Science
Opening the Alaska Front—Civilian Facades and Strategic Moves
In this episode of China Watch, host Terry Wu delves into the increasing presence of Chinese research vessels near Alaska, exploring the implications of their activities within U.S. territorial waters...
Opening the Alaska Front—Civilian Facades and Strategic Moves
Science •
0:00 / 0:00
Interactive Transcript
spk_0
Welcome to China Watch, the place for China experts, with the epic times one of America's
spk_0
largest independent newspapers. I'm your host, Terry Wu, here in Washington, D.C.
spk_0
As a Chinese American, I've observed the actions of the Chinese regime for years, especially
spk_0
in how it interacts with the United States. I look at it from an economic angle, because
spk_0
that's what I studied and do for living. And I look at it from an ethical angle, because
spk_0
that's what I care about. The epic times have selected me to share these findings with
spk_0
you, fellow China watchers, because they know I'll do the best.
spk_0
For today's show, everything is about Alaska. Okay, maybe some of my dear China watchers
spk_0
are thinking, okay, Terry, I get it. You're stuck in D.C. You want to escape to the furthest
spk_0
lands in America that you can. While you're right, I do love Alaska. Don't get me wrong.
spk_0
The videos just can't capture the majesty of that northern land. I mean, I would even go as far
spk_0
as to say that I would like to retire there. When we were there in 2018, my husband had a very
spk_0
interesting description of it. This is where the higher beings rest before their death. I thought
spk_0
he had a point. It certainly explained, divide, powerful, tranquil, and with just a hint of
spk_0
sadness. In fact, I won't even call it sadness. It's the inner piece of meeting one's destiny.
spk_0
It's a solemn land. My husband's words resonated with me and my culture. In a Chinese creation
spk_0
story, the deity Panggu fell exhausted upon creating the world. When he died, his breasts turned into
spk_0
wind and clouds. His eyes became the sun and the moon. His limbs transformed into mountains.
spk_0
And to make light of that story, there's no mention of which part turned into oil and natural
spk_0
gas. You can imagine where I'm going with that, which we'll get to. So even though this sounded like
spk_0
an advertisement for Alaska tourism, I just had to share my love for Alaska. But alas, this isn't
spk_0
the wintery pleasure cruise that I would much rather be going on. It involves boats, yes,
spk_0
but in a much more serious fashion. When I saw in the news that Chinese research vessels came three
spk_0
times, once a month in the past three months near Alaska, I said, I must cover it. And just like
spk_0
Chinese fishing boats too much more than just fishing in the South China Sea, Chinese research
spk_0
vessels are likely doing more than just research off the coast of Alaska. Or to be explicit,
spk_0
we'll be going into their dual civilian and military use. So to begin our voyage and with the
spk_0
military in mind, let's first talk about grey zone tactics. The Rand Corporation, a global policy
spk_0
thing tank, defines grey zone tactics as quote, coercive actions that are shy of armed conflict,
spk_0
but beyond normal diplomatic, economic and other activities. So basically provoking opponents
spk_0
just below the threshold of war. And when we hear about grey zone tactics, we've seen the most
spk_0
news about that in the Indo-Pacific. For example, the South China Sea, but the Chinese regime is
spk_0
doing similar things near the United States. It just hasn't made many headlines. So why is China
spk_0
doing this? Is it an inescapable urge to poke a hornet's nest? And how has the United States
spk_0
responded? In this episode, we will cover the broader context of polar competition. We don't
spk_0
often hear about it, but it's of growing importance. And what the United States does now,
spk_0
similar in severity to things like rear-ers control and AI development, most likely, will either
spk_0
secure or lose advantages in the next decades. So make sure you stay until the end.
spk_0
Okay, let's first talk about what happened near Alaska before zooming out to the big picture.
spk_0
The United States Coast Guard issued six statements between the end of July and beginning of
spk_0
September. All about the same thing. All the statements were related to Chinese research
spk_0
vessels operating in the US Arctic, north of Alaska. In one of the statements, the Coast Guard said
spk_0
that there has been a three-year trend of increased activity from Chinese research vessels in
spk_0
the same area. The waters within 200 nautical miles of a country's coastline belong to the country.
spk_0
That rule comes from the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, UN clause.
spk_0
Although the United States has not ratified the UN clause largely due to disputes over deep sea
spk_0
mining, it observes the majority of the convention. The area in which the Chinese vessel operated
spk_0
was what's called an extended continental shelf. That means the landmass beyond 200 nautical miles
spk_0
of the coastline. Picture a globe of the earth. It's right in the Arctic circle, somewhere between
spk_0
the North Pole and Alaska. A country has exclusive rights regularly scientific research in its extended
spk_0
continental shelf. Other countries need to obtain consent before conducting any research there.
