebrating the therapist who've helped
spk_0 millions of people take a step forward. If you're ready to find the right therapist for you,
spk_0 BetterHelp can help. RadioLab listeners will get 10% off their first month at BetterHelp.com
spk_0 slash radio lab. That's better H-E-L-P dot com slash radio lab.
spk_0 America is changing and so is the world. But what's happening in America isn't just the
spk_0 cause of global upheaval. It's also a symptom of disruption that's happening everywhere.
spk_0 I'm Asma Khalid in Washington DC. I'm Tristan Redman in London and this is the global story.
spk_0 Every weekday we'll bring you a story from this intersection where the world and America
spk_0 get meet. Listen on BBC dot com or wherever you get your podcasts.
spk_0 I'm Chad I'm Ron. I'm Robert Kilwich. This is RadioLab today.
spk_0 But look at a Supreme Court case that may determine the future of a law called the Indian Child
spk_0 Welfare Act or Iqua. The story comes from producer Tim Howard back to him.
spk_0 So in April I went to this conference in Tulsa. The Board of Directors, Council of Elders.
spk_0 Big room there are 700 people there. Most of them work in child welfare organizations
spk_0 in Indian communities around the country. There was some traditional Cherokee drumming,
spk_0 there were films, workshops and all anybody could talk about was this case. But there's no issue
spk_0 bigger now and how the baby Veronica case may affect the Indian child welfare act.
spk_0 So please, please do keep baby Veronica and her family in your prayers.
spk_0 Everybody was on edge. Well, I'm really worried in this situation.
spk_0 This is Terry Cross again. He's one of the organizers and he told me that look the Kapo Biancos.
spk_0 I feel for them but in what world is it okay for one family who feels they were damaged by a law
spk_0 to put thousands of other children at jeopardy for their own hurt. I can't imagine a world where that's
spk_0 okay. Well, I mean it's hard for us to say that because you know that's not what motivated us.
spk_0 Our daughters what's motivating us? How we feel we just feel that in this case it was a
spk_0 beautiful law that was put into place to prevent the breakup of families,
spk_0 Indian families and I just think it wasn't really supposed to be applied to situation like
spk_0 hours. They say but we get that there's a huge historical wrong here but what does that have
spk_0 to do with us? Reminds me of arguments that happen over affirmative action weirdly.
spk_0 Definitely but here the details are are so different. You know they say this is a law that was
spk_0 created to protect Indian families right. But here you've got a Hispanic birth mom,
spk_0 you got a white couple and then you got a dad who's out of the picture so you're not actually
spk_0 protecting an Indian family you're forcibly creating a new one. Absolutely. And in the process
spk_0 you're breaking up a loving home. I don't think that was the intent of the law ever.
spk_0 My personal opinion is that Equa has outlived its usefulness and causes more problems than
spk_0 its all. This is Mark Fiddler. I'm one of the attorneys for Matt and Melanie Kapo Bianco. He also
spk_0 happens to be Native American himself. I'm an enrolled member of the Turtle Mountain Band of
spk_0 Chipway Indians. That's a reservation up in North Dakota right on the board with Canada. You know
spk_0 so I kind of had a foot and two cultures so to speak. I go back to the rest in the summer and
spk_0 Mark actually used to argue the other side that the most important thing was to keep Indian families
spk_0 together and that Indian kids who were placed in non-Indian homes would experience emotional
spk_0 psychological harm by being raised outside of the culture. But then I had a case in I think
spk_0 it was 94 which gave him pause. Ah boy that's a good word. It was a case in which this young
spk_0 American Indian girl Sierra wanted to be adopted by this white couple and Mark opposed it.
spk_0 Even though on my heart of heart I knew it was probably not the right thing for the child.
spk_0 He won the case. She was removed from the couple's home and um,
spk_0 Sierra would tell you herself she had she had a really rough life.
spk_0 She bounced in and out of more than 20 foster homes ran away many many times and got into serious
spk_0 trouble with the law. And it always nagged me. Mark says even though the tribes have suffered
spk_0 that doesn't change the fact that if you take a kid out of a loving home you're going to cause
spk_0 her real harm. And he says that's why he took this case. Because the couple of young girls,
spk_0 you know they are um, among the most loving people I know. He says they did everything you could
spk_0 ask. They're just amazing people. They met the birth mother, Kristi Moldonato when she was pregnant.
