Sports
Special Episode: Interview with Wes Marshall (Author: Killed by a Traffic Engineer)
In this special episode of the Denver Urbanism Podcast, host James Warren interviews Wes Marshall, author of 'Killed by a Traffic Engineer' and co-host of the podcast 'Look Both Ways....
Special Episode: Interview with Wes Marshall (Author: Killed by a Traffic Engineer)
Sports •
0:00 / 0:00
Interactive Transcript
spk_0
Hello, I'm James Warren with the Denver Urbanism Podcast and today I'm joined for a very special interview with West Marshall
spk_0
West is a professor here in Denver at CU Denver
spk_0
He's the author of killed by a traffic engineer and he has a pretty new podcast with David Zipper
spk_0
I do yeah called look both ways. It's phenomenal right now. There's four episodes out of let's not all of them
spk_0
I would recommend everybody go listen
spk_0
So thanks for coming on the show
spk_0
Yeah, thanks for having me. Yeah, podcast things been fun so far. Yeah, we're doing our fifth episode next week
spk_0
Yeah, really puts our podcast to shame. I was like oh god. We gotta be doing that better. We gotta be
spk_0
We're figuring out as we go the technology's been like the trickiest part always is yeah, I think I'm my microphone is
spk_0
Rock solid now. Heck yeah, yeah, we've had to toss out a couple of things I messed up recording but
spk_0
Why don't we start with you know a lot of our listeners and viewers will already know who you are
spk_0
But why don't you start with look both ways? Why is your podcast called that?
spk_0
So it's not called that because we think that's good advice for like a DOT to be giving people right is called that because we're trying to look
spk_0
Both ways of transportation issues like we start off each podcast by saying it's a pragmatic look at transportation
spk_0
So we're not trying to be just
spk_0
reactive and say this is bad. This is bad
spk_0
I'm so when David would say like oh fair-free trans is bad. I'm trying to look at the other side of it like well
spk_0
Here's some good things about something like that that could come out of that so I think the interesting thing about these topics is
spk_0
There's usually no single right answer
spk_0
So trying to look at things from different issues like you know one of the names we discard it was like roundabout
spk_0
Yeah, looking around the topics look both ways just kind of rolled off the time a little bit better
spk_0
Sure, yeah, so I don't know that that's yeah
spk_0
Not too much time come a bit names and it's a very important part of the process. Yeah, so you know
spk_0
On the subject of safety
spk_0
We this past weekend just had another tragic pedestrian death
spk_0
It happened on 14th Avenue in West Coast facts
spk_0
This is a street that I know particularly well. I used to live in the neighborhood now
spk_0
I live in a Jason neighborhood and I know all these safety advocates in that area have been fighting specifically about
spk_0
14th for just years sitting down with the director of transportation and all kinds of people from Doddy and saying hey
spk_0
People go too fast here. Hey slow this down. Hey, these are the things that we want and not somebody's dead
spk_0
It's not the first time somebody's died in this area. So I have two questions one like do you have anything that you would say to the advocates who are I think are
spk_0
Reeling right now and not sure how to feel in this moment and then to do you have anything that you would say to you know
spk_0
That the folks who are responsible for this at a city level
spk_0
It's a terrible tragedy. I mean
spk_0
It gives us something to talk about and try to use the security get better the same time like this should not be happening
spk_0
Like we can do better and you know at least on my side of Denver like 13th and 14th are there one way couplets. Yeah, right
spk_0
I'm not saying like one way
spk_0
Necessarily is bad, but the way they're designed is like a many highway. Yeah, right?