spk_0
And this is where the first violation of the UN rules comes up. That grey zone provocation I was
spk_0
talking about. China didn't coordinate its operations in the US extended continental shelf north of
spk_0
Alaska with the United States. After one research vessel was chased off in July, it returned in August
spk_0
with four more vessels. Kind of a, come and get me moved by China, isn't it? In August, the US
spk_0
Coast Guard moved two ships, an icebreaker and a cutter to Alaska to increase its presence.
spk_0
Then between August 31 and September 2, two out of the five Chinese research vessels reappeared
spk_0
near Alaska. The ships stood it right before returning to China. A senior officer for an American
spk_0
icebreaker told Breaking Defense a digital news platform, the China ships unannounced seemingly
spk_0
unapproved presence in American waters, is concerning and outside international norms.
spk_0
A former official of the Department of Homeland Security told the news outlet that the fact that
spk_0
Coast Guard responded to China's actions meant that the United States treated China's aggression
spk_0
as a grey zone activity, not a military threat, requiring escalation or a defense-oriented response.
spk_0
In August 2023, though, 11 Russian and Chinese military ships steamed near Alaska in a joint
spk_0
patrol. That triggered a US Navy response with four destroyers and a P8 Poseidon aircraft
spk_0
shattering them. The foreign ships stayed in international waters. But this time in July 2025,
spk_0
the Chinese came back with research vessels. The Chinese regime has been rejecting any claims about
spk_0
its research vessels doing anything beyond normal scientific activities.
spk_0
Oh my goodness, guys, stop overreacting! We're totally doing pure scientific research out here.
spk_0
Does nothing militaristic about this? Or in the regime's own words, quote,
spk_0
stop the groundless suspicion and speculations, unquote. Seriously, how would it look to respond to
spk_0
a quote unquote research vessel with destroyers? That's why grey zone activities are tricky.
spk_0
It pushes the boundary and can change the status quo if not addressed.
spk_0
We have just talked about what happened and the US response. Before we cover the bigger picture,
spk_0
let's talk about what the Chinese side said about the research mission.
spk_0
This time, the Chinese regime didn't say anything officially about its research vessels in
spk_0
fringing US rights near Alaska. Instead, global times a mouthpiece of the Chinese Communist Party,
spk_0
which often sends out quasi-official messages, accused the United States of wrongdoing.
spk_0
The published article said the US is playing a quote, villain strikes first game.
spk_0
Doing quote, evil deeds in the Arctic and being a rulemaker and a troublemaker.
spk_0
After the US coast card caught out the Chinese vessels in appropriate behavior in July.
spk_0
As usual, the Chinese regime's allegations lacked specifics. And frankly, I'm not so sure
spk_0
how rulemaker and troublemaker labels can coexist on one entity.
spk_0
Chinese media reported a successful and the largest 15th Pola Scientific Research Mission in early
spk_0
September. Chinese media also reported that during the mission China completed the first ever
spk_0
meant deep sea diving under the Arctic ice in August. According to Chinese media reports,
spk_0
this breakthrough will facilitate large-scale underwater sampling, particularly when combined
spk_0
with the use of robots. Okay, that's the regime's reporting on it. Let's move on to the dual use
spk_0
side of the issue. Dual use is a shortened term for the original Chinese phrase,
spk_0
militaries and civilian dual use, also known as military civil fusion. The idea is that
spk_0
civilian sectors such as technology, shipping, energy, research, universities, and private firms
spk_0
should be mobilized to serve military goals. Again, the example of fishing vessels taking
spk_0
parting geopolitical activities in the South China Sea. And how can the research in the Arctic
spk_0
serve military use? Forbes reported that Chinese research vessels are collecting marine data on an
spk_0
unprecedented scale from Australia to Alaska. The magazine said a Chinese regime-backed fleet
spk_0
of 64 civilian vessels has locked hundreds of thousands of hours of operations globally
spk_0
in the past four years, and 80 percent of these vessels have some ties to China's military
spk_0
or geopolitical agenda. How could the research be applied to military purposes?