spk_0 They got to know her. She felt a connection to them. That's Laurie McGill's. She's represented
spk_0 Kristi since last year. And they were also willing to have an open adoption. Yeah we still have a
spk_0 relationship with Kristi. We love it a death. And Kristi gave birth to Veronica. They were there
spk_0 with her in the delivery room. Yeah I mean the day she was born I cut the cord. Matt,
spk_0 Copapianco cut the umbilical cord. So that's such a degree of intimacy that I know. I know. I mean
spk_0 having given birth twice myself the idea that anyone other than my husband would be uh in the room
spk_0 is kind of scary but that it gives you some idea how she felt about the Copapiancos.
spk_0 Now as for Dustin Brown Veronica is biological dad. A couple months before she was born Kristi,
spk_0 the birth mom, sent him a text message asking him if he wants to pay child support or he wants to
spk_0 wave his rights. And he replied I'll wave my rights. Rather than pay a dime in child support.
spk_0 Well there's the contrast. So in the beginning it sounds like he did not want to be a dad. Yeah
spk_0 and then actually a few months later he seems to make it even more official by signing a form
spk_0 agreeing to the adoption. And then he changes his mind? Yeah you know and and obviously I was
spk_0 wondering what was he thinking because you can't avoid the fact that how you feel about this guy
spk_0 is going to influence how you feel about this law. Yeah. And so I was trying to get in touch with him.
spk_0 I was pestering his lawyers um you know will he do an interview this one on for weeks and and they
spk_0 were basically like he doesn't want to do interviews. He doesn't want to talk. Yeah yeah so you didn't get him.
spk_0 Yeah I got him. So shortly before we're going to wrap this story I get an email saying come to
spk_0 Oklahoma. So when? He lives in this one story house on this tree line block in a small town north of
spk_0 Tulsa. Hey how's it going? Doing good? Okay. What did it look like? He's just a very normal looking guy
spk_0 a little bit of an army haircut. He had a stash that night when he got Veronica but he's clean
spk_0 shaving now. A big smile. So anyway we go inside and the first thing he tells me is that Veronica is not
spk_0 there. She was out with his wife Robin. Turns out he's remarried. In any case,
spk_0 test test, all right we sat down at the kitchen table and started talking. Do you mind just you
spk_0 mind introducing yourself and tell me like where we are? I'm Dustin Brown. We're in Noah
spk_0 Oklahoma. This is my house. I'm part of the Wolf clan. Wolf clan is one of the seven Cherokee
spk_0 and my name Dustin meets Brave Warrior in Cherokee. And actually you know join the army up and
spk_0 go over to Iraq. I'm like wow I'm here for the Cherokee. I'm the Brave Warrior out in you know desert.
spk_0 He's been registered member since he was a little kid. His parents were members and their parents
spk_0 and he said he's proud to be Cherokee basically because it means that he's from where he lives.
spk_0 It's a big deal to me. So anyway we started talking about the case and you know it gets complicated.
spk_0 There's a lot of detail. I'm not going to go into all of it but basically he and Kristi Maldonado,
spk_0 the birth mom. We've known each other since we were 16. We've dated off and on.
spk_0 2008 he joins the army. Basic training. He lives on a base. It's for us away.
spk_0 And Christmas time that year he basically says let's get serious. Got down on one knee and proposed
spk_0 to her and said hey I want to bring you to my life. She said okay that's just great. And almost a
spk_0 month later she sent me a message saying that she was pregnant and I was excited. I mean I have
spk_0 children but her was one of the things I wanted her at that time. Told her I can move you and
spk_0 your kids up to the base. Housing was going to be free on base. There was schools for her kids.
spk_0 She could get a job right there on base. You know everything was taken care of. I mean everything
spk_0 was going great. And then pretty quickly the whole thing just soured. It's impossible to know
spk_0 exactly what happened but Kristi says that Dustin just simply didn't offer any support. He says that
spk_0 he did. He tried to at least but shortly after she got pregnant she basically just shut him out
spk_0 and stopped taking his calls. I didn't get no phone calls. No text messages. Nothing from
spk_0 rather blue and I'm just like what's going on. He says that he tried to get in touch with her.
spk_0 Texting her up trying to call her. Still no answer. There's a couple times that I've went back to
spk_0 the barge and went to her house. Drove those four hours from the base. Knocked on the door. I could hear
spk_0 voices in the house. It sounded like her and the kids. They wouldn't answer the door for me.