spk_0
So at one point we were trying to do a research study just to look at the big drop off and like property values going from like
spk_0
13th to 12 like yeah living on some of those one-way
spk_0
Streets where cars are moving fast they're oftentimes like three lanes of one way traffic
spk_0
It would be tough to live on and I feel bad, but it also is even tougher to like walk or bike on like they're not meant for that
spk_0
I know it is trying to kind of pull some of the traffic off of coalfax, but there are better ways to do it
spk_0
Like we have a grid in these neighborhoods like we can use the grid more efficiently
spk_0
But you know trying to do it in the way that we've done it
spk_0
It's we it does it goes against everything we know about safety in so many different ways
spk_0
So you gotta I mean that's been on my bucket list of things that fix in Denver for a long time. So
spk_0
You know sadly when stuff like this happens it gives the advocates an opportunity to try to talk people in the change because I
spk_0
Sometimes hard to argue with safety stuff like yeah, you've probably been in those meetings for people do say oh
spk_0
I don't want this like it doesn't look good and it's like well, this is for safety and you would never
spk_0
Ever like tell us structural engineer to use a bigger beam because some
spk_0
Neighborhood crank says that they don't like the size of the beam
spk_0
But we do that with transportation all time. Yeah, just let the loudest voice in the room tell us not to do something that we know is good for safety
spk_0
Because they don't want it for their neighborhood and that's like as an engineer that was
spk_0
Started off on the structural side it feels crazy to me, but yeah, I know full well why that happens because we've
spk_0
Precured rated some atrocities with
spk_0
You know highways through neighborhoods and all that sort of stuff we did so we need this public participation process, but
spk_0
When it comes to safety we should have some the way to do what we know is safer
spk_0
Yeah, on that subject I want to start a little bit granular and then maybe zoom in a little bit. So
spk_0
Denver has the vision zero rapid response program where they come in somebody's been
spk_0
severely injured or killed by a car and or by a car driver, you know, maybe an engineer. I don't know
spk_0
and
spk_0
They implement some type of solution based on what happened there
spk_0
I know that sometimes this isn't always done in a way that
spk_0
You know, I think it's a little underfunded. I'm thinking of one example specifically where they added a lane of parking
spk_0
To a street to you know narrow the street a little bit practically. Yeah
spk_0
You're also blocking an car infrastructure. You're making that a little bit of a less nice place to walk
spk_0
I mean, there's other kind of ramifications of that
spk_0
From a vision zero rapid response kind of what are you seeing around the world that's working to address some of those safety things and
spk_0
You know, what could we bring home? Well, the start with I would say the rapid response team is a great first step
spk_0
Because most places when somebody gets hurt
spk_0
They don't want to change anything because they feel like if they change it
spk_0
They're sort of admitting that it was their fault in some way the fact that Denver's willing to go out there and look
spk_0
What could we have done better yeah and change it in the short term is a huge step forward
spk_0
So in this country. I don't only know in New York if having a similar type thing
spk_0
So in Denver start of that I was like this is great. So my safety class that I teach we go out there with
spk_0
That team and take a tour of a particular thing. So we see how they work
spk_0
But when you see how they work too like one of the members of their team is the the officer right so the officers reading off
spk_0
The crash report and the crash report is blaming the humans for whatever happened
spk_0
Just the way I talked about and in terms of the way all our crashes can easily be too easily be blamed on the humans. So
spk_0
A lot of times they're all listening to that and it's like oh, we need to educate people better
spk_0
We need to enforce better
spk_0
But if you take a step back and look at like these intersections or whatever it is like the one we saw last time
spk_0
A lot of the things are so obvious like where the pedestrian
spk_0
Got killed they were crossing spear near cul-fax
spk_0
And where they were coming out of there's a huge
spk_0
Cabinet for the signal right blocking the
spk_0
Vision line of the driver that is taking the right turn on the spear. Yeah, there's no way for them to see the pedestrian right
spk_0
We've designed it in a way that would lead to these bad safety outcomes and then we get the bad safety outcomes
spk_0
And the fact that they're out there trying to do something like that's an issue where how do you move that cabinet?