spk_0
Sea bat mapping can be used for potential submarine navigation and tie submarine warfare planning
spk_0
and locating routes for undersea cables or choke points. At the end of August,
spk_0
Russia and China conducted their first-ever joint submarine patrol in the Pacific. It happened
spk_0
in the Sea of Japan and the East China Sea. The Arctic was as much of a battle ground as it could be,
spk_0
so to speak, for the United States and the former USSR during the Cold War. Afterwards,
spk_0
Russia maintained a great amount of influence in the region. Since the invasion of Ukraine and the
spk_0
West's sanctions, Russia has been increasingly relying on China for energy projects and other
spk_0
infrastructure development. That's just China's wants because it has had its eyes on the Arctic for
spk_0
decades. Although it doesn't have any territory in the Arctic, China refers to itself as a near-Arctic
spk_0
country. It released its first-ever Arctic policy in 2018 during the first Trump administration.
spk_0
Back then, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo rejected that name. He said a country is either Arctic
spk_0
or non-Arctic. All right, now we're going to zoom out. Why does China want the Arctic so badly?
spk_0
That's next. You're listening to China Watch, where you go to source for US
spk_0
China analysis. So follow the show. You and I both know this is a five-star show.
spk_0
Believe or rating so everyone else can discover us. Tell your friends that we're on Apple,
spk_0
search for China Watch Epic Times. This podcast is a weekly production with new episodes every
spk_0
Monday evening. Support independent journalism by subscribing to the Epic Times.
spk_0
The Arctic is strategically important not just for China, but also for many others as well.
spk_0
Because of the region's value in global shipping and its energy resources,
spk_0
the US Geological Survey estimates that 22% of the world's undiscovered energy resources
spk_0
are located in the Arctic. That includes 13% of undiscovered oil and 30% of undiscovered natural
spk_0
gas. Most of such resources are under the Arctic Ocean. This is of particular interest to China,
spk_0
since it relies on importing energy to meet domestic demand. It imports over 40% of its natural
spk_0
gas and over 70% of its oil. The Center for Strategic and International Studies says that
spk_0
reliance on foreign energy is only going to increase for China. Energy security has been a major
spk_0
national security issue that the Chinese regime is concerned about. And that involves materials
spk_0
and logistics. That is anything that would disrupt the import of those energy resources to China
spk_0
would be crippling to the regime's economy. One of those choke points is the straight of Malaka,
spk_0
situated in a South China Sea between Malaysia and Indonesia. The Malaka delima was first reported
spk_0
in the Chinese media in 2004, citing a speech that then regime leader Hu Jingtao made in 2003.
spk_0
In a speech who mentioned that Malaka's straight being a potential choke point, remember what I
spk_0
said about choke points? About 80% of China's oil imports sail through the straight of Malaka.
spk_0
A blockage there can potentially cause an energy crisis in China if no alternative routes are
spk_0
available. Another important international waterway is the Suez Canal, which is currently
spk_0
plagued by violence. That's where the Arctic comes in. The shipping route in the Arctic region can
spk_0
serve as an alternative to the shipping routes through both the straight of Malaka and the Suez
spk_0
Canal. Due to melting ice, the Arctic shipping seasons longer and more shipping routes are becoming
spk_0
available. Currently, the two major routes are the Norden Sea Route along the Russian coast and the
spk_0
northwest passage along the coasts of Canadian and Alaskan waters. Potentially two more may become
spk_0
available when it's the transpolar sea route crossing the central Arctic, which is essentially a
spk_0
shorter version of the Norden Sea Route. Another is the Arctic Bridge Route, which begins at the most
spk_0
northern points of the Nordic regions including Russia and traverses the southern tip of Greenland
spk_0
into Canada's Hudson Bay. I put the link of the map of polar shipping routes in the show notes.
spk_0
China relies on foreign energy to keep lights on domestically and also global shipping for
spk_0
energy supply and its export-driven economic model. So with energy in mind, China would naturally
spk_0
want another route, which it would control with an ally to have faster shipments of energy coming in.
spk_0
As for imports and exports, the Arctic routes enhance the shipping efficiency by 20-40%.
spk_0
That's simply because of a shorter travel distance point to point, which translates to fewer days
spk_0
per trip and less fuel required. For example, according to the Arctic Institute, a think tank based
spk_0
in Washington, DC, the Norden Sea Route could be 25% more profitable than the Suez Canal route by the
spk_0
year 2100. Therefore, the Arctic region can play a critical role in global trade and resource
spk_0
extraction. That's why China is so obsessed with the region. In 2013, the first Chinese commercial
spk_0
ship traveled from China to the Netherlands veered a route along the Russian coast. It was a one-way
spk_0
journey made by a vessel owned by the state-owned China Cosco shipping. Two years later,
spk_0
the same ship made a round trip between China and Europe along the same route. In 2017, five
spk_0
vessels made that same trip. Then this year, on September 22nd, China announced that the launch of
spk_0
the world's first China-Europe Arctic container express route would begin the following day.