spk_0 Then one day he says she sent me a message saying I don't want to be with you no more. And three
spk_0 weeks after that she's like well I want you to sign your rights over. His parental rights. Would
spk_0 you sign your rights over? You guys are texting this? Who are you talking? The whole time we're
spk_0 text messaging this because she wouldn't talk to me. What did you think it meant? To me I just
spk_0 thought she wanted me to sign my rights over her and I'm like this is something I really don't want
spk_0 to do. He says she kept texting him that question and looming in his mind was the fact that he just
spk_0 learned. We were going to be going direct to do a radar mission so. And he starts to wonder what's
spk_0 the right thing to do here? You know if there was one of them chances I wasn't going to come back I wanted
spk_0 to make the right choice and let the mother be that sole parent. And he says that he's holding out hope
spk_0 that if he does make it back. We'll get back together and she'll just change her mind. Finally I just
spk_0 told her I was like all right I'll sign my rights over. Months go by. Christie has the baby. He
spk_0 says he doesn't know exactly when because they weren't speaking. But then six days before I had to
spk_0 go deploy the Iraq I get a phone call from some guy in Washington County. A process server. Said hey
spk_0 when he'd you sign the papers to sign your rights over. The guy directed him to an office right
spk_0 near the base went there and signed the paper and what did you think it meant. The whole time I thought
spk_0 I was just you know the paperwork for me sign. Kusty writes to her but when I got done sign the guy
spk_0 said he just signed your rights away instead of the biological mother. The baby's been up for adoption.
spk_0 She's been living South Carolina for four months.
spk_0 Dustin says this is the first moment that he realized what was actually happening. That the baby
spk_0 was up for adoption and he says that he had no idea he had just legally consented to it.
spk_0 I should have had a lawyer there with me at that point in time I grabbed the paper
spk_0 and the guy looked at me said if you're going to rip that up he said it's a
spk_0 it's not good to do that. That he could be arrested. And I said what do I gotta do?
spk_0 He said you get a lawyer which he immediately did. And that's why the courts have ruled in his
spk_0 favor because they say that from that moment he's clearly demonstrated that he wants to be her dad.
spk_0 I mean I never never once did I want to give up on my daughter. Never once did I want to give her up.
spk_0 I mean everybody says that I gave her up. I never wanted to. Now Mark and Laurie say that if this were
spk_0 any other guy. Any other man of any other race. The story would be over right about here. It's too late.
spk_0 He wouldn't have any rights at all. Under every state's laws, too late, under the federal constitution,
spk_0 too late, he rejected that opportunity to become a father. But he has one thing in his favor says
spk_0 Laurie. He happens to be Cherokee. And because of that fact. Not only can this sort of man object,
spk_0 but he gets an automatic transfer of custody to him. And Mark and Laurie see that as basically
spk_0 the worst kind of preferential treatment. And that is unbelievable. This is John Nichols. This is
spk_0 Shannon. Shannon Jones. They're two of Dustin's lawyers. And John says, okay, there's preferential
spk_0 treatment. Fine. But think about why all the protections of Iqua are there. These roadblocks are
spk_0 there for a reason. We went over this earlier, but you know, basically people are being manipulated
spk_0 out of their kids. And while you might like to think that that's ancient history. Now fast forward
spk_0 to 2010. He says the same thing is happening in this case. And we have a registered member of the
spk_0 Cherokee Nation. We have his child being given up for adoption without his knowledge and without
spk_0 his consent. And they kept this adoption from him for months and then spring it on him six days
spk_0 before he leads the country. It looks to us like it was engineered to make sure he got served,
spk_0 but not in enough time to where he could put up a fight. I believe it was absolutely intentional.
spk_0 And Shannon suggests that they knew about Iqua they knew it would apply and they were trying
spk_0 to sidestep. There were so many errors. You just did a little air quotes on errors. Yeah, I did.
spk_0 Because I mean, like for example, there's this one important form where Shannon says that they
spk_0 went out of their way to make it look like Veronica is not Native America. Because it would be
spk_0 preposterous argument in the form. Mark and Laurie say the reason that nobody puts Cherokee
spk_0 in big bright flaming letters is simple. Christie herself is predominantly Hispanic. Dustin is
spk_0 predominantly Caucasian and is approximately 2% Cherokee. What? Did you say 2%? Yeah, Veronica
spk_0 herself would be a little bit over 1%. Wait, this whole thing is happening because he's only 2%.