spk_0
It's hard. It's extensive. So they were trying to do other stuff
spk_0
You know, maybe you were circling right turns on red would have helped that cause there's a lot of choice we could do but
spk_0
The fact that they're out there is a big first step. So how do we
spk_0
Do better they put more money into this? Yeah, get out there and you know, I would I actually have told them this like they need to
spk_0
Almost when they go out to see these crashes now don't just kind of walk around the intersection like pretend
spk_0
You're doing what that person was doing put yourself in their shoes try to understand why they were doing what they were doing
spk_0
Because the one we had seen the previous year like you see where the bite says is coming from and like what they were thinking
spk_0
Isn't going to be the same as what we were thinking when we were standing there to send an intersection kind of looking at the whole thing and yeah
spk_0
And kind of the grand scheme of things so you kind of have to do it and then you go to the perspective of the driver
spk_0
When you see where the bite says coming from there's no way they could have possibly seen them because yeah on that particle factors that big concrete thing over by like the
spk_0
You know whatever but there's right yeah, there are legitimate things that we could fix
spk_0
But you don't see that unless you kind of put yourself in their shoes and try to understand the situation they were in totally yeah, that makes a lot of sense
spk_0
Zooming out to you know, you you've talked about the a pillar on cars
spk_0
You've talked a little bit about clear zones next to highways and in larger arterials
spk_0
You know
spk_0
Some of this stuff I imagine is like
spk_0
Federal right like we're talking like if you want to fix the a pillar
spk_0
I think on the podcast you mentioned it's
spk_0
Cars have to support three times their way when they flip and we've got heavier and heavier cars and that's a result of a federal
spk_0
You know the cafe standards or whatever and and the 3x
spk_0
Weight requirements of federal standard and so like
spk_0
When we look at some of these systemic levers that can be pulled what can be done locally and what kind of if we just need to advocate to
spk_0
Higher levels that needs to be fixed. Well that a pillar example
spk_0
I think I mentioned was like a middle schooler from Maryland that yeah designed
spk_0
Basically they had a camera and they also had a car and they
spk_0
projected what they were seeing on the a pillar so when you're driving
spk_0
The a pillar looks like it's not even there because it's projecting what you would see right right
spk_0
Like if a middle schooler can come up with that for their science fair project
spk_0
It doesn't have to be a federal intervention like somebody can do something
spk_0
To make these problems better and sitting around and waiting for them to
spk_0
You know make it an industry standard. I don't think it's going to be the
spk_0
The most fruitful way to proceed with this so I think we can do better
spk_0
But sometimes it's understanding that this is a problem. I don't think a lot of people
spk_0
Understand like what the a pillar would mean in terms of
spk_0
Seeing a pedestrian from your perspective like stuff like that
spk_0
Um, but once you understand it is a problem
spk_0
You know you look at some of the trucks now and I'm still the kind of person that will look over my shoulder when I'm changing
spk_0
Lanes and the way cars are designed now, which is really hard to like the blind spots are getting bigger and bigger and
spk_0
Everyone's relying on
spk_0
The technology to save the day like I remember the first time I was in a car that had that technology
spk_0
Probably 15 years ago one of my neighbors got a new BMW. We were driving up to the mountains
spk_0
To go snowboarding and he was changing lanes really nearly without looking else like oh my god, dude like what are you doing?
spk_0
He's like oh now the car will tell me like if there's a car there. I was like
spk_0
Hopefully but
spk_0
What I think it's like the sensors are dusty like I don't know like you get a lot of when you come back from the mountains every time your cars
spk_0
Pretty dusty like so I was having a hard time and like that's a good example of where you a lot of people assume this technology will make things safer
spk_0
Like it will if you
spk_0
Added on to what we're doing now. So if you look over your shoulders and add the technology to it
spk_0
It should lead to safety, but if we start replacing what we used to do right the safety question is not as simple
spk_0
So if you're relying on the technology entirely to change lanes
spk_0
Maybe it isn't safer. So the same like backup cameras and stuff like that like all that stuff we hope
spk_0
It's better. We just assume it's better, but it's not as easy. Right safety stuff is tricky. Yeah
spk_0
You're switching lanes you ideally have a technology that makes that safer, but like let's start maybe with making
spk_0
Shifting lanes a safe process, right and like whatever that is speed limits or you know
spk_0
Visual friction all that kind of stuff well even in a lot of parts of
spk_0
Denver you have these big arterials that have
spk_0
Probably more lanes than we need right? So if we have fewer lanes you don't need to switch lanes as much like
spk_0
It's the one thing I'm to do it on highways, but you know if we have more of a
spk_0
More of a network we have more than one option