spk_0
According to the announcement, the shipping path takes the Norden Sea Route. It would take 18 days,
spk_0
20 days fewer than the traditional 40-day route. The news also boasted the new container express
spk_0
route as a result of a state-backed program called the Polar Silk Road to support the supply
spk_0
chain of China's high-tech, new energy and e-commerce sectors. Oh my, that sounds like much
spk_0
faster dumping of China's overcapacity to the rest of the world. Speaking of Polar Silk Road,
spk_0
it's the perfect segue to the China-Russia partnership. The so-called near-octored country needs a
spk_0
real Arctic country to expand access and influence in the Arctic. Ah, yes, this is China's no-limits
spk_0
strategic relationship with Russia and how it comes in handy. In 2017, when the Chinese
spk_0
Communist leader Xi Jinping visited Moscow, he proposed the idea of Polar Silk Road as an extension
spk_0
of China's Belt and Road Initiative, also called BRI. After all, the Belt and Road is Xi's signature
spk_0
program. He proposed it shortly after he took over the Chinese Communist Party in late 2012.
spk_0
It was built as a global infrastructure development program. Since its inception in 2013,
spk_0
the program has revealed itself as a geopolitical, if not imperialistic, program,
spk_0
availing the recipient country's natural resources to the Chinese regime and their ports for
spk_0
the oil use. So the value of the Polar Silk Road to the Chinese regime is an obriner.
spk_0
Since the Ukraine War and Western Sentience, Russia has opened up the Arctic to China like
spk_0
never before. That's according to a 2024 article by the Arctic Institute. A total of 75 shipments
spk_0
passed through Russian coastlines in 2023 and over 95% of them either left from China or went to
spk_0
China as a final destination. The think tank also reported that between January 2022 and June 2023,
spk_0
234 Chinese-owned firms registered in the Russian-controlled Arctic, an 87% increase from the
spk_0
preceding two years. And if you need any more convincing of what China intends, after February
spk_0
2022, the month Russia invaded Ukraine, China has started constructing its own dogs in the five
spk_0
most significant ports along Russia's Arctic coastline, along with establishing Chinese railway
spk_0
lines in the area. Rather than pool-turing the Russian port names, I'll put them in the show notes.
spk_0
We have touched upon the Chinese regime's dual-use strategy a few times. To some extent,
spk_0
the commotion over the Chinese research vessels near Alaska is because of this dual-use strategy
spk_0
and the untrustworthiness of the Chinese regime's claims and actions. For some, it's easy to forget
spk_0
that only the barring straight separates the United States and Russia geologically. And in terms
spk_0
of military advantages, the Arctic region is a nice place to hide nuclear submarines. That's due to
spk_0
the ice-natural screening to block electromagnetic waves and satellite surveillance.
spk_0
President Donald Trump had talked about purchasing Greenland in his first term. He mentioned it again
spk_0
this year. Secretary of State Marco Rubio's explanation was that the United States was increasingly
spk_0
concerned about the Chinese influence there, and concerned that Denmark wouldn't be strong enough
spk_0
to keep China away. Greenland is an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark.
spk_0
In addition, Trump has been talking about making Canada the 51st state in America.
spk_0
If we look at the map of the Arctic Circle, that makes sense because by doing so, the United States
spk_0
can have total control over the coastlines facing Russia. That is all to say, the age of Arctic
spk_0
exceptionalism is over. That term Arctic exceptionalism was coined by the final leader of the Soviet
spk_0
Union, Mikhail Gorbachev. That basically meant that the Arctic was left as a peaceful zone,
spk_0
or using the name more literally, an exception to the world's geopolitical problems.
spk_0
The concept has persisted since the Cold War, but with an increase in trade and energy
spk_0
demands, it seems like those states are numbered. The Arctic Ocean certainly has the potential to
spk_0
become a focal point of geopolitical tensions, where the United States faces off with the duel
spk_0
of China and Russia. And we all know if a moment like that happens, the dragon will be greening
spk_0
as it's shielded behind the bear. That's it for today. Spread the word about our show,
spk_0
to your friends and family. We need your help to get our name out there. Till next time, I'm Terry Wu.
spk_0
Thanks for listening.