spk_0 Well, she looked at changes things somehow. Well, yeah, but you have to keep in mind that Cherokee
spk_0 Nation doesn't care about the percentage of Cherokee in your blood. That's not how they
spk_0 determine their members. Being a member of the Cherokee Nation is like being a member of the United
spk_0 States. You are a citizen of the nation. You know, if if you're a parent of US citizen, you're
spk_0 automatically a citizen. That's Christy Nemo assistant attorney general for Cherokee Nation.
spk_0 If you're parents of Cherokee citizen, you're not automatically a citizen. But you can automatically
spk_0 apply. So it's based on direct lineage. But still, you're right because this is the argument
spk_0 that is most troubling to the tribes. Both Christy Nemo and Marsha Zug told me that if the Supreme
spk_0 Court ends up deciding that... Equa is unconstitutional because it really is race based,
spk_0 unconstitutional because it's a race based preference. It calls into question every single
spk_0 federal Indian law out. There goes Indian law. This is a case that they could use to do that.
spk_0 If Equa falls because it's unconstitutional, it could have a crazy domino effect.
spk_0 Every single federal Indian law is premised on giving some sort of special treatment to Indians.
spk_0 What would that mean concretely if Indian law were to go away?
spk_0 It means that they're policing their court system, their education, anything they do as a sovereign
spk_0 nation. All of that just evaporates. A tribe would just become another group of people on some land.
spk_0 That said, this is not the likely outcome. Now, the Supreme Court will probably rule as narrowly
spk_0 as they possibly can. And as far as the tribes are concerned, they can do a lot of damage to the
spk_0 law without calling it unconstitutional. They could allow for this certain kind of exception to
spk_0 Equa, which would make it a lot easier for people like the Kapo Pioncos to adopt. So they could
spk_0 rule any number of ways. Yeah. And the thing is that it's all strangely connected to this
spk_0 three-year-old girl. Hold something for this. I'm thinking I'm just going to sign Kestra right
spk_0 so. So when she finally showed up, halfway through my interview with Dustin.
spk_0 Hi. It was kind of surreal. This is my daughter Veronica though. Daddy. Hey Veronica, I'm Tim.
spk_0 She's got dark curly hair. She's just ball of energy. She's definitely bullheaded.
spk_0 And within a minute, she's giving me a tour of every single object in her room.
spk_0 I mean, everything. Who's that? Army Bear. Army Bear. You got one of Daddy's dog tags on it?
spk_0 She was a very, very proud host. A few minutes later, she wanted to show me her geese.
spk_0 I don't think I've seen geese in a long time. About two. About two.
spk_0 Does her, does her reel? Geese? Yeah. She feeds them out of her hands.
spk_0 Come on. Come on.
spk_0 So what could happen to her? Well, if the Supreme Court said Dustin Brown shouldn't have qualified
spk_0 as father under Iqwa, what they do is they would send it back down to a South Carolina court.
spk_0 And then they would have this new best interest evaluation. Basically, like what's the best thing
spk_0 for her at this point? She's been with him now for about a year and a half. And so that actually
spk_0 might really change the calculation. You know, and honestly, hanging out with her and Dustin
spk_0 in the backyard is really easy to forget. All these people whose lives are just completely tangled
spk_0 up in this scene. But who aren't there? Christine Maldonado, the birthmall. She did not intend to give
spk_0 Veronica up. She intended to give Veronica a life. Matt and Melanie Kapo Bianco. I mean, this has
spk_0 been going on for so long. We've kind of been in a holding pattern for like, well, forever.
spk_0 We're just waiting and waiting and waiting. And of course, the hundreds of tribes who
spk_0 are just worried about their own kids. Pretty cool. Are you a good swimmer? Yes. I'm a bad swimmer.
spk_0 I'm a bad swimmer. You're not. You're a good swimmer. No. I'm a pretty bad swimmer. No, you're not.
spk_0 You're a good swimmer. How do you know I'm a good swimmer? I know you're a good swimmer. You're a good
spk_0 swimmer. You're a good swimmer. You're a good swimmer. You're a good swimmer. You're a good swimmer.