spk_0
Because a lot of this part of Denver like you only have one option to get from a debate you have to go in that arterial
spk_0
And therefore we have to make those arterials really big with a lot of lanes is a lot of lane switching
spk_0
And that's where a lot of the safety problems come in if you have
spk_0
Another option you just move over one block and get from a to b
spk_0
It lets you build smaller streets where lane switching is on to the condition sure
spk_0
And Denver has that like Denver is is a place just like where I grew up like where if there's a crash if there's traffic on one street
spk_0
You just move over a block or two. Yeah, you can go in you never have to stop. Yeah, that's great
spk_0
You know we can we can wrap up soon the
spk_0
One thing I'm interested in and this comes up a lot is yeah
spk_0
Denver fire has a very specific
spk_0
You know they are maximalist when it comes to fire safety as they should be we want a fire department that is maximalist when it comes to fire safety
spk_0
They often run up against the street advocates safety advocates and
spk_0
Street designers and engineers. Yeah, we're trying to make a more safe street
spk_0
How
spk_0
Can those conversations be navigated and what advice would you give to somebody who
spk_0
Is in a situation where the fire department says actually we need the street to be wider because big traffic
spk_0
I mean big fire truck
spk_0
And this is a huge topic we could I mean this is actually topic I was gonna bring up the David to be my topic on one of the future podcasts
spk_0
Like yeah, too big but it's interesting because when we look at the data from Denver's fire department
spk_0
They respond to three times more car crashes than fires wow wow right so if you build streets that are safer that helps them out as well
spk_0
The other thing I'd say is that a lot of times you need to sort of treat what they think is good almost like a tactical urbanism project too
spk_0
Like I know when Denver is doing those does many roundabouts like the type of circles in the neighborhoods
spk_0
They got some complaints from some of the the fire
spk_0
Marshals or whatever but when tool I know tool design is the ones that did the first ones they literally brought out
spk_0
The fire truck and they drew the big circle on the ground and they tested it yeah and tool filmed them doing it
spk_0
And you know you put those
spk_0
And have the people the firefighters in a competitive situation like oh yeah, I can definitely do that yeah
spk_0
They did it and then later other people complaining. It's like no look you can do it you guys told us this was this was fine
spk_0
So I think you need to treat it like an experiment like let them see it and let them try it
spk_0
Um the last thing I'd say is we have plenty of neighborhoods in Denver that were built
spk_0
Like before traffic engineers existed that are technically too narrow from what they would want
spk_0
Whenever there's going to fire on those streets they got there. Yeah, yeah, right
spk_0
They don't have that problem on those streets
spk_0
But for some reason we can't build those same streets elsewhere. Yeah, so there's a disconnect there that I think we can do a better job of
spk_0
Of reconciling yeah great. Well last question. I'll wrap up here, which is you know
spk_0
Denver's made a number of I think advancements in the past few years and there's good conversation right now happening about street
spk_0
Seaf's yeah street safety
spk_0
And design
spk_0
What's something that you're seeing around the world that you're excited about
spk_0
If it could be brought to Denver
spk_0
That's a hard question because um
spk_0
You know a lot of people go to Europe and
spk_0
Say oh, we need to do this in Denver, but it does it's not that easy whenever I
spk_0
Never you talk to a US engineer say well, here's what co-p and taking doing here's what Amsterdam's doing
spk_0
Like their eyes glaze over like we can't possibly do that um
spk_0
And that's actually one of the reasons I took my sabbatical in Australia
spk_0
Because they're honestly doing a lot of similar things to those European countries, but for whatever reason American engineers
spk_0
Feel like they're more culturally similar to Australia
spk_0
You say oh, Sydney's doing this so like oh, yeah, we can do that. Yeah, they're just like us with silly voices
spk_0
Yeah, but it's just like like Denver makes for good example for other cities like if I tell you that boulders doing something are Portland
spk_0
Again, people's eyes glaze over, but if you say like Charlotte or Denver are doing things
spk_0
Then people listen like oh, they're Denver's doing it. We can do it. So I think we need to stand up as a better example of what we can do
spk_0
And you know, so there's no easy answers to that, but
spk_0
It's it's a it's not as simple as just taking like good prep best practices and just placing them here like it's a different different beast
spk_0
Awesome. Well, thanks so much. Yeah, really appreciate uh West Marshall go check out his podcast and thanks for coming on ours. I appreciate it. Thanks for having me. Yeah
Topics Covered
Denver Urbanism Podcast
West Marshall
Look Both Ways podcast
transportation issues
pedestrian safety
Vision Zero program
traffic engineering
urban planning
safety advocacy
transportation design
public participation
traffic fatalities
urban infrastructure
safety improvements
car technology
blind spots in vehicles