spk_0 So the Supreme Court came to a decision on this ruling about a month after we first aired this
spk_0 podcast. And here's what they said. Okay. So the Supreme Court ruled five four in favor of the
spk_0 adoptive couple, which is to say against the birth father. To Dustin Brown the dad lost. Right.
spk_0 It was like a 60 page ruling and not being totally confident what all the ramifications were.
spk_0 I just made some calls. Hi, how are you? I'm doing great. How are you? For example, I
spk_0 skyped with Marsha Zug, who you remember from the piece. She's a law professor at the University
spk_0 of South Carolina. Can you walk me through what this opinion means? Well, in terms of Veronica's
spk_0 placement had it come out the other way, then it would be over. She would stay with Dustin Brown,
spk_0 her biological father, end of story. What we have now is the court upholding the termination of
spk_0 his parental rights. So basically the Supreme Court ruled that Dustin Brown shouldn't have been
spk_0 allowed to invoke the Indian child welfare act because he didn't have what's called continuing
spk_0 custody of Veronica. Continuing custody. Right. They argue that this laws about preventing the
spk_0 breakup of Indian families and there was no Indian family here because they didn't live together.
spk_0 The dad and the daughter didn't live together. Right. So they don't scrap the Indian child welfare
spk_0 act. They just say that it shouldn't apply in a case like this. So that says narrow as you can get
spk_0 probably. Yeah. But I'm not crazy. But what happens now when the case where does the case go from
spk_0 here? Well, the Supreme Court kicked it back down to a lower court where you'd expect that they
spk_0 just award the couple Biancos custody. And that's what this guy said. So this is going back to
spk_0 South Carolina and to the State Supreme Court. This is to gender sing. He's a contributor at
spk_0 SCO-DISPLOG. And a council at the law firm Goldstein and Russell which practices before the Supreme
spk_0 Court. So the case goes to the South Carolina Supreme Court. And then Dale probably pushed the case
spk_0 down to their lower courts to make further decisions about whether the father has standing to
spk_0 object adoption and assuming he doesn't after this decision, you know, whether the adoption can
spk_0 just become finalized. So it sounds like the capo Biancos will ultimately get Veronica back.
spk_0 Possibly. Yeah. But Marcia says that there's a chance that it might not go that way. So now she's
spk_0 up for adoption, right? This is where it gets complicated. So because the Supreme Court said that
spk_0 Iqua still stands. It's still law. Okay. And they said that Veronica is an Indian child.
spk_0 She's Cherokee. Okay. That means that the South Carolina Supreme Court could decide that she is
spk_0 still covered by the Indian Child Well for Act. My understanding of the case, they're not saying that
spk_0 Iqua doesn't apply with the placement preferences. You remember the placement preferences? Yeah.
spk_0 The court decides that this is still an Iqua case. Then those preferences would kick in.
spk_0 So if you recall, according to Iqua, when an Indian child is placed for adoption, her extended family
spk_0 members would be given first preference, right? This is the Langell. Langell, Maldonado, Joseph,
spk_0 and Lynch professor of law, Seton Hall University School of Law. So in an Iqua case, the first
spk_0 preference is extended family. Second preference. Other members of the Cherokee tribe would be next
spk_0 in line. Third preference. Other Indian families. This means an Indian family from any of the 562
spk_0 federally recognized tribes. And then finally, any other family, such as the couple of young
spk_0 girls. So if the South Carolina Supreme Court decides that this is still an Iqua case. And if.
spk_0 The paternal grandparents, fellow petitions to adopt, they are at the very top of the mandatory
spk_0 placement preferences. And the couple of young girls are at the very bottom.
spk_0 So it's possible the couple of young girls might not get custody. Yeah. And Marcia even says that there's
spk_0 a chance that Dustin Brown himself. My guess is that Dustin Brown will come forward to adopt Veronica.
spk_0 His rights were terminated because he failed to support, but now we've got basically two years
spk_0 worth of evidence of him loving and supporting and taking care of her. And the court's not going to
spk_0 ignore that. It's just so crazy to think though that this guy who's the biological father
spk_0 may ultimately become the adoptive father. That's insane. Yes. Damn, this is complicated. I thought
spk_0 that they were supposed to get less complicated. You know, John Nichols, Dustin Brown's lawyer, he's
spk_0 said to me that this is totally uncharted waters. That he's never seen a case of this magnitude.
spk_0 Get decided by the Supreme Court and still be so open-ended. What's the time table on this?
spk_0 So John said that they expect to hear something from the South Carolina Supreme Court
spk_0 on Monday, July 8th, just laying out what the next steps are. So Tim, let me ask you, we spent
spk_0 a fair amount of time in the story examining the worst case scenario from the Tribes' perspective
spk_0 that this case could be used as a kind of Trojan horse to say that all of Indian law is an unfair
spk_0 race-based preference and therefore should be negated. I'm gathering from what you just said
spk_0 that that did not come to pass. No, that didn't happen. But there is this sense that they kind of
spk_0 planted a seed. For example, Justice Alito who wrote the ruling, he starts it off with mention
spk_0 of Veronica being 1.2% Cherokee, which is interesting because it sounds like he's about to make an
spk_0 argument for why this is a race-based preference and why it's a violation of equal protection.
spk_0 He's about to go nuclear if that's how he starts. Exactly, which to me was kind of baffling
spk_0 because why would you start off with this massive footprint and then leave a very small one?
spk_0 Is it to send a message? So, anyway, I asked Marsha what she thought about it. Why do you think
spk_0 they started it off that way? I've been thinking about that. It clearly sat wrong with at least some
spk_0 members of the court. I mean, when listening to the oral arguments, you could tell that.
spk_0 Robert's harped on it as well. It might have been that that was too big an issue to address in
spk_0 this case that they weren't ready to, but I think it's an indication that at least some members of
spk_0 the court have serious reservations about Indian law because they just don't see Veronica as an
spk_0 Indian child. To them, Indian is a race and she doesn't have enough blood to be of that race.
spk_0 It's a possible indication of where future Indian law cases are going to go.
spk_0
spk_0 producer Tim Howard. Thanks Tim.
spk_0 Okay, it's Lulu again back in 2025. And as you just heard, there were sort of two categories of
spk_0 lingering questions. One about what would happen to Veronica and the other about the Indian Child
spk_0 Welfare Act. So ultimately, Veronica's case wound up in Family Court, which found that without
spk_0 the application of Iqua, Dustin could not intervene. One week after her fourth birthday,
spk_0 Veronica was returned to the Capobiancos in South Carolina. And a few months after that, Dustin and
spk_0 the Cherokee Nation announced that they would not continue pursuing the case. And Veronica's life
spk_0 became much more private after that away from all the attention of the courts. She's now 16 years old.
spk_0 As for the Indian Child Welfare Act, Iqua, it's faced repeated challenges in the past 12 years.
spk_0 The biggest one was in 2023, but at that time, the Supreme Court upheld Iqua 7-2.
spk_0 So for now, it is alive and affirmed at the national level. But not without continued challenges,
spk_0 including a case brought before the Minnesota Supreme Court just this year challenging Iqua again.
spk_0 That case has not been decided.
spk_0 Thanks so much for listening. We'll be back next week.
spk_0 Hi.
spk_0 Hi, I'm Sarah Michael, calling from Madison, New Jersey. And here are the staff credits.
spk_0 Radio Lab was created by Chad Abumrod and is edited by Soren Wheeler.
spk_0 Lulu Miller and Lutth Nasser are our cohosts. Dylan Keef is our director of sound design.
spk_0 Our staff includes Simon Abler, Jeremy Bloom, W. Harry Fortuna, David Gabel, Maria Paz Guquiertes,
spk_0 Sindun Yana Sambandam, Matt Kielty, Annie McEwen, Alex Niesen, Zara Kari, Sarah Sandback,
spk_0 Anisa Vipsa, Arianne Wack, Pat Walters, Molly Webster, and Jessica Young, with help from Rebecca
spk_0 Rand. Our fact checkers are Diane Kelly, Emily Krieger, Anna Pugiel-Montini, and Natalie Middleton.
spk_0 Hi, I'm Maddie and I'm from Frederick, Maryland. Leadership Support for Radio Lab Science
spk_0 programming is provided by the Simmons Foundation and the John Templeton Foundation.
spk_0 Foundational Support for Radio Lab was provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
spk_0 Since WNYC's first broadcast in 1924, we've been dedicated to creating the kind of content we
spk_0 know the world needs. In addition to this award-winning reporting, your sponsorship also supports
spk_0 inspiring storytelling and extraordinary music that is free and accessible to all. To get in touch
spk_0 and find out more, visit sponsorship.wnyc.